Tests – · none yet Owners 80 · 9 reviews
Michelin Power Cup Evo looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 vs Michelin Power Cup Evo — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 9 + 2 owner reviews. How we score
ContiSportAttack 2 is ahead, 78–68
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 67 · 1 test Owners 67 · 2 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
81
Dry
ContiSportAttack 2 +1368Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Power Cup Evo Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 76 (est.) 67 Reviews found online 88 70 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 76.3 (est.) + 40% × 87.7 = 81
Power Cup Evo: 60% × 67.1 + 40% × 69.7 = 68
No road tests of dry for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
78
Wet
ContiSportAttack 2 +870Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Power Cup Evo Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 81 69 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 76.5 (est.) + 40% × 81.1 = 78
Power Cup Evo: 60% × 69.9 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 70
No road tests of wet for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Power Cup Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
78
Comfort
ContiSportAttack 2 +1068Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Power Cup Evo Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 83 68 ContiSportAttack 2: 40% × 71.6 (est.) + 60% × 82.8 = 78
Power Cup Evo: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.5 = 68
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportAttack 2 or Power Cup Evo. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
ContiSportAttack 2 +364Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Power Cup Evo Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 67 63 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67
Power Cup Evo: 60% × 64.9 (est.) + 40% × 62.6 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Power Cup Evo. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
87
Handling (owners)
ContiSportAttack 2 +1770Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Power Cup Evo Reviews found online 87 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | Michelin Power Cup Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 68 |
| Dry | 81 | 68 |
| Wet | 78 | 70 |
| Comfort | 78 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 87 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
ContiSportAttack 2
68
/ 100
Power Cup Evo
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportAttack 2
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip levels
- Very fast warm-up time
- Predictable and intuitive handling
Cons
- Short tread life compared to touring-oriented tires
- High cost-per-mile for daily commuters
- Rapid rear tire degradation under aggressive throttle application
Tire B Power Cup Evo
Pros
- Exceptional dry grip and handling characteristics
- Performance comparable to dedicated slick tires
- Strong suitability for high-performance chassis setups
Cons
- Limited wet weather performance compared to all-season or dedicated wet-weather tires
- Performance gap when compared to more versatile street-focused tires like the Pilot Sport 4S
- Potential for rapid wear depending on the intensity of the driving style
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | B · Michelin Power Cup Evo |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Continental ContiSportAttack 2
68
/ 100
Michelin Power Cup Evo
Winner: Continental ContiSportAttack 2 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSportAttack 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Power Cup Evo rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 2 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 87 vs 70 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 81 vs 68 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 68 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 70 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ContiSportAttack 2
Tire B · Michelin Power Cup Evo
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSportAttack 2 or Power Cup Evo?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSportAttack 2 or Power Cup Evo?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportAttack 2 or Power Cup Evo?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 81 vs 68 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSportAttack 2 or Power Cup Evo?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSportAttack 2 or Power Cup Evo?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 67 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology