Head-to-head Updated

Continental ContiSportContact 5P vs Michelin Pilot Super Sport — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 123 + 1,506 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Super Sport is ahead, 78–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental ContiSportContact 5P
± 6

Tests 78 · 1 test Owners 48 · 123 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test (wet braking)

Michelin Pilot Super Sport
± 6

Tests 75 · 1 test Owners 82 · 1,506 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 9 in 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Damn. 295s on Style 359Ms? That's pushing it a bit, isn't it? I so desperately wish Michelin would make a 285/30 PSS. I'm running 275/35s now, and while I like the extra rubber on the road, I don't like the increased sidewall height over the OEM 265/35.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 71

    Dry

    Pilot Super Sport +12
    83
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5PPilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7877
    Reviews found online5990
    Dry Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%99%
    Dry Handling (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 0–0100%100%

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 78.3 + 40% × 59.2 = 71

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 77.4 + 40% × 90.2 = 83

  2. 69

    Wet

    Pilot Super Sport +8
    77
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5PPilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 1 tests7773
    Reviews found online5884
    Wet Braking (% of best) · 1 shared test · wins 1–0100%95%

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 76.9 + 40% × 58.1 = 69

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 73.1 + 40% × 84 = 77

  3. 53

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5PPilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)–
    Reviews found online43–

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 42.7 = 53

    No road tests of snow for ContiSportContact 5P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 55

    Comfort

    Pilot Super Sport +19
    74
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5PPilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online4977

    ContiSportContact 5P: 40% × 65.4 (est.) + 60% × 48.6 = 55

    Pilot Super Sport: 40% × 70.6 (est.) + 60% × 76.9 = 74

    No road tests of comfort for ContiSportContact 5P or Pilot Super Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 59

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5PPilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online49–

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 48.5 = 59

    No road tests of noise for ContiSportContact 5P. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 43

    Treadwear

    Pilot Super Sport +27
    70
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5PPilot Super Sport
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 53 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online2873

    ContiSportContact 5P: 60% × 52.8 (est.) + 40% × 27.9 = 43

    Pilot Super Sport: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 72.8 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for ContiSportContact 5P. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Pilot Super Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 56

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Super Sport +27
    83
    Why this score
    SourceContiSportContact 5PPilot Super Sport
    Reviews found online5683
Scores at a glance
Continental ContiSportContact 5P vs Michelin Pilot Super Sport: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ContiSportContact 5PMichelin Pilot Super Sport
Relative Score 62 78
Dry 71 83
Wet 69 77
Snow 53 –
Comfort 55 74
Noise 59 –
Treadwear 43 70
Handling (owners) 56 83

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 6

ContiSportContact 5P

± 6

Pilot Super Sport

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

In the overall rankings of 5 tests that ran both, Continental ContiSportContact 5P finished ahead 3 times and Michelin Pilot Super Sport 2 times.

DisciplineCategoryContiSportContact 5PPilot Super SportΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 100% 99% +1.4 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test · 235/35 R19
Dry Handling Dry 100% 100% 0.0 0–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test · 235/35 R19
Wet Braking Wet 100% 95% +5.0 1–0 in 1 shared test Newest: 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test · 235/35 R19
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #1/9 #2/9 – 3–2 in 5 shared tests Newest: 2017 Motor Mag UHP Tyre Test · 235/35 R19

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ContiSportContact 5P

Pros

  • Outstanding dry and wet traction providing confidence-inspiring grip
  • High level of steering feedback and precise high-speed cornering ability
  • Excellent ride comfort and bump absorption for an ultra-high-performance tire

Cons

  • Rapid and excessively fast tread wear, with many users replacing them under 10,000 miles
  • Prone to straight-line wheel spin and wheel hop during hard acceleration
  • Noticeable road noise as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the ContiSportContact 5P review

Tire B Pilot Super Sport

Pros

  • Phenomenal dry grip and cornering stability
  • Precise steering response and excellent road feedback
  • Better-than-expected tread wear and mileage for a performance tire

Cons

  • Reduced grip and traction in cold weather (below 15°C)
  • Mediocre performance and tendency to aquaplane when tread wears down in heavy rain
  • High price point compared to some alternatives
All owner themes in the Pilot Super Sport review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ContiSportContact 5P

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Super Sport

Positive

The Michelin Pilot Super Sport is widely praised by the community as a benchmark high-performance street tire offering outstanding dry grip, sharp cornering capability, and decent ride comfort for daily driving. Many drivers note that its successor, the Pilot Sport 4S, improves upon it—especially in cold and wet conditions—while several users highlight downsides such as poor winter/snow capability, premium pricing, and eventual rubber degradation or tread cracking as the tires age.

Top themes
#Dry grip and cornering#Comparison to PS4S#Poor snow performance#Tread life and wear#High purchase price#Age and cracking issues#Daily driving comfort

Based on 364 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ContiSportContact 5P B · Michelin Pilot Super Sport
CategorySummerSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4150
Rim diameters18″ – 22″17″ – 23″
Tread depth8 - 10/32″—
UTQG240 - 280 AA A—
SidewallBlack Side Wall—
Max pressure50 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common1818

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ContiSportContact 5P

Michelin Pilot Super Sport

Winner: Michelin Pilot Super Sport — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Super Sport scores 70 vs 43 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Super Sport scores 83 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Michelin Pilot Super Sport scores 74 vs 55 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Super Sport scores 83 vs 71 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ContiSportContact 5P
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Super Sport

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ContiSportContact 5P or Pilot Super Sport?

Which is better in the wet, ContiSportContact 5P or Pilot Super Sport?

Michelin Pilot Super Sport, 77 vs 69 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ContiSportContact 5P or Pilot Super Sport?

Michelin Pilot Super Sport, 83 vs 71 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ContiSportContact 5P or Pilot Super Sport?

Michelin Pilot Super Sport, 74 vs 55 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ContiSportContact 5P or Pilot Super Sport?

Michelin Pilot Super Sport, 70 vs 43 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology