Tests – · none yet Owners 80 · 9 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 vs Pirelli Angel ST — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 143 owner reviews. How we score
ContiSportAttack 2 is ahead, 78–67
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
81
Dry
ContiSportAttack 2 +1566Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 88 65 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 76.3 (est.) + 40% × 87.7 = 81
Angel ST: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 64.5 = 66
No road tests of dry for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
78
Wet
ContiSportAttack 2 +870Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 81 70 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 76.5 (est.) + 40% × 81.1 = 78
Angel ST: 60% × 70.3 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 70
No road tests of wet for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
78
Comfort
ContiSportAttack 2 +1068Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 83 68 ContiSportAttack 2: 40% × 71.6 (est.) + 60% × 82.7 = 78
Angel ST: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 68 = 68
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportAttack 2 or Angel ST. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
ContiSportAttack 2 +364Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Angel ST Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 67 63 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 67.1 = 67
Angel ST: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 63.4 = 64
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Angel ST. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
87
Handling (owners)
ContiSportAttack 2 +2166Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Angel ST Reviews found online 87 66
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 67 |
| Dry | 81 | 66 |
| Wet | 78 | 70 |
| Comfort | 78 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 64 |
| Handling (owners) | 87 | 66 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
78
/ 100
ContiSportAttack 2
67
/ 100
Angel ST
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportAttack 2
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip levels
- Very fast warm-up time
- Predictable and intuitive handling
Cons
- Short tread life compared to touring-oriented tires
- High cost-per-mile for daily commuters
- Rapid rear tire degradation under aggressive throttle application
Tire B Angel ST
Pros
- Excellent dry grip and high cornering confidence
- Reliable and predictable wet weather performance
- Light, neutral steering and overall straight-line stability
Cons
- Rear tire tends to wear out suddenly or rapidly once it passes the halfway mark
- Requires a short warm-up time (2-5 minutes) to reach optimal grip
- Shorter total mileage lifespan reported by aggressive riders or heavy commuters
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | B · Pirelli Angel ST |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
78
/ 100
Continental ContiSportAttack 2
67
/ 100
Pirelli Angel ST
Winner: Continental ContiSportAttack 2 — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSportAttack 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 87 vs 66 on handling.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 81 vs 66 on dry.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 68 on comfort.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 70 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ContiSportAttack 2
Tire B · Pirelli Angel ST
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSportAttack 2 or Angel ST?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSportAttack 2 or Angel ST?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 70 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportAttack 2 or Angel ST?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 81 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSportAttack 2 or Angel ST?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSportAttack 2 or Angel ST?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 67 vs 64 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology