Tests – · none yet Owners 77 · 9 reviews
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 vs Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ContiSportAttack 2 leads, 75–74 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 73 · 1 test Owners 76 · 1 review
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
79
Dry
ContiSportAttack 2 +376Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 ContiRoadAttack 3 Professional tests (TWG score) – 73 Reviews found online 85 80 -
75
Wet
ContiRoadAttack 3 +378Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 ContiRoadAttack 3 Reviews found online 76 81 -
75
Comfort
ContiSportAttack 2 +570Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 ContiRoadAttack 3 Reviews found online 80 71 -
64
Treadwear
ContiRoadAttack 3 +165Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 ContiRoadAttack 3 Reviews found online 64 65 -
84
Handling
ContiSportAttack 2 +579Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 ContiRoadAttack 3 Reviews found online 84 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 75 | 74 |
| Dry | 79 | 76 |
| Wet | 75 | 78 |
| Comfort | 75 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 64 | 65 |
| Handling | 84 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiSportAttack 2
ContiRoadAttack 3
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportAttack 2
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip levels
- Very fast warm-up time
- Predictable and intuitive handling
Cons
- Short tread life compared to touring-oriented tires
- High cost-per-mile for daily commuters
- Rapid rear tire degradation under aggressive throttle application
Tire B ContiRoadAttack 3
Pros
- Excellent grip and performance on paved surfaces
- High level of rider confidence
- Well-suited for sport-touring applications
Cons
- Not suitable for off-road or gravel terrain
- Susceptible to rapid tread damage when used on unpaved surfaces
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | B · Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3
Too close to call: Continental ContiSportAttack 2 and Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiSportAttack 2 is stronger on comfort, handling and dry. Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 is stronger on wet.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 75 vs 70 on comfort.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 84 vs 79 on handling.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 79 vs 76 on dry.
Continental ContiRoadAttack 3 scores 78 vs 75 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.