tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 27 + 33 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: ContiSportContact 5 and Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat are level at 62.

Check price on Amazon · ContiSportContact 5 Check price on Amazon · Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 65

    Dry

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat +1
    66
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6364

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.7 = 65

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 66

    No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 67

    Wet

    ContiSportContact 5 +2
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6764

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 68 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 67

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 63.5 = 65

    No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 66

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)–
    Reviews found online63–

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 67.7 (est.) + 40% × 63.3 = 66

    No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    ContiSportContact 5 +5
    58
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 65 (est.)
    Reviews found online5748

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 56.8 = 63

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 65.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.6 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5 or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 68

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online69–

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 69.2 = 68

    No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 53

    Treadwear

    ContiSportContact 5 +3
    50
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 57 (est.)
    Reviews found online4539

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 59.2 (est.) + 40% × 44.6 = 53

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat: 60% × 57.4 (est.) + 40% × 38.8 = 50

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 53

    Handling (owners)

    Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat +8
    61
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
    Reviews found online5361
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Relative Score 62 62
Dry 65 66
Wet 67 65
Snow 66 –
Comfort 63 58
Noise 68 –
Treadwear 53 50
Handling (owners) 53 61

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ContiSportContact 5

Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportContact 5

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat

Pros

  • Exceptional dry and wet grip with responsive handling
  • Precise steering feedback and cornering stability
  • Acts as a reliable, secure OEM choice for European sport sedans and SUVs

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short overall lifespan
  • Firm, harsh ride quality that transmits impacts over rough roads and potholes
  • Elevated road noise as the tires age
All owner themes in the Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 B · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
CategorySummer tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available86—
Rim diameters17″ – 22″—
Tread depth8 - 10/32″—
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportContact 5

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat

Too close to call: Continental ContiSportContact 5 and Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat are within 2 points overall. Continental ContiSportContact 5 is stronger on comfort and treadwear. Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat is stronger on handling.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat scores 61 vs 53 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 63 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 53 vs 50 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Continental Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiSportContact 5 or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5 or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Neither, by our numbers: 67 vs 65 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5 or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 66 on the dry score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5 or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Continental ContiSportContact 5, 63 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5 or Sport Contact 5 SSR Runflat?

Continental ContiSportContact 5, 53 vs 50 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology