Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 11 reviews
Michelin Pilot Power looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Michelin Pilot Power vs Pirelli Angel GT — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 11 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Angel GT leads, 71–68 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
69
Dry
Angel GT +271Why this score
Source Pilot Power Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 70 72 Pilot Power: 60% × 68.8 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 69
Angel GT: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for Pilot Power. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
Angel GT +174Why this score
Source Pilot Power Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 74 76 Pilot Power: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 73
Angel GT: 60% × 73.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.6 = 74
No road tests of wet for Pilot Power. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
67
Comfort
Angel GT +370Why this score
Source Pilot Power Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 66 71 Pilot Power: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.3 = 67
Angel GT: 40% × 69.1 (est.) + 60% × 70.8 = 70
No road tests of comfort for Pilot Power. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
61
Treadwear
Angel GT +566Why this score
Source Pilot Power Angel GT Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 57 66 Pilot Power: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
Angel GT: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 66.4 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Power. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Angel GT. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
64
Handling (owners)
Angel GT +872Why this score
Source Pilot Power Angel GT Reviews found online 64 72
Scores at a glance
| Category | Michelin Pilot Power | Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 68 | 71 |
| Dry | 69 | 71 |
| Wet | 73 | 74 |
| Comfort | 67 | 70 |
| Treadwear | 61 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 72 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Pilot Power
Angel GT
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Pilot Power
Pros
- Excellent dry weather grip and confidence
- Strong performance in wet conditions
- Quick warm-up time suitable for road use
Cons
- Limited tread life compared to sport-touring tires
- Lack of tactile feedback at extreme lean angles for some riders
- Tendency for the front tire to deform or lose its profile over time
Tire B Angel GT
Pros
- Exceptional grip and confidence in wet conditions
- Quick warm-up times
- Enhances rider confidence and offers great handling performance
Cons
- Lower than expected mileage and rapid wear reported by some users
- Front tire shoulder wear issues on heavier sport-touring bikes if the correct 'A' spec is not used
- Handling and tracking complaints on certain lighter or specific bike models compared to stock tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Power | B · Pirelli Angel GT |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Michelin Pilot Power
Pirelli Angel GT
Narrow edge: Pirelli Angel GT — better handling, treadwear and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Michelin Pilot Power rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 11 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli Angel GT rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pirelli Angel GT scores 72 vs 64 on handling.
Pirelli Angel GT scores 66 vs 61 on treadwear.
Pirelli Angel GT scores 70 vs 67 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Pilot Power or Angel GT?
Which is better in the wet, Pilot Power or Angel GT?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Power or Angel GT?
Neither, by our numbers: 69 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, Pilot Power or Angel GT?
Pirelli Angel GT, 70 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Pilot Power or Angel GT?
Pirelli Angel GT, 66 vs 61 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology