Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 7 reviews
Continental ContiSport Attack vs Avon Storm 2 Ultra — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ContiSport Attack leads, 72–69 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 26 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ContiSport Attack +570Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Storm 2 Ultra Reviews found online 79 71 -
71
Wet
ContiSport Attack +368Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Storm 2 Ultra Reviews found online 71 68 -
71
Comfort
ContiSport Attack +170Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Storm 2 Ultra Reviews found online 74 71 -
65
Treadwear
Storm 2 Ultra +570Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Storm 2 Ultra Reviews found online 65 73 -
78
Handling
ContiSport Attack +969Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Storm 2 Ultra Reviews found online 78 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSport Attack | Avon Storm 2 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 69 |
| Dry | 75 | 70 |
| Wet | 71 | 68 |
| Comfort | 71 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 70 |
| Handling | 78 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiSport Attack
Storm 2 Ultra
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSport Attack
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Tire B Storm 2 Ultra
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and high mileage capability
- Strong dry-weather grip and stability
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Slow warm-up time in cold or damp conditions
- Inconsistent wet-weather traction for some riders
- Potential for steering wobble or vague front-end feel on specific models
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSport Attack | B · Avon Storm 2 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSport Attack
Avon Storm 2 Ultra
Winner: Continental ContiSport Attack — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Avon Storm 2 Ultra if treadwear matters most to you.
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 78 vs 69 on handling.
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 75 vs 70 on dry.
Avon Storm 2 Ultra scores 70 vs 65 on treadwear.
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 71 vs 68 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.