Tests – · none yet Owners 65 · 10 reviews
Continental ContiProContact SSR vs Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 1,457 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ContiProContact SSR 66, Firehawk Indy 500 65.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 62 · 1,457 reviews
Best test result: #6 of 22 in 2022 Consumer Reports Ultra High Performance Summer Tires (tested tread life (miles))
“I just put Firestone Firehawk Indy 500's on my NC2 and I like them and would recommend them. I paid about $635 with installation at Costco but you might even be able to find them for less elsewhere.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
65
Dry
Firehawk Indy 500 +974Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 64 77 ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.9 = 65
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 71.8 (est.) + 40% × 77.2 = 74
No road tests of dry for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
ContiProContact SSR +466Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 69 65 ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 67.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66
No road tests of wet for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
65
Snow
ContiProContact SSR +2045Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 61 27 ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.3 = 65
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 56.7 (est.) + 40% × 27.3 = 45
No road tests of snow for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
60
Comfort
Firehawk Indy 500 +565Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 56 64 ContiProContact SSR: 40% × 66.2 (est.) + 60% × 56.3 = 60
Firehawk Indy 500: 40% × 67.6 (est.) + 60% × 63.5 = 65
No road tests of comfort for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Noise
ContiProContact SSR +265Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 68 64 ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.2 = 67
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65
No road tests of noise for ContiProContact SSR or Firehawk Indy 500. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
66
Treadwear
Level66Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR Firehawk Indy 500 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 65 61 ContiProContact SSR: 60% × 66.1 (est.) + 40% × 65.4 = 66
Firehawk Indy 500: 60% × 70.2 + 40% × 60.7 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for ContiProContact SSR. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
–
Handling (owners)
No comparison71Why this score
Source ContiProContact SSR Firehawk Indy 500 Reviews found online – 71
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiProContact SSR | Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 65 |
| Dry | 65 | 74 |
| Wet | 70 | 66 |
| Snow | 65 | 45 |
| Comfort | 60 | 65 |
| Noise | 67 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 66 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | – | 71 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ContiProContact SSR
Firehawk Indy 500
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiProContact SSR
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Firehawk Indy 500
Pros
- Exceptional value and affordability compared to premium tier brands like Michelin
- Outstanding dry grip and confident, responsive cornering capabilities
- Surprisingly quiet and comfortable ride quality on the highway
Cons
- Accelerated tread wear and shorter overall lifespan
- Poor performance and loss of traction in cold temperatures (below 40°F)
- Vulnerability to hydroplaning or reduced traction in heavy standing water
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ContiProContact SSR
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
The Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is overwhelmingly praised as an exceptional value and 'bang for your buck' summer performance tire. Drivers consistently highlight strong dry grip, commendable wet traction, comfortable ride quality, and progressive handling breakaway. Minor criticisms center on reduced performance in cold temperatures, softer steering feedback, and grease on hard track sessions.
“At autocross, as a passenger in my main rivals car(in the slow fwd crap cars on UHP's division), my heart sank as these firehawks would take all sorts of hamfisted overdriving and still grip very well with all sorts of fwd full throttle understeer.... Granted his were new and my sport comp2's had one season on them, but it was shocking how they gripped better with lots of slip angle or wheelspin, compared to my tires... I did manage to beat him still, but I think I was much more on a knife edge than him for the whole run....”
“Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 Tire Review After my stock rubber wore down I decided to look into other (cheaper) options for this summer. I landed on getting a set of Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 205/40/17 tires and have been on them for about a week now in both rain and dry. The TLDR of this would be buy these tires! The longer version of it is that these tires to me at least feel much more comfortable than the stock tires both in terms of ride comfort and road noise. On top of that the grip in the wet is impressive to say the least! I got a lot of rain here in Oregon so wet performance was really important to me. On the stock tires I always left my TC on and was careful going around turns especially as the tires wore down further and further. These Indy 500 just keep on gripping in the wet and I haven't had any problems at all. The first day I had them out in the dry I would have sworn my car was actually faster accelerating! Probably because there was less wheel hopping or it simply just grabbed the road better. I haven't tried a launch on them yet but hope to do some auto-crossing and such in the Spring. If you have any questions about these things fire away. Read more”
“I should walk back on my comment about there being numerous other tires I would choose. I forget about many tires getting damaged by cold weather. Like others I've had good luck with Firehawk Indy 500's. They are usually very competitvely priced. I actually got caught in a snowstorm with my CTS-V and made it home safely without a scare, with that being said you probably would be better off with something in the UHPAS class. I've had insanely good luck with Continental DWS06. They barely give up much performance to the Sport Contacts that I'm currently running, but the Continentals are only sold in 205/45R17, so you have to ask yourself if you are okay with a slightly taller sidewall. The continentals have a rebate going on too, but I think it ends today. Not sure if it is going to be renewed for next month.”
Based on 141 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiProContact SSR | B · Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season tire | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 47 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ | 16″ – 20″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | 9 - 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 400 A A | 340 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | 40,000 mi | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiProContact SSR
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500
Too close to call: Continental ContiProContact SSR and Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiProContact SSR is stronger on snow and wet. Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 is stronger on dry and comfort. Continental ContiProContact SSR rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 65 vs 45 on snow.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 74 vs 65 on dry.
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500 scores 65 vs 60 on comfort.
Continental ContiProContact SSR scores 70 vs 66 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiProContact SSR or Firehawk Indy 500?
Which is better in the wet, ContiProContact SSR or Firehawk Indy 500?
Continental ContiProContact SSR, 70 vs 66 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiProContact SSR or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 74 vs 65 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ContiProContact SSR or Firehawk Indy 500?
Continental ContiProContact SSR, 65 vs 45 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, ContiProContact SSR or Firehawk Indy 500?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the noise score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiProContact SSR or Firehawk Indy 500?
Firestone Firehawk Indy 500, 65 vs 60 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiProContact SSR or Firehawk Indy 500?
Neither, by our numbers: 66 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology