tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportContact 5P vs Hankook Ventus Prime K105 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 123 + 20 owner reviews. How we score

ContiSportContact 5P leads, 62–60 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · ContiSportContact 5P or Ventus Prime K105 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ContiSportContact 5P
Tire AContinental

ContiSportContact 5P

Summer

± 6

Tests 78 · 1 test Owners 48 · 123 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    ContiSportContact 5P +10
    61
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5PVentus Prime K105
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests78≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online5957

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 59.2 = 71

    Ventus Prime K105: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61

    No road tests of dry for Ventus Prime K105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 69

    Wet

    ContiSportContact 5P +9
    60
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5PVentus Prime K105
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests77≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online5857

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 58.2 = 69

    Ventus Prime K105: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 60

    No road tests of wet for Ventus Prime K105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5PVentus Prime K105
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)–
    Reviews found online43–

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 42.7 = 53

    No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 55

    Comfort

    Ventus Prime K105 +8
    63
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5PVentus Prime K105
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online4960

    ContiSportContact 5P: 40% × 65.4 (est.) + 60% × 48.6 = 55

    Ventus Prime K105: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 59.9 = 63

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5P or Ventus Prime K105. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 59

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5PVentus Prime K105
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online49–

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.5 = 59

    No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5P. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 43

    Treadwear

    Ventus Prime K105 +14
    57
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5PVentus Prime K105
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online2851

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 52.7 (est.) + 40% × 27.9 = 43

    Ventus Prime K105: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ventus Prime K105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    ContiSportContact 5P +2
    54
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5PVentus Prime K105
    Reviews found online5654
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5PHankook Ventus Prime K105
Relative Score 62 60
Dry 71 61
Wet 69 60
Snow 53 –
Comfort 55 63
Noise 59 –
Treadwear 43 57
Handling (owners) 56 54

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

ContiSportContact 5P

± 8

Ventus Prime K105

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportContact 5P

Pros

  • Outstanding dry and wet traction providing confidence-inspiring grip
  • High level of steering feedback and precise high-speed cornering ability
  • Excellent ride comfort and bump absorption for an ultra-high-performance tire

Cons

  • Rapid and excessively fast tread wear, with many users replacing them under 10,000 miles
  • Prone to straight-line wheel spin and wheel hop during hard acceleration
  • Noticeable road noise as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the ContiSportContact 5P review

Tire B Ventus Prime K105

Pros

  • High level of ride comfort and low road noise
  • Excellent value for money compared to premium alternatives
  • Good longevity and tread life for standard commuting

Cons

  • Inconsistent and often criticized wet-weather grip
  • Lack of steering precision and poor turn-in response
  • Not suitable for aggressive or sports-oriented driving
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime K105 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5P B · Hankook Ventus Prime K105
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available41—
Rim diameters18″ – 22″—
Tread depth8 - 10/32″—
UTQG240 - 280 AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportContact 5P

Hankook Ventus Prime K105

Narrow edge: Continental ContiSportContact 5P — better dry and wet. Pick the Hankook Ventus Prime K105 if treadwear and comfort matter most to you.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus Prime K105 scores 57 vs 43 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental ContiSportContact 5P scores 71 vs 61 on dry.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental ContiSportContact 5P scores 69 vs 60 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Hankook Ventus Prime K105 scores 63 vs 55 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5P
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime K105
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiSportContact 5P or Ventus Prime K105?

Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5P or Ventus Prime K105?

Continental ContiSportContact 5P, 69 vs 60 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5P or Ventus Prime K105?

Continental ContiSportContact 5P, 71 vs 61 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5P or Ventus Prime K105?

Hankook Ventus Prime K105, 63 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5P or Ventus Prime K105?

Hankook Ventus Prime K105, 57 vs 43 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology