Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 7 reviews
Continental ContiSport Attack looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Avon Storm 2 Ultra looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiSport Attack vs Avon Storm 2 Ultra — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 26 owner reviews. How we score
ContiSport Attack leads, 73–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 26 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ContiSport Attack +372Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Storm 2 Ultra Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 79 74 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 75
Storm 2 Ultra: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.6 = 72
No road tests of dry for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Storm 2 Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
ContiSport Attack +370Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Storm 2 Ultra Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 74 69 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 73
Storm 2 Ultra: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 70
No road tests of wet for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Storm 2 Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
72
Comfort
ContiSport Attack +171Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Storm 2 Ultra Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 74 72 ContiSport Attack: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.8 = 72
Storm 2 Ultra: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 72.1 = 71
No road tests of comfort for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Storm 2 Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
Storm 2 Ultra +774Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Storm 2 Ultra Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 67 78 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
Storm 2 Ultra: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.9 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Storm 2 Ultra. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
ContiSport Attack +970Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Storm 2 Ultra Reviews found online 79 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSport Attack | Avon Storm 2 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 71 |
| Dry | 75 | 72 |
| Wet | 73 | 70 |
| Comfort | 72 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiSport Attack
Storm 2 Ultra
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSport Attack
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Tire B Storm 2 Ultra
Pros
- Exceptional tread life and high mileage capability
- Strong dry-weather grip and stability
- Excellent value for money compared to premium competitors
Cons
- Slow warm-up time in cold or damp conditions
- Inconsistent wet-weather traction for some riders
- Potential for steering wobble or vague front-end feel on specific models
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSport Attack | B · Avon Storm 2 Ultra |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSport Attack
Avon Storm 2 Ultra
Narrow edge: Continental ContiSport Attack — better handling, dry and wet. Pick the Avon Storm 2 Ultra if treadwear matters most to you. Continental ContiSport Attack rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 79 vs 70 on handling.
Avon Storm 2 Ultra scores 74 vs 67 on treadwear.
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 75 vs 72 on dry.
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 73 vs 70 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSport Attack or Storm 2 Ultra?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSport Attack or Storm 2 Ultra?
Continental ContiSport Attack, 73 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSport Attack or Storm 2 Ultra?
Continental ContiSport Attack, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSport Attack or Storm 2 Ultra?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ContiSport Attack or Storm 2 Ultra?
Avon Storm 2 Ultra, 74 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology