Tests – · none yet Owners 74 · 7 reviews
Continental ContiSport Attack looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental ContiSport Attack vs Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 7 + 182 owner reviews. How we score
Diablo Rosso IV leads, 77–73 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 81 · 182 reviews
Best test result: #5 of 12 in 2025 Sport and Hypersport Motorcycle Tyre Test (wet handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
Level75Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Diablo Rosso IV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 73 (est.) 68 Reviews found online 79 86 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 79.1 = 75
Diablo Rosso IV: 60% × 67.8 + 40% × 86.3 = 75
No road tests of dry for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
73
Wet
Diablo Rosso IV +982Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Diablo Rosso IV Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 81 Reviews found online 74 83 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.7 = 73
Diablo Rosso IV: 60% × 81.4 + 40% × 82.5 = 82
No road tests of wet for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
72
Comfort
Diablo Rosso IV +476Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Diablo Rosso IV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 74 80 ContiSport Attack: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 73.8 = 72
Diablo Rosso IV: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 80.1 = 76
No road tests of comfort for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Diablo Rosso IV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
67
Treadwear
Diablo Rosso IV +370Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Diablo Rosso IV Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 67 71 ContiSport Attack: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 67
Diablo Rosso IV: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.4 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSport Attack. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Diablo Rosso IV. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
Diablo Rosso IV +786Why this score
Source ContiSport Attack Diablo Rosso IV Reviews found online 79 86
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSport Attack | Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 77 |
| Dry | 75 | 75 |
| Wet | 73 | 82 |
| Comfort | 72 | 76 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 86 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiSport Attack
Diablo Rosso IV
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSport Attack
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering confidence
- Fast warm-up time
- Predictable handling characteristics
Cons
- Short tread life, particularly under aggressive use
- Inconsistent wet-weather performance compared to dedicated touring tires
- Potential for rapid center-tread degradation
Tire B Diablo Rosso IV
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip with a high level of rider confidence
- Fast warm-up time and predictable handling at deep lean angles
- Improved steering precision and turn-in compared to previous generations like the Diablo Rosso III
Cons
- Higher price point compared to some competitors and previous models
- Noticeable reduction in grip and increased rear wheel spin as the tires wear down
- Requires full operating temperature for optimal performance late in its life cycle
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSport Attack | B · Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSport Attack
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV
Narrow edge: Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV — better wet, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSport Attack rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 7 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV scores 82 vs 73 on wet.
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV scores 86 vs 79 on handling.
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV scores 76 vs 72 on comfort.
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV scores 70 vs 67 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSport Attack or Diablo Rosso IV?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSport Attack or Diablo Rosso IV?
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV, 82 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSport Attack or Diablo Rosso IV?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 75 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSport Attack or Diablo Rosso IV?
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV, 76 vs 72 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSport Attack or Diablo Rosso IV?
Pirelli Diablo Rosso IV, 70 vs 67 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology