Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 vs Pirelli Scorpion Trail II — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 1 + 9 owner reviews. How we score

ContiRoadAttack 3 leads, 71–68 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
± 7Provisional

Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 70 · 1 review

Best test result: #1 of 6 in 2020 Motorcycle Sports Touring Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 73

    Dry

    ContiRoadAttack 3 +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Scorpion Trail II
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests73≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7270

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 73

    Scorpion Trail II: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Scorpion Trail II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 74

    Wet

    ContiRoadAttack 3 +6
    68
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Scorpion Trail II
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 73 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online7566

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 73.2 (est.) + 40% × 75.2 = 74

    Scorpion Trail II: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 68

    No road tests of wet for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Scorpion Trail II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 67

    Comfort

    Scorpion Trail II +1
    68
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Scorpion Trail II
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6668

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 40% × 68.1 (est.) + 60% × 65.9 = 67

    Scorpion Trail II: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 67.8 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Scorpion Trail II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 65

    Treadwear

    ContiRoadAttack 3 +2
    63
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Scorpion Trail II
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online6461

    ContiRoadAttack 3: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 64.2 = 65

    Scorpion Trail II: 60% × 64.5 (est.) + 40% × 61 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiRoadAttack 3. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion Trail II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 71

    Handling (owners)

    Level
    71
    Why this score
    SourceContiRoadAttack 3Scorpion Trail II
    Reviews found online7171
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 vs Pirelli Scorpion Trail II: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiRoadAttack 3Pirelli Scorpion Trail II
Relative Score 71 68
Dry 73 69
Wet 74 68
Comfort 67 68
Treadwear 65 63
Handling (owners) 71 71

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

ContiRoadAttack 3

± 8

Scorpion Trail II

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiRoadAttack 3

Pros

  • Excellent grip and performance on paved surfaces
  • High level of rider confidence
  • Well-suited for sport-touring applications

Cons

  • Not suitable for off-road or gravel terrain
  • Susceptible to rapid tread damage when used on unpaved surfaces
All owner themes in the ContiRoadAttack 3 review

Tire B Scorpion Trail II

Pros

  • Excellent grip and confidence on dry pavement
  • Strong performance on light off-road trails and varied surfaces like gravel and dirt
  • Quick warm-up time in favorable conditions

Cons

  • Poor wet-weather performance and susceptibility to hydroplaning
  • Twitchy or unstable handling characteristics in rain
  • Rapid tread wear and premature flattening
All owner themes in the Scorpion Trail II review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 B · Pirelli Scorpion Trail II
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeMotorcycleMotorcycle

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3

Pirelli Scorpion Trail II

Narrow edge: Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 — better wet and dry. Where the Pirelli Scorpion Trail II is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 1 review), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli Scorpion Trail II rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 74 vs 68 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 73 vs 69 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
Tire B · Pirelli Scorpion Trail II

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiRoadAttack 3 or Scorpion Trail II?

Which is better in the wet, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Scorpion Trail II?

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3, 74 vs 68 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Scorpion Trail II?

Continental ContiRoadAttack 3, 73 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Scorpion Trail II?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 68 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, ContiRoadAttack 3 or Scorpion Trail II?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 63 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology