Head-to-head Updated

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Continental ContiSportContact 5P — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 21 + 1 road tests and 12,714 + 123 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 4 is ahead, 82–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire AMichelin

Pilot Sport 4

Summer

± 4

Tests 85 · 21 tests Owners 76 · 12,714 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 45 in 2019 Summer 53 Tyre Braking Shootout (dry braking)

“Those are Pilot sport 4 (all season). If it had s after the 4 it would be the summer high performance version. I put the pilot sport 4 on wife's GTI autobahn 2016. Great handling tire, stiff side walls, not the smoothest ride but best overall.”

Continental ContiSportContact 5P
± 6

Tests 78 · 1 test Owners 48 · 123 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test (wet braking)

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 87

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 4 +17
    70
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4ContiSportContact 5P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 1 tests8978
    Reviews found online8459

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 89.3 + 40% × 83.9 = 87

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 78.4 + 40% × 58.6 = 70

  2. 89

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 4 +20
    69
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4ContiSportContact 5P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 20 / 1 tests9277
    Reviews found online8458

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 92.5 + 40% × 84.4 = 89

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 76.7 + 40% × 57.8 = 69

  3. –

    Snow

    No comparison
    53
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4ContiSportContact 5P
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online–42

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 61.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.7 = 53

    No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 4 +22
    54
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4ContiSportContact 5P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 6 / – tests82≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7248

    Pilot Sport 4: 40% × 81.6 + 60% × 71.7 = 76

    ContiSportContact 5P: 40% × 64.5 (est.) + 60% × 47.7 = 54

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5P. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 70

    Noise

    Pilot Sport 4 +11
    59
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4ContiSportContact 5P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 13 / – tests73≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online≈ 66 (est.)48

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 73.2 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 70

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 47.8 = 59

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

    No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5P. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 4 +28
    43
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4ContiSportContact 5P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 3 / – tests78≈ 53 (est.)
    Reviews found online6028

    Pilot Sport 4: 60% × 78.1 + 40% × 59.5 = 71

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 52.7 (est.) + 40% × 28.2 = 43

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 81

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 4 +26
    55
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4ContiSportContact 5P
    Reviews found online8155
  8. 76

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourcePilot Sport 4ContiSportContact 5P
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 14 / – tests76–
Scores at a glance
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 vs Continental ContiSportContact 5P: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryMichelin Pilot Sport 4Continental ContiSportContact 5P
Relative Score 82 62
Dry 87 70
Wet 89 69
Snow – 53
Comfort 76 54
Noise 70 59
Treadwear 71 43
Handling (owners) 81 55
Efficiency 76 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 4

Pilot Sport 4

± 6

ContiSportContact 5P

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryPilot Sport 4ContiSportContact 5PΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 80% #3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 100% #1/9 · 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Dry Handling Dry 80% #3/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 100% #2/9 · 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Wet Braking Wet 70% #8/9 · 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 100% #1/9 · 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #7/9 2022 AUTO Straßenverkehr Summer Tire Test R19 #1/9 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Pilot Sport 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry traction with outstanding resistance to aquaplaning
  • Noticeable improvement in ride comfort and a reduction in cabin noise compared to standard run-flat tires
  • Progressive and predictable breakaway limits during spirited driving

Cons

  • Faster-than-average treadwear, particularly under aggressive driving or on rear-wheel-drive performance cars
  • Softer sidewalls can lead to a slight lack of initial steering precision and a vague feel at the limit for hardcore enthusiasts
  • Performance drops off significantly in cold, freezing, or snowy winter conditions
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 4 review

Tire B ContiSportContact 5P

Pros

  • Outstanding dry and wet traction providing confidence-inspiring grip
  • High level of steering feedback and precise high-speed cornering ability
  • Excellent ride comfort and bump absorption for an ultra-high-performance tire

Cons

  • Rapid and excessively fast tread wear, with many users replacing them under 10,000 miles
  • Prone to straight-line wheel spin and wheel hop during hard acceleration
  • Noticeable road noise as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the ContiSportContact 5P review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Positive

The community widely regards the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 line as a premium upgrade offering exceptional dry and wet grip, precise handling, and superior ride comfort compared to OEM or run-flat tires. While celebrated for performance, users frequently discuss its high price tag, faster treadwear, and noticeable drop in EV efficiency. Some drivers also note increased road noise and reduced traction when temperatures drop near freezing.

r/JettaGLI ·59 upvotes ·2026-09-27

“Reminder: Tires are the key to this car Just replaced my Michelin Pilot Sport 4 AS tires with a new set ahead of the rainy season. Lasted 36K miles. It was the best mod to the car and a fresh set reminded just how good a brand new set is. The car is glued to the road, riding wonderfully smooth and quiet. Spend the money, get the best tires for you. The tune can wait. And it will need it.”

r/BoltEV ·5 upvotes ·2026-04-29

“Michelin Pilot Sport 4 tires are noisy (a followup) I have been asked on this sub if the PS4 tires on my wife’s Bolt are noisy, and I wasn’t sure how to answer. Well, we made two 60-mile round trips this past weekend, mostly on highways with 55 and 70 mph speed limits, and I have to say that the tires are kind of noisy. Certainly not as quiet as EV-oriented tires are. The grip is fantastic, so we really like them. If you are sensitive to noise, though, these Max Performance class tires are probably not for you.”

f30.bimmerpost.com

“Quote: Originally Posted by weston.__ I will be going down the non-rft route, Pilot Sport 4. You're not the only one to say the ride quality with non-rft is a massive improvement and this is the reason why I will change once the time comes. I went from Bridgestone S001 RFT to 'go-flats' and have found the suppleness an obvious difference. Since I put the pressure to the mid point between the low and high load plated pressures I have yet to have any of the heartstopping thumps come through the suspension that the Bridgestone seemed prone to.”

Top themes
#Wet and dry grip#Run-flat replacement upgrade#Treadwear and longevity#Cold weather performance#Road noise and comfort#EV range and efficiency#Comparison to Continental tires

Based on 246 community posts

Tire B

Continental ContiSportContact 5P

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 B · Continental ContiSportContact 5P
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available6241
Rim diameters16″ – 20″18″ – 22″
Tread depth—8 - 10/32″
UTQG300 - 320 A - AA A240 - 280 AA A
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common1515

Which one should you actually buy?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4

Continental ContiSportContact 5P

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 71 vs 43 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 81 vs 55 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 76 vs 54 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 4 scores 89 vs 69 on wet.

Tire A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4
Tire B · Continental ContiSportContact 5P

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Pilot Sport 4 or ContiSportContact 5P?

Which is better in the wet, Pilot Sport 4 or ContiSportContact 5P?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 89 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Pilot Sport 4 or ContiSportContact 5P?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 87 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, Pilot Sport 4 or ContiSportContact 5P?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 70 vs 59 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, Pilot Sport 4 or ContiSportContact 5P?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 76 vs 54 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Pilot Sport 4 or ContiSportContact 5P?

Michelin Pilot Sport 4, 71 vs 43 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology