Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 16 reviews
Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22 vs Continental ContiSportAttack 2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 16 + 9 owner reviews. How we score
ContiSportAttack 2 is ahead, 77–71
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 79 · 9 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ContiSportAttack 2 +580Why this score
Source Battlax Hypersport S22 ContiSportAttack 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 79 87 Battlax Hypersport S22: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 78.6 = 75
ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 75.9 (est.) + 40% × 87.2 = 80
No road tests of dry for Battlax Hypersport S22. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
71
Wet
ContiSportAttack 2 +778Why this score
Source Battlax Hypersport S22 ContiSportAttack 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 76 (est.) Reviews found online 72 81 Battlax Hypersport S22: 60% × 71.2 (est.) + 40% × 71.6 = 71
ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 76.3 (est.) + 40% × 80.9 = 78
No road tests of wet for Battlax Hypersport S22. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
69
Comfort
ContiSportAttack 2 +978Why this score
Source Battlax Hypersport S22 ContiSportAttack 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 70 82 Battlax Hypersport S22: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 69.6 = 69
ContiSportAttack 2: 40% × 71.3 (est.) + 60% × 82.1 = 78
No road tests of comfort for Battlax Hypersport S22 or ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
60
Treadwear
ContiSportAttack 2 +767Why this score
Source Battlax Hypersport S22 ContiSportAttack 2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 56 67 Battlax Hypersport S22: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 56 = 60
ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 66.8 (est.) + 40% × 67.2 = 67
No road tests of treadwear for Battlax Hypersport S22. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
78
Handling (owners)
ContiSportAttack 2 +886Why this score
Source Battlax Hypersport S22 ContiSportAttack 2 Reviews found online 78 86
Scores at a glance
| Category | Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22 | Continental ContiSportAttack 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 71 | 77 |
| Dry | 75 | 80 |
| Wet | 71 | 78 |
| Comfort | 69 | 78 |
| Treadwear | 60 | 67 |
| Handling (owners) | 78 | 86 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Battlax Hypersport S22
ContiSportAttack 2
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Battlax Hypersport S22
Pros
- Outstanding dry grip and cornering stability
- Quick and effortless turn-in response with great line precision
- Impressive wet weather performance and stability for a hypersport tire
Cons
- Rapid rear tire wear and quick center flat-spotting on straight roads
- Shorter overall tread life compared to some competing sport tires
- Occasional reports of reduced grip or sliding in wet conditions or when cold
Tire B ContiSportAttack 2
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip levels
- Very fast warm-up time
- Predictable and intuitive handling
Cons
- Short tread life compared to touring-oriented tires
- High cost-per-mile for daily commuters
- Rapid rear tire degradation under aggressive throttle application
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22 | B · Continental ContiSportAttack 2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22
Continental ContiSportAttack 2
Winner: Continental ContiSportAttack 2 — better comfort, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Bridgestone Battlax Hypersport S22 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental ContiSportAttack 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 69 on comfort.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 86 vs 78 on handling.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 71 on wet.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 67 vs 60 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Battlax Hypersport S22 or ContiSportAttack 2?
Which is better in the wet, Battlax Hypersport S22 or ContiSportAttack 2?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 71 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Battlax Hypersport S22 or ContiSportAttack 2?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 80 vs 75 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Battlax Hypersport S22 or ContiSportAttack 2?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 69 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Battlax Hypersport S22 or ContiSportAttack 2?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 67 vs 60 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology