Tests – · none yet Owners 42 · 1 review
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ContiSportContact 3 SSR vs Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): 60% professional tests, 40% owner reviews.
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 85 · 18 tests Owners 78 · 3,595 reviews
“F1 Asy 5s on my S204. I can confirm they are pretty decent and have coped well with the tarmac-ripping 154hp and 184 lbs-ft torque of the M274 fitted to my wagon”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
–
Dry
No comparison84Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 SSR Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 84 Reviews found online – 83 -
–
Wet
No comparison87Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 SSR Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 91 Reviews found online – 82 -
–
Comfort
No comparison85Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 SSR Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 93 Reviews found online – 73 -
–
Noise
No comparison72Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 SSR Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 75 Reviews found online – 67 -
–
Treadwear
No comparison76Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 SSR Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Professional tests (TWG score) – 80 Reviews found online – 70 -
–
Handling
No comparison81Why this score
Source ContiSportContact 3 SSR Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 Reviews found online – 81
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiSportContact 3 SSR | Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | – | 82 |
| Dry | – | 84 |
| Wet | – | 87 |
| Comfort | – | 85 |
| Noise | – | 72 |
| Treadwear | – | 76 |
| Handling | – | 81 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip and treadwear start at “Important” — the two things buyers rank highest. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Less important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Important
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Neutral
NoneLessNeutralMoreMost
Recomputed
Headline score
–
/ 100
ContiSportContact 3 SSR
82
/ 100
Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiSportContact 3 SSR
Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.
Tire B Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Pros
- Exceptional wet and dry grip
- Precise steering response and high-speed stability
- Strong value for money compared to tier-one rivals
Cons
- Faster-than-expected tread wear for some aggressive drivers
- Notable road noise on coarse or concrete road surfaces
- Stiffer sidewalls can lead to a harsher ride quality on certain vehicles
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental ContiSportContact 3 SSR
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Positive
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Community members generally view the Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 very positively, frequently praising its wet grip, cold weather performance, and steering feel when compared to rivals like Michelin Pilot Sport 4 and Pirelli P Zero. While some users find them exceptionally quiet, others note moderate road noise or low-speed scrubbing on full lock.
taycanforum.com
·1 upvote ·2026-04-06
“2024 J1.1 GTS Sport Turismo on 21" Spyder RS wheels here. Went from Pirelli PZero's to NF1 Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5's recently. They don't seem any louder than the PZero's, dry grip seems about the same, as does comfort. Wet grip and performance in cold conditions (I'm in Scotland, UK) over the PZero's is noticeably better. Very little in the way of the Ackerman effect in cold temperatures, compared to the PZero's which made an awful noise and skipped badly when turning at slow speeds, pulling out of junctions. Will see how they do wear rate wise, PZero's had about 2.5 to 3mm left at 16k miles. Anything approaching that on the ASY5's would be good. Unfortunately on the J1.1 on 21"'s the choice is essentially PZero's or ASY5's. Which is disappointing as I had PS4S's and CSC7's on my previous cars (G81 M3 and M340i Touring) and they were fantastic.”
forums.mbclub.co.uk
·2023-01-26
“I have them fitted in both my cars (Audi A6 and CLK350). Neither had the performance of your AMG but I can confirm they are the best tyres I’ve ever had in terms of grip and feel.”
Top themes
#wet grip performance#comparison to Michelin PS4#road noise levels#cold temperature handling#full lock scrubbing
Based on 13 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiSportContact 3 SSR | B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | — | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 6 | 64 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 19″ | 17″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 7 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 A A | 300 - 500 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Serrated Black Lettering |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
–
/ 100
Continental ContiSportContact 3 SSR
82
/ 100
Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
Only Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5 has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.
Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 3 SSR
Tire B · Goodyear Eagle F1 Asymmetric 5
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score.