Head-to-head Updated

Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ vs Cooper Evolution Tour — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 674 owner reviews. How we score

Evolution Tour is ahead, 68–55

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cooper Evolution Tour
Tire BCooper

Evolution Tour

All-Season tire

± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 674 reviews

“I have Cooper Evolution Tours on my Equinox. No major complaints, but would probably move up to the Discoverer line in the future. The Evolution Tours ride nice and are very quiet, but there is no way they will go 65,000 miles as indicated by Cooper. I have just about 17,000 miles on them, and they are already down to 6/32 on all four despite rotating them every 5,000-7,000 miles. Next time I get tires I want to try one of the new "severe weather rated" tires. Considering either the Cooper Discoverer Enduramax or Falken Wildpeak A/T Trail.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 55

    Dry

    Evolution Tour +14
    69
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Evolution Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online4869

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 55

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69

    No road tests of dry for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

    No road tests of dry for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 58

    Wet

    Evolution Tour +14
    72
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Evolution Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 61 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online5372

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 58

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72

    No road tests of wet for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 58

    Snow

    Level
    58
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Evolution Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 64 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4949

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 58

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 58

    No road tests of snow for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

    No road tests of snow for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 46

    Comfort

    Evolution Tour +22
    68
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Evolution Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online3567

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 40% × 61.9 (est.) + 60% × 34.9 = 46

    Evolution Tour: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68

    No road tests of comfort for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    68
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Evolution Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online–70

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68

    No road tests of noise for Evolution Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Evolution Tour +16
    70
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Evolution Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 59 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online4672

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.6 = 54

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 70

    No road tests of treadwear for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 43

    Handling (owners)

    Evolution Tour +25
    68
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Evolution Tour
    Reviews found online4368
Scores at a glance
Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ vs Cooper Evolution Tour: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental ControlContact Sport SRS+Cooper Evolution Tour
Relative Score 55 68
Dry 55 69
Wet 58 72
Snow 58 58
Comfort 46 68
Noise – 68
Treadwear 54 70
Handling (owners) 43 68

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ControlContact Sport SRS+

± 7

Evolution Tour

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ControlContact Sport SRS+

Pros

  • Strong dry and wet pavement traction
  • Solid cornering stability and steering response
  • Good value proposition for budget-conscious drivers

Cons

  • Excessive road noise and cabin drone
  • Noticeable vibration and harshness over uneven surfaces
  • Inconsistent tread life reported by some users
All owner themes in the ControlContact Sport SRS+ review

Tire B Evolution Tour

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet-weather traction and water displacement

Cons

  • Tread life often fails to meet mileage warranty expectations
  • Inconsistent noise levels reported by some users
  • Potential for premature wear compared to premium competitors like Michelin
All owner themes in the Evolution Tour review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Cooper Evolution Tour

Mixed

Community members report that the Cooper Evolution Tour offers a smooth, quiet ride and decent performance that often surpasses certain OEM tires. However, multiple users express disappointment regarding treadwear, noting that the tires wear down significantly faster than their advertised 65,000-mile warranty suggests.

Top themes
#quiet and smooth ride#faster than expected treadwear#good value alternative#favorable OEM comparison

Based on 6 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ B · Cooper Evolution Tour
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG560 A - AA A580 - 600 A A - B
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+

Cooper Evolution Tour

Winner: Cooper Evolution Tour — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 68 vs 43 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most comfortable ride

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 68 vs 46 on comfort.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 70 vs 54 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 69 vs 55 on dry.

Tire A · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+
Tire B · Cooper Evolution Tour

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Evolution Tour?

Which is better in the wet, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Evolution Tour?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 72 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Evolution Tour?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 69 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Evolution Tour?

Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 58 on the snow score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Evolution Tour?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 68 vs 46 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Evolution Tour?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 70 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology