Tests 47 · 1 test Owners 71 · 9 reviews
Continental ContiSport Attack looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 vs Continental ContiSport Attack — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 9 + 7 owner reviews. How we score
ContiSport Attack is ahead, 73–66
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 7 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
ContiSport Attack +575Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 ContiSport Attack Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 72 79 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 69.5 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 75
No road tests of dry for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
60
Wet
ContiSport Attack +1373Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 ContiSport Attack Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 47 ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 78 74 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 47.5 + 40% × 78.3 = 60
ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 73
No road tests of wet for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
73
Comfort
Battlax Sport Touring T32 +172Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 ContiSport Attack Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 75 74 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 75 = 73
ContiSport Attack: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.8 = 72
No road tests of comfort for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
64
Treadwear
ContiSport Attack +367Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 ContiSport Attack Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 62 67 Battlax Sport Touring T32: 60% × 65 (est.) + 40% × 62.3 = 64
ContiSport Attack: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Battlax Sport Touring T32. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
75
Handling (owners)
ContiSport Attack +479Why this score
Source Battlax Sport Touring T32 ContiSport Attack Reviews found online 75 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 | Continental ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 73 |
| Dry | 70 | 75 |
| Wet | 60 | 73 |
| Comfort | 73 | 72 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 75 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
66
/ 100
Battlax Sport Touring T32
73
/ 100
ContiSport Attack
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Battlax Sport Touring T32
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather performance and heavy rain confidence
- High-speed stability, including at autobahn speeds with full luggage
- Immediate improvement in handling agility and steering feel compared to competitors or older tires
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear and relatively low mileage lifespan
- Rear tire can slip or slide when pushed hard in dry, warm conditions
- Reduced performance feel after a few thousand miles of use
Tire B ContiSport Attack
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 | B · Continental ContiSport Attack |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
66
/ 100
Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32
73
/ 100
Continental ContiSport Attack
Winner: Continental ContiSport Attack — better wet, dry and treadwear. Where the Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32 rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental ContiSport Attack rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 73 vs 60 on wet.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 75 vs 70 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 67 vs 64 on treadwear.
Tire A · Bridgestone Battlax Sport Touring T32
Tire B · Continental ContiSport Attack
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Battlax Sport Touring T32 or ContiSport Attack?
Which is better in the wet, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or ContiSport Attack?
Continental ContiSport Attack, 73 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or ContiSport Attack?
Continental ContiSport Attack, 75 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or ContiSport Attack?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 72 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Battlax Sport Touring T32 or ContiSport Attack?
Continental ContiSport Attack, 67 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology