Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 vs Michelin Road 6 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 695 owner reviews. How we score

Road 6 is ahead, 81–71

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
± 7Provisional

Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 70 · 1 review

Best test result: #1 of 6 in 2020 Motorcycle Sports Touring Tyre Test (dry braking)

Michelin Road 6
± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 85 · 695 reviews

“I did over 10k km on the stock tires, the moment i switched to Michelin road 6 the bike behaved so much better. Especially in the corners. Only downside is that the tire itself doesn't look good imo.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    Road 6 +8
    81
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Road 6
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73≈ 76 (est.)
    Reviews found online7288

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 73

    Road 6: 60% × 76.4 (est.) + 40% × 88.4 = 81

    No road tests of dry for Road 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 74

    Wet

    Road 6 +11
    85
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Road 6
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 81 (est.)
    Reviews found online7590

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 74

    Road 6: 60% × 81.3 (est.) + 40% × 89.9 = 85

    No road tests of wet for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Road 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Comfort

    Road 6 +9
    76
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Road 6
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6680

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67

    Road 6: 40% × 71 (est.) + 60% × 79.7 = 76

    No road tests of comfort for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

    No road tests of comfort for Road 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  4. 65

    Treadwear

    Road 6 +8
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Road 6
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online6478

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65

    Road 6: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.8 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Road 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Road 6 +17
    88
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Road 6
    Reviews found online7188
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 vs Michelin Road 6: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiRoadAttack 3Michelin Road 6
Relative Score 71 81
Dry 73 81
Wet 74 85
Comfort 67 76
Treadwear 65 73
Handling (owners) 71 88

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

ContiRoadAttack 3

± 8

Road 6

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiRoadAttack 3

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance on paved surfaces
  • High level of rider confidence
  • Well-suited for sport-touring applications

Cons

  • Not suitable for off-road or gravel terrain
  • Susceptible to rapid tread damage when used on unpaved surfaces
All owner themes in the ContiRoadAttack 3 review

Tire B Road 6

Pros

  • Excellent grip in both dry and wet conditions, including under hard acceleration with high torque
  • Strong wet-weather performance, described as 'fantastic'
  • Smooth ride with confident, consistent handling

Cons

  • Noise, reported by one reviewer
  • One reviewer needed the front tyre rebalanced after fitting
  • Handling judged no better than the Metzeler Z8 Interact by one reviewer
All owner themes in the Road 6 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Road 6

Positive

Riders widely praise the Michelin Road 6 for its exceptional wet-weather grip, versatility, and confidence-inspiring handling across daily commuting and sport touring. While most users report outstanding mileage, some aggressive riders note premature wear or cupping, alongside a premium price tag. Occasional criticisms also highlight limited edge grip compared to dedicated hypersport tires and rare reports of punctures or blowouts.

r/Ninja400 ·148 upvotes ·2025-07-12

“Switched to Michelin Road 6 tires and wento up a tire size front and rear Got about 11k miles out of the stock Dunlops before the front started cupping and the rear was at the minimum tread depth. Since I bought the bike I wanted to go up in tire size to 120/70/17 Front and 160/60/17 rear. I took it easy the first 60 miles and today was the first day I got to really feel the difference and it’s night and day. The combination of the Road 6s just being a more grippy tire and the bigger tire sizes is a great combo for this bike. It’s still flicky but it takes slightly more effort to lean into corners which allows me to more finely adjust to the line I want to take. The best analogy I can use to describe it is in first person video games when the sensitivity is too high for your play style and you turn it down and it lets you be more accurate. The tires also raise the bike slightly which for me puts it at a perfect height. Before the bike just set a little lower for my liking but now I feel like I sit perfectly above the road and in turns I feel like I have better stability. This is my first motorcycle of any kind so by the time I felt comfortable enough to lean in aggressively the rear tire was squared off enough to feel not ideal. Sorry for the rant just really excited about my choice. Read more”

r/bmwmotorrad ·1 upvote ·2026-06-06

“I had Road 6 on mine, but the front had developed a step and apparently when they get low then do become very puncture prone. Not as good when carrying a load either as the side walls aren't as strong. Always happy with them but they came with the bike. Swapped to Bridgestone A41 as I needed a fresh set for doing the NC500 fully loaded with a pillion. To me, they feel fantastic and in the wet the confidence is extremely high with them.”

r/MT09 ·2 upvotes ·2025-10-07

“Having used both. Road 6 heats up better and is ready to use faster. Power 6 heats up slowly and needs to be ridden hard with to keep it hot. They both stick well. Road 6 can feel squirmy but IMO that's due to the carcass flex from all the grooving. I've had a road 6 working itself sideways at lean until I apply a little throttle and it feels like it then locks into the road. The power 6 is harder to use to it's full potential on the street. If the power 6 had a slightly harder center compound then it would be a lot better. Edit months later and i've switched to T33's and I can say that I will never run road 6 again.”

Top themes
#wet weather grip#mileage and longevity#cornering confidence#sport touring versatility#high purchase price#tread cupping issues#sport tire comparison

Based on 252 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 B · Michelin Road 6
CategorySummer—
Vehicle typeMotorcycleMotorcycle

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3

Michelin Road 6

Winner: Michelin Road 6 — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Road 6 scores 88 vs 71 on handling.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Road 6 scores 85 vs 74 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Road 6 scores 76 vs 67 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Road 6 scores 81 vs 73 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
Tire B · Michelin Road 6

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiRoadAttack 3 or Road 6?

Which is better in the wet, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Road 6?

Michelin Road 6, 85 vs 74 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Road 6?

Michelin Road 6, 81 vs 73 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Road 6?

Michelin Road 6, 76 vs 67 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Road 6?

Michelin Road 6, 73 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology