tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportContact 5 vs Yokohama Advan Sport V107 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 10 road tests and 27 + 166 owner reviews. How we score

Advan Sport V107 leads, 68–66 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Advan Sport V107 or ContiSportContact 5 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Tire BYokohama

Advan Sport V107

Summer

± 6

Tests 70 · 10 tests Owners 57 · 166 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2025 Auto Express Summer Tyre Test (dry braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 67

    Dry

    Advan Sport V107 +18
    85
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Advan Sport V107
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests≈ 67 (est.)98
    Reviews found online6665

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 67.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.1 = 67

    Advan Sport V107: 60% × 97.6 + 40% × 64.9 = 85

    No road tests of dry for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 71

    Wet

    Advan Sport V107 +4
    75
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Advan Sport V107
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests≈ 71 (est.)83
    Reviews found online7164

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 71.1 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 71

    Advan Sport V107: 60% × 82.6 + 40% × 63.9 = 75

    No road tests of wet for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 68

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Advan Sport V107
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)–
    Reviews found online67–

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 69.2 (est.) + 40% × 66.5 = 68

    No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 63

    Comfort

    ContiSportContact 5 +16
    47
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Advan Sport V107
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 67 (est.)42
    Reviews found online6150

    ContiSportContact 5: 40% × 67.2 (est.) + 60% × 61 = 63

    Advan Sport V107: 40% × 41.7 + 60% × 49.9 = 47

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.21).

  5. 69

    Noise

    ContiSportContact 5 +19
    50
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Advan Sport V107
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 66 (est.)43
    Reviews found online7461

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 69

    Advan Sport V107: 60% × 43.3 + 40% × 60.9 = 50

    No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 56

    Treadwear

    ContiSportContact 5 +11
    45
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Advan Sport V107
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 61 (est.)47
    Reviews found online5042

    ContiSportContact 5: 60% × 60.6 (est.) + 40% × 50 = 56

    Advan Sport V107: 60% × 46.6 + 40% × 42.2 = 45

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. –

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    65
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Advan Sport V107
    Reviews found online–65
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    10
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5Advan Sport V107
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests–10
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Relative Score 66 68
Dry 67 85
Wet 71 75
Snow 68 –
Comfort 63 47
Noise 69 50
Treadwear 56 45
Handling (owners) – 65
Efficiency – 10

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ContiSportContact 5

± 6

Advan Sport V107

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportContact 5

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

Tire B Advan Sport V107

Pros

  • Exceptional dry grip and high-speed stability
  • Stiff sidewalls providing direct and responsive steering
  • Competitively priced compared to tier-1 performance alternatives

Cons

  • Rapid tread wear and short lifespan (often lasting between 5,000 to 12,000 miles)
  • Noticeable road noise on certain rough or worn highway surfaces
  • Reduced grip in very cold temperatures or standing water as the tire ages
All owner themes in the Advan Sport V107 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5 B · Yokohama Advan Sport V107
CategorySummer tireSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available86136
Rim diameters17″ – 22″16″ – 24″
Tread depth8 - 10/32″8/32″
UTQG280 - 420 A - AA A240 A A
SidewallBlack Side WallBlackwall
Max pressure50 - 51 psi50 psi
Sizes in common5252

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportContact 5

Yokohama Advan Sport V107

Narrow edge: Yokohama Advan Sport V107 — better dry and wet. Pick the Continental ContiSportContact 5 if noise, comfort and treadwear matter most to you.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 69 vs 50 on noise.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Yokohama Advan Sport V107 scores 85 vs 67 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 63 vs 47 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental ContiSportContact 5 scores 56 vs 45 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Yokohama Advan Sport V107
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiSportContact 5 or Advan Sport V107?

Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5 or Advan Sport V107?

Yokohama Advan Sport V107, 75 vs 71 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5 or Advan Sport V107?

Yokohama Advan Sport V107, 85 vs 67 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ContiSportContact 5 or Advan Sport V107?

Continental ContiSportContact 5, 69 vs 50 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5 or Advan Sport V107?

Continental ContiSportContact 5, 63 vs 47 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5 or Advan Sport V107?

Continental ContiSportContact 5, 56 vs 45 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology