Tests – · none yet Owners 80 · 9 reviews
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 vs Pirelli Diablo Rosso II — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 9 + 19 owner reviews. How we score
ContiSportAttack 2 is ahead, 78–73
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 73 · 19 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
81
Dry
ContiSportAttack 2 +675Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Diablo Rosso II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 88 79 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 76.3 (est.) + 40% × 87.7 = 81
Diablo Rosso II: 60% × 72.7 (est.) + 40% × 79 = 75
No road tests of dry for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
No road tests of dry for Diablo Rosso II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
78
Wet
ContiSportAttack 2 +672Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Diablo Rosso II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 76 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 81 73 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 76.5 (est.) + 40% × 81.1 = 78
Diablo Rosso II: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 72.9 = 72
No road tests of wet for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Diablo Rosso II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
78
Comfort
ContiSportAttack 2 +474Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Diablo Rosso II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 72 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 83 76 ContiSportAttack 2: 40% × 71.6 (est.) + 60% × 82.8 = 78
Diablo Rosso II: 40% × 70.3 (est.) + 60% × 75.7 = 74
No road tests of comfort for ContiSportAttack 2 or Diablo Rosso II. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
67
Treadwear
ContiSportAttack 2 +166Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Diablo Rosso II Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 67 67 ContiSportAttack 2: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 67 = 67
Diablo Rosso II: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 66.6 = 66
No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportAttack 2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Diablo Rosso II. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
87
Handling (owners)
ContiSportAttack 2 +978Why this score
Source ContiSportAttack 2 Diablo Rosso II Reviews found online 87 78
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | Pirelli Diablo Rosso II |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 78 | 73 |
| Dry | 81 | 75 |
| Wet | 78 | 72 |
| Comfort | 78 | 74 |
| Treadwear | 67 | 66 |
| Handling (owners) | 87 | 78 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
ContiSportAttack 2
Diablo Rosso II
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportAttack 2
Pros
- Exceptional dry and wet grip levels
- Very fast warm-up time
- Predictable and intuitive handling
Cons
- Short tread life compared to touring-oriented tires
- High cost-per-mile for daily commuters
- Rapid rear tire degradation under aggressive throttle application
Tire B Diablo Rosso II
Pros
- Exceptional dry-weather grip and cornering stability
- Rapid warm-up time for immediate performance
- Predictable handling and high levels of rider feedback
Cons
- Inconsistent tread life, with reports of rapid center wear and cupping
- Polarized wet-weather performance ranging from 'glue-like' to 'dangerous'
- Tendency for the rear tire to square off over time
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportAttack 2 | B · Pirelli Diablo Rosso II |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Motorcycle | Motorcycle |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2
Pirelli Diablo Rosso II
Winner: Continental ContiSportAttack 2 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiSportAttack 2 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Pirelli Diablo Rosso II rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 19 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 87 vs 78 on handling.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 81 vs 75 on dry.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 72 on wet.
Continental ContiSportAttack 2 scores 78 vs 74 on comfort.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiSportAttack 2 or Diablo Rosso II?
Which is better in the wet, ContiSportAttack 2 or Diablo Rosso II?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 72 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportAttack 2 or Diablo Rosso II?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 81 vs 75 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiSportAttack 2 or Diablo Rosso II?
Continental ContiSportAttack 2, 78 vs 74 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiSportAttack 2 or Diablo Rosso II?
Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 66 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology