Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 7 reviews
Continental ContiSport Attack looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Michelin Pilot Power looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ContiSport Attack vs Michelin Pilot Power — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
ContiSport Attack is ahead, 73–68
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 11 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ContiSport Attack +669Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Pilot Power Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 79 70 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 75
Pilot Power: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
No road tests of dry for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Pilot Power. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
Level73Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Pilot Power Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 74 74 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 73
Pilot Power: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 73
No road tests of wet for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Pilot Power. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
72
Comfort
ContiSport Attack +567Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Pilot Power Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 74 66 ContiSport Attack: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.8 = 72
Pilot Power: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67
No road tests of comfort for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Power. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
ContiSport Attack +661Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Pilot Power Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 67 57 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
Pilot Power: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Power. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
ContiSport Attack +1564Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Pilot Power Reviews found online 79 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSport Attack | Michelin Pilot Power |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 68 |
| Dry | 75 | 69 |
| Wet | 73 | 73 |
| Comfort | 72 | 67 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
ContiSport Attack
68
/ 100
Pilot Power
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSport Attack
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Tire B Pilot Power
Pros
- Excellent dry weather grip and confidence
- Strong performance in wet conditions
- Quick warm-up time suitable for road use
Cons
- Limited tread life compared to sport-touring tires
- Lack of tactile feedback at extreme lean angles for some riders
- Tendency for the front tire to deform or lose its profile over time
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSport Attack | B · Michelin Pilot Power |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Continental ContiSport Attack
68
/ 100
Michelin Pilot Power
Winner: Continental ContiSport Attack — better handling, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSport Attack rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Pilot Power rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 79 vs 64 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 75 vs 69 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 67 vs 61 on treadwear.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 72 vs 67 on comfort.
Tire A · Continental ContiSport Attack
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Power
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSport Attack or Pilot Power?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSport Attack or Pilot Power?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 73 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSport Attack or Pilot Power?
Continental ContiSport Attack, 75 vs 69 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSport Attack or Pilot Power?
Continental ContiSport Attack, 72 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSport Attack or Pilot Power?
Continental ContiSport Attack, 67 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology