Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 11 reviews
Michelin Pilot Power looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Michelin Pilot Power vs Michelin Power 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
Power 5 leads, 71–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Power 5 +271Why this score
Source Pilot Power Power 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 70 73 Pilot Power: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
Power 5: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for Pilot Power. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
Power 5 +174Why this score
Source Pilot Power Power 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 74 75 Pilot Power: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 73
Power 5: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 74
No road tests of wet for Pilot Power. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Comfort
Power 5 +471Why this score
Source Pilot Power Power 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 66 72 Pilot Power: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67
Power 5: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 71.7 = 71
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Power. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
61
Treadwear
Power 5 +364Why this score
Source Pilot Power Power 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 57 62 Pilot Power: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
Power 5: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Power. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
64
Handling (owners)
Power 5 +973Why this score
Source Pilot Power Power 5 Reviews found online 64 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Power | Michelin Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 71 |
| Dry | 69 | 71 |
| Wet | 73 | 74 |
| Comfort | 67 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Pilot Power
Power 5
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Power
Pros
- Excellent dry weather grip and confidence
- Strong performance in wet conditions
- Quick warm-up time suitable for road use
Cons
- Limited tread life compared to sport-touring tires
- Lack of tactile feedback at extreme lean angles for some riders
- Tendency for the front tire to deform or lose its profile over time
Tire B Power 5
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and stability in standing water
- Rapid warm-up times, even in cooler ambient temperatures
- Agile handling and predictable cornering behavior on public roads
Cons
- Tendency for the rear tire to square off prematurely
- Inconsistent performance and grip degradation as the tire reaches the end of its life
- Lack of confidence at maximum lean angles compared to dedicated track tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Power | B · Michelin Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Pilot Power
Michelin Power 5
Narrow edge: Michelin Power 5 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Pilot Power rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Power 5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Michelin Power 5 scores 73 vs 64 on handling.
Michelin Power 5 scores 71 vs 67 on comfort.
Michelin Power 5 scores 64 vs 61 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pilot Power or Power 5?
Which is better in the wet, Pilot Power or Power 5?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Power or Power 5?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Pilot Power or Power 5?
Michelin Power 5, 71 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Pilot Power or Power 5?
Michelin Power 5, 64 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology