Tests – · none yet Owners 43 · 9 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental ContiVanContact 200 vs Laufenn S Fit EQ+ — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 11 road tests and 9 + 11 owner reviews. How we score
S Fit EQ+ is ahead, 74–53
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
S Fit EQ+ +2782Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 80 Reviews found online 49 85 ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 59.9 (est.) + 40% × 48.6 = 55
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 79.7 + 40% × 84.8 = 82
No road tests of dry for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
57
Wet
S Fit EQ+ +1875Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 51 78 ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 60.1 (est.) + 40% × 51.3 = 57
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 73.5 + 40% × 78.3 = 75
No road tests of wet for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
54
Comfort
S Fit EQ+ +1973Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 2 tests ≈ 64 (est.) 66 Reviews found online 47 77 ContiVanContact 200: 40% × 64.3 (est.) + 60% × 46.7 = 54
S Fit EQ+: 40% × 66.4 + 60% × 77.3 = 73
No road tests of comfort for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison73Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests – 77 Reviews found online – ≈ 66 (est.) S Fit EQ+: 60% × 76.8 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 73
No owner ratings of noise for S Fit EQ+. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
41
Treadwear
S Fit EQ+ +1556Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests ≈ 52 (est.) 43 Reviews found online 25 76 ContiVanContact 200: 60% × 51.6 (est.) + 40% × 24.7 = 41
S Fit EQ+: 60% × 43.2 + 40% × 76.2 = 56
No road tests of treadwear for ContiVanContact 200. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
53
Handling (owners)
S Fit EQ+ +3083Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 S Fit EQ+ Reviews found online 53 83 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison73Why this score
Source ContiVanContact 200 S Fit EQ+ Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests – 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ContiVanContact 200 | Laufenn S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 53 | 74 |
| Dry | 55 | 82 |
| Wet | 57 | 75 |
| Comfort | 54 | 73 |
| Noise | – | 73 |
| Treadwear | 41 | 56 |
| Handling (owners) | 53 | 83 |
| Efficiency | – | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Recomputed
Headline score
53
/ 100
ContiVanContact 200
74
/ 100
S Fit EQ+
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ContiVanContact 200 | S Fit EQ+ | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #1/6 2019 Promobil Commercial Summer Tire Test | #9/10 2026 Auto Zeitung 18 Inch Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ContiVanContact 200
Pros
- Strong initial grip and handling performance in both wet and dry conditions
- Comfortable ride quality
- Acceptable fuel efficiency
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear
- Significant loss of wet-weather traction as the tread depth decreases
- Pronounced uneven wear patterns, specifically scalloping and outer-edge degradation
Tire B S Fit EQ+
Pros
- Good to excellent dry grip, traction and handling, with several reviewers noting stable, confident behavior
- Wet grip described as decent to excellent, with plenty of grip in both conditions
- Excellent value; frequently compared favorably with Continental, Goodyear, Michelin and Hankook tires at a much lower price
Cons
- Road noise noted as louder than expected by some reviewers, with one reporting a marked increase after 2,500 km
- Ride can feel stiff or harder than needed, and one reviewer found the tires became hard and uncomfortable below 10°C
- Longevity is uncertain; reviewers estimate roughly 18,000-20,000 miles from one set, and others are unsure how long they will last
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ContiVanContact 200 | B · Laufenn S Fit EQ+ |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Van | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 16 | 74 |
| Rim diameters | 15″ – 17″ | 15″ – 20″ |
| UTQG | — | 360 A A |
| Sizes in common | 4 | 4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
53
/ 100
Continental ContiVanContact 200
74
/ 100
Laufenn S Fit EQ+
Winner: Laufenn S Fit EQ+ — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ContiVanContact 200 rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 9 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Pick tire B
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 83 vs 53 on handling.
Pick tire B
You want the most grip on dry roads
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 82 vs 55 on dry.
Pick tire B
You want the most comfortable ride
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 73 vs 54 on comfort.
Pick tire B
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Laufenn S Fit EQ+ scores 75 vs 57 on wet.
Tire A · Continental ContiVanContact 200
Tire B · Laufenn S Fit EQ+
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ContiVanContact 200 or S Fit EQ+?
Which is better in the wet, ContiVanContact 200 or S Fit EQ+?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 75 vs 57 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ContiVanContact 200 or S Fit EQ+?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 82 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, ContiVanContact 200 or S Fit EQ+?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 73 vs 54 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ContiVanContact 200 or S Fit EQ+?
Laufenn S Fit EQ+, 56 vs 41 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology