Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 7 reviews
Continental ContiSport Attack vs Michelin Pilot Power — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
ContiSport Attack is ahead, 72–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 66 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ContiSport Attack +768Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Pilot Power Reviews found online 79 69 -
71
Wet
Pilot Power +172Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Pilot Power Reviews found online 71 73 -
71
Comfort
ContiSport Attack +368Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Pilot Power Reviews found online 74 67 -
65
Treadwear
ContiSport Attack +461Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Pilot Power Reviews found online 65 58 -
78
Handling
ContiSport Attack +1266Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Pilot Power Reviews found online 78 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSport Attack | Michelin Pilot Power |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 67 |
| Dry | 75 | 68 |
| Wet | 71 | 72 |
| Comfort | 71 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 61 |
| Handling | 78 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiSport Attack
Pilot Power
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSport Attack
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Tire B Pilot Power
Pros
- Excellent dry weather grip and confidence
- Strong performance in wet conditions
- Quick warm-up time suitable for road use
Cons
- Limited tread life compared to sport-touring tires
- Lack of tactile feedback at extreme lean angles for some riders
- Tendency for the front tire to deform or lose its profile over time
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSport Attack | B · Michelin Pilot Power |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSport Attack
Michelin Pilot Power
Winner: Continental ContiSport Attack — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 78 vs 66 on handling.
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 75 vs 68 on dry.
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 65 vs 61 on treadwear.
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 71 vs 68 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.