Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 20 reviews
Hankook Ventus Prime K105 vs Continental PremiumContact 6 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 42 road tests and 20 + 2,350 owner reviews. How we score
PremiumContact 6 is ahead, 82–60
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 84 · 42 tests Owners 75 · 2,350 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 50 in 2023 ADAC Summer Tyre Test (wet braking)
“My continental premium contact 6’s getting to end or ? I am using these for the last 3 years and drove 46K km on them. Treadwear indicator for 3mm is getting very close. Should I rush or let them run for maybe another 5-10K ? Read more”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
61
Dry
PremiumContact 6 +2384Why this score
Source Ventus Prime K105 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 39 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 57 79 Ventus Prime K105: 60% × 63.6 (est.) + 40% × 57.3 = 61
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 87.6 + 40% × 78.5 = 84
No road tests of dry for Ventus Prime K105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
60
Wet
PremiumContact 6 +2686Why this score
Source Ventus Prime K105 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 40 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 89 Reviews found online 57 81 Ventus Prime K105: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 56.7 = 60
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 89 + 40% × 80.6 = 86
No road tests of wet for Ventus Prime K105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison75Why this score
Source Ventus Prime K105 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online – 77 PremiumContact 6: 60% × 73.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.4 = 75
No road tests of snow for PremiumContact 6. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
63
Comfort
PremiumContact 6 +1376Why this score
Source Ventus Prime K105 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 82 Reviews found online 60 72 Ventus Prime K105: 40% × 67.5 (est.) + 60% × 59.9 = 63
PremiumContact 6: 40% × 81.8 + 60% × 71.5 = 76
No road tests of comfort for Ventus Prime K105. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison55Why this score
Source Ventus Prime K105 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests – 43 Reviews found online – 73 PremiumContact 6: 60% × 43 + 40% × 72.7 = 55
-
57
Treadwear
PremiumContact 6 +2279Why this score
Source Ventus Prime K105 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests ≈ 61 (est.) 88 Reviews found online 51 65 Ventus Prime K105: 60% × 60.8 (est.) + 40% × 51 = 57
PremiumContact 6: 60% × 88.3 + 40% × 64.9 = 79
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus Prime K105. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
54
Handling (owners)
PremiumContact 6 +2478Why this score
Source Ventus Prime K105 PremiumContact 6 Reviews found online 54 78 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison74Why this score
Source Ventus Prime K105 PremiumContact 6 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 25 tests – 74
Scores at a glance
| Category | Hankook Ventus Prime K105 | Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 60 | 82 |
| Dry | 61 | 84 |
| Wet | 60 | 86 |
| Snow | – | 75 |
| Comfort | 63 | 76 |
| Noise | – | 55 |
| Treadwear | 57 | 79 |
| Handling (owners) | 54 | 78 |
| Efficiency | – | 74 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Ventus Prime K105
PremiumContact 6
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Ventus Prime K105
Pros
- High level of ride comfort and low road noise
- Excellent value for money compared to premium alternatives
- Good longevity and tread life for standard commuting
Cons
- Inconsistent and often criticized wet-weather grip
- Lack of steering precision and poor turn-in response
- Not suitable for aggressive or sports-oriented driving
Tire B PremiumContact 6
Pros
- Exceptional grip and short braking distances on both dry and wet road surfaces
- Precise steering response and predictable handling near the limit
- High level of high-speed stability and driver confidence
Cons
- Faster tread wear and shorter lifespan reported by spirited drivers
- Increased road noise and harshness on coarse or rough asphalt
- Softer sidewalls can result in less immediate turn-in sharpness compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Hankook Ventus Prime K105
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Continental PremiumContact 6
Community feedback for the Continental Premium Contact 6 is largely positive, with drivers consistently praising its strong wet and dry grip, safety, and braking performance. Some users note softer sidewalls compared to dedicated ultra-high-performance tires and express concerns regarding premium pricing or wear rates. Overall, it is viewed as a capable, high-performing summer tire that balances comfort and traction effectively.
“I had the conti PC6 on my old F56 JCW running 300bhp/324lb-ft. 17" 215/45 Found them great In the wet, although the sidewalls were rather soggy compared to the previous Michelin Supersport, which admittedly are more of a UHP tyre”
“Well having 4 tyres to change on the Polestar 2 at the same time - and the OE spec Continental Premium Contact 6 tyres being $1020 each!!! (wtf are they made from?) I went with Pirelli Dragon Sports - same 99YXL weight rating - higher speed rating. Noise - no difference at all. Efficiency - nothing I can see from a week of driving. The car's trip average kWh/100km hasn't budged. Wear? Well the Contis lasted 22k km on the front and 44k km on the rear so who knows? Couldn't be worse, could it? Traction - same in the dry and I haven't noticed any difference in the wet but haven't been hooning it...Oh - and they were $290 each balanced and fitted.”
“In the case of summer tyres nope at the part of the market things haven't changed THAT MUCH... But there are now better tyres, smoother, quieter better handling..the Conti Premium Contact 6 on my cars was a noticeable improvement.. Price can be a major variable..not sure how they price out.. Assy 6 and PS5s are both in the same space as the Conti Premium 6.. Again had Assy 5 and it was a very good tyre..the Assy 6 is even better.. Each turn of the design just keeps getting better..the R+Ts are just old designs..things have moved on..BUT NOT THAT MUCH!”
Based on 16 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Hankook Ventus Prime K105 | B · Continental PremiumContact 6 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 113 |
| Rim diameters | — | 15″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 8 - 9/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 280 A - AA A |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Hankook Ventus Prime K105
Continental PremiumContact 6
Winner: Continental PremiumContact 6 — better wet, handling and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 86 vs 60 on wet.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 78 vs 54 on handling.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 84 vs 61 on dry.
Continental PremiumContact 6 scores 79 vs 57 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Ventus Prime K105 or PremiumContact 6?
Which is better in the wet, Ventus Prime K105 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 86 vs 60 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Ventus Prime K105 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 84 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Ventus Prime K105 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 76 vs 63 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Ventus Prime K105 or PremiumContact 6?
Continental PremiumContact 6, 79 vs 57 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology