Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 7 reviews
Continental ContiSport Attack looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiSport Attack vs Pirelli Diablo Rosso III — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: ContiSport Attack and Diablo Rosso III are level at 73.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 9 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ContiSport Attack +174Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Diablo Rosso III Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 79 77 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 75
Diablo Rosso III: 60% × 71.7 (est.) + 40% × 77.1 = 74
No road tests of dry for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Diablo Rosso III. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
Diablo Rosso III +174Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Diablo Rosso III Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 74 75 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 73
Diablo Rosso III: 60% × 73 (est.) + 40% × 74.9 = 74
No road tests of wet for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Diablo Rosso III. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
72
Comfort
Diablo Rosso III +173Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Diablo Rosso III Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 74 75 ContiSport Attack: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.8 = 72
Diablo Rosso III: 40% × 69.9 (est.) + 60% × 75 = 73
No road tests of comfort for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Diablo Rosso III. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
Level67Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Diablo Rosso III Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 67 67 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
Diablo Rosso III: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Diablo Rosso III. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
Level79Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Diablo Rosso III Reviews found online 79 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSport Attack | Pirelli Diablo Rosso III |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 73 |
| Dry | 75 | 74 |
| Wet | 73 | 74 |
| Comfort | 72 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiSport Attack
Diablo Rosso III
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSport Attack
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Tire B Diablo Rosso III
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and predictable handling at various lean angles
- Improved wet-weather performance compared to more aggressive track-oriented tires
- Fast warm-up times providing immediate confidence
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with some users reporting premature rear tire wear
- Potential for rapid degradation under aggressive riding styles
- Isolated reports of structural issues such as delamination
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSport Attack | B · Pirelli Diablo Rosso III |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSport Attack
Pirelli Diablo Rosso III
Too close to call: Continental ContiSport Attack and Pirelli Diablo Rosso III are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiSport Attack rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli Diablo Rosso III rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSport Attack or Diablo Rosso III?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSport Attack or Diablo Rosso III?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSport Attack or Diablo Rosso III?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSport Attack or Diablo Rosso III?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 73 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ContiSport Attack or Diablo Rosso III?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology