Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 7 reviews
Continental ContiSport Attack looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ContiSport Attack vs Michelin Power 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 7 + 16 owner reviews. How we score
ContiSport Attack leads, 73–71 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
ContiSport Attack +471Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Power 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 73 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 79 73 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 75
Power 5: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 71
No road tests of dry for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
Power 5 +174Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Power 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 74 75 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 73
Power 5: 60% × 72.9 (est.) + 40% × 74.7 = 74
No road tests of wet for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
72
Comfort
ContiSport Attack +171Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Power 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 74 72 ContiSport Attack: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.8 = 72
Power 5: 40% × 69.3 (est.) + 60% × 71.7 = 71
No road tests of comfort for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
ContiSport Attack +364Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Power 5 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 67 62 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
Power 5: 60% × 64.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Power 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
ContiSport Attack +673Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Power 5 Reviews found online 79 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSport Attack | Michelin Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 71 |
| Dry | 75 | 71 |
| Wet | 73 | 74 |
| Comfort | 72 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
73
/ 100
ContiSport Attack
71
/ 100
Power 5
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSport Attack
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Tire B Power 5
Pros
- Exceptional wet-weather grip and stability in standing water
- Rapid warm-up times, even in cooler ambient temperatures
- Agile handling and predictable cornering behavior on public roads
Cons
- Tendency for the rear tire to square off prematurely
- Inconsistent performance and grip degradation as the tire reaches the end of its life
- Lack of confidence at maximum lean angles compared to dedicated track tires
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSport Attack | B · Michelin Power 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
73
/ 100
Continental ContiSport Attack
71
/ 100
Michelin Power 5
Narrow edge: Continental ContiSport Attack — better handling, dry and treadwear. Where the Michelin Power 5 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Continental ContiSport Attack rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Michelin Power 5 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 16 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 79 vs 73 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 75 vs 71 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the longest tread life
Continental ContiSport Attack scores 67 vs 64 on treadwear.
Tire A · Continental ContiSport Attack
Tire B · Michelin Power 5
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSport Attack or Power 5?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSport Attack or Power 5?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 74 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSport Attack or Power 5?
Continental ContiSport Attack, 75 vs 71 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSport Attack or Power 5?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ContiSport Attack or Power 5?
Continental ContiSport Attack, 67 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology