Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 11 reviews
Continental ContiRoad Attack looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiRoad Attack vs Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 11 + 184 owner reviews. How we score
Diablo Rosso IV is ahead, 80–70
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 85 · 184 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 12 in 2025 Sport and Hypersport Motorcycle Tyre Test (wet handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Diablo Rosso IV +877Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Diablo Rosso IV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 70 91 ContiRoad Attack: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69
Diablo Rosso IV: 60% × 67.8 + 40% × 91.4 = 77
No road tests of dry for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
Diablo Rosso IV +1484Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Diablo Rosso IV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 70 87 ContiRoad Attack: 60% × 70.1 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 70
Diablo Rosso IV: 60% × 81.4 + 40% × 87 = 84
No road tests of wet for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
Diablo Rosso IV +1180Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Diablo Rosso IV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 70 85 ContiRoad Attack: 40% × 69 (est.) + 60% × 69.8 = 69
Diablo Rosso IV: 40% × 72 (est.) + 60% × 84.7 = 80
No road tests of comfort for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Diablo Rosso IV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
70
Treadwear
Diablo Rosso IV +171Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Diablo Rosso IV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 72 75 ContiRoad Attack: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 70
Diablo Rosso IV: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for ContiRoad Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Diablo Rosso IV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
71
Handling (owners)
Diablo Rosso IV +2091Why this score
Source ContiRoad Attack Diablo Rosso IV Reviews found online 71 91
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiRoad Attack | Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 70 | 80 |
| Dry | 69 | 77 |
| Wet | 70 | 84 |
| Comfort | 69 | 80 |
| Treadwear | 70 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 71 | 91 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiRoad Attack
Diablo Rosso IV
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiRoad Attack
Pros
- Minimal warm-up time due to advanced construction technology
- Excellent dry-weather grip and cornering agility
- Strong longevity and consistent performance over high mileage
Cons
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance reported by some users
- Potential for front-end cupping or vibration as the tire wears
- Handling can feel overly aggressive or 'twitchy' for riders accustomed to more neutral profiles
Tire B Diablo Rosso IV
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip with a high level of rider confidence
- Fast warm-up time and predictable handling at deep lean angles
- Improved steering precision and turn-in compared to previous generations like the Diablo Rosso III
Cons
- Higher price point compared to some competitors and previous models
- Noticeable reduction in grip and increased rear wheel spin as the tires wear down
- Requires full operating temperature for optimal performance late in its life cycle
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiRoad Attack | B · Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiRoad Attack
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV
Winner: Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiRoad Attack rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV scores 91 vs 71 on handling.
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV scores 84 vs 70 on wet.
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV scores 80 vs 69 on comfort.
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV scores 77 vs 69 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiRoad Attack or Diablo Rosso IV?
Which is better in the wet, ContiRoad Attack or Diablo Rosso IV?
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV, 84 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiRoad Attack or Diablo Rosso IV?
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV, 77 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiRoad Attack or Diablo Rosso IV?
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV, 80 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiRoad Attack or Diablo Rosso IV?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology