Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 12 reviews
Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ vs Continental CrossContact LX25 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 12 + 26 owner reviews. How we score
CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 73–54
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 79 · 26 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
CrossContact LX25 +2176Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ CrossContact LX25 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 60 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 48 84 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 55
CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 83.5 = 76
No road tests of dry for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
58
Wet
CrossContact LX25 +2280Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ CrossContact LX25 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 78 (est.) Reviews found online 53 84 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 58
CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.9 (est.) + 40% × 83.6 = 80
No road tests of wet for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
57
Snow
ControlContact Sport SRS+ +453Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ CrossContact LX25 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 63 (est.) 40 Reviews found online 50 72 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 49.5 = 57
CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.3 + 40% × 72.2 = 53
No road tests of snow for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
47
Comfort
CrossContact LX25 +3077Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ CrossContact LX25 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 36 80 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 40% × 63 (est.) + 60% × 35.7 = 47
CrossContact LX25: 40% × 71.2 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77
No road tests of comfort for ControlContact Sport SRS+ or CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison71Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ CrossContact LX25 Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 78 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 71
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
CrossContact LX25 +1872Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ CrossContact LX25 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 45 76 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 45.4 = 54
CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
43
Handling (owners)
CrossContact LX25 +3679Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ CrossContact LX25 Reviews found online 43 79
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ | Continental CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 54 | 73 |
| Dry | 55 | 76 |
| Wet | 58 | 80 |
| Snow | 57 | 53 |
| Comfort | 47 | 77 |
| Noise | – | 71 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 43 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ControlContact Sport SRS+
CrossContact LX25
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ControlContact Sport SRS+
Pros
- Strong dry and wet pavement traction
- Solid cornering stability and steering response
- Good value proposition for budget-conscious drivers
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin drone
- Noticeable vibration and harshness over uneven surfaces
- Inconsistent tread life reported by some users
Tire B CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ | B · Continental CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | — | 40 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10 - 12/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 740 A A - B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | — | 44 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+
Continental CrossContact LX25
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ if snow matters most to you. Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 43 on handling.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 77 vs 47 on comfort.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 58 on wet.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 55 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ControlContact Sport SRS+ or CrossContact LX25?
Which is better in the wet, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or CrossContact LX25?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or CrossContact LX25?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or CrossContact LX25?
Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+, 57 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or CrossContact LX25?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 77 vs 47 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or CrossContact LX25?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology