tirewheelguide

Continental ContiSport Attack looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportAttack 2 vs Continental ContiSport Attack — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 7 owner reviews. How we score

ContiSportAttack 2 leads, 77–73 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · ContiSportAttack 2 or ContiSport Attack on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 80

    Dry

    ContiSportAttack 2 +5
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportAttack 2ContiSport Attack
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 73 (est.)
    Reviews found online8779

    ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 87.2 = 80

    ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 75

    No road tests of dry for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 78

    Wet

    ContiSportAttack 2 +5
    73
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportAttack 2ContiSport Attack
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 76 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8174

    ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 76.3 (est.) + 40% × 80.9 = 78

    ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 73

    No road tests of wet for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 78

    Comfort

    ContiSportAttack 2 +6
    72
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportAttack 2ContiSport Attack
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8274

    ContiSportAttack 2: 40% × 71.3 (est.) + 60% × 82.1 = 78

    ContiSport Attack: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.8 = 72

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  4. 67

    Treadwear

    Level
    67
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportAttack 2ContiSport Attack
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6767

    ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67

    ContiSport Attack: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  5. 86

    Handling (owners)

    ContiSportAttack 2 +7
    79
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportAttack 2ContiSport Attack
    Reviews found online8679
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiSportAttack 2Continental ContiSport Attack
Relative Score 77 73
Dry 80 75
Wet 78 73
Comfort 78 72
Treadwear 67 67
Handling (owners) 86 79

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiSportAttack 2

± 8

ContiSport Attack

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportAttack 2

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip levels
  • Very fast warm-up time
  • Predictable and intuitive handling

Cons

  • Short tread life compared to touring-oriented tires
  • High cost-per-mile for daily commuters
  • Rapid rear tire degradation under aggressive throttle application
All owner themes in the ContiSportAttack 2 review

Tire B ContiSport Attack

Pros

  • Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
  • Fast warm-up time
  • Predictable handling characteristics

Cons

  • Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
  • Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
  • Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
All owner themes in the ContiSport Attack review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportAttack 2 B · Continental ContiSport Attack
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typeMotorcycleMotorcycle

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportAttack 2

Continental ContiSport Attack

Narrow edge: Continental ContiSportAttack 2 — better handling, comfort and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSportAttack 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental ContiSport Attack rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 86 vs 79 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 72 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 80 vs 75 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 73 on wet.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportAttack 2
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental ContiSport Attack
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiSportAttack 2 or ContiSport Attack?

Which is better in the wet, ContiSportAttack 2 or ContiSport Attack?

Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportAttack 2 or ContiSport Attack?

Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 80 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiSportAttack 2 or ContiSport Attack?

Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 72 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiSportAttack 2 or ContiSport Attack?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 67 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology