Tests – · none yet Owners 47 · 12 reviews
Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ vs Cooper Evolution Tour — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 12 + 674 owner reviews. How we score
Evolution Tour is ahead, 68–55
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 68 · 674 reviews
“I have Cooper Evolution Tours on my Equinox. No major complaints, but would probably move up to the Discoverer line in the future. The Evolution Tours ride nice and are very quiet, but there is no way they will go 65,000 miles as indicated by Cooper. I have just about 17,000 miles on them, and they are already down to 6/32 on all four despite rotating them every 5,000-7,000 miles. Next time I get tires I want to try one of the new "severe weather rated" tires. Considering either the Cooper Discoverer Enduramax or Falken Wildpeak A/T Trail.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
55
Dry
Evolution Tour +1469Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 48 69 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 59.6 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 55
Evolution Tour: 60% × 68.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 69
No road tests of dry for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
58
Wet
Evolution Tour +1472Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 61 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 53 72 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 58
Evolution Tour: 60% × 71.5 (est.) + 40% × 72.2 = 72
No road tests of wet for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
58
Snow
Level58Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 64 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 49 49 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 63.7 (est.) + 40% × 49.1 = 58
Evolution Tour: 60% × 63.8 (est.) + 40% × 49.3 = 58
No road tests of snow for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
46
Comfort
Evolution Tour +2268Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 62 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 35 67 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 40% × 61.9 (est.) + 60% × 34.9 = 46
Evolution Tour: 40% × 68.4 (est.) + 60% × 67.2 = 68
No road tests of comfort for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
–
Noise
No comparison68Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online – 70 Evolution Tour: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68
No road tests of noise for Evolution Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
54
Treadwear
Evolution Tour +1670Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 46 72 ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 59 (est.) + 40% × 45.6 = 54
Evolution Tour: 60% × 68.5 (est.) + 40% × 72 = 70
No road tests of treadwear for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
43
Handling (owners)
Evolution Tour +2568Why this score
Source ControlContact Sport SRS+ Evolution Tour Reviews found online 43 68
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ | Cooper Evolution Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 55 | 68 |
| Dry | 55 | 69 |
| Wet | 58 | 72 |
| Snow | 58 | 58 |
| Comfort | 46 | 68 |
| Noise | – | 68 |
| Treadwear | 54 | 70 |
| Handling (owners) | 43 | 68 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ControlContact Sport SRS+
Evolution Tour
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ControlContact Sport SRS+
Pros
- Strong dry and wet pavement traction
- Solid cornering stability and steering response
- Good value proposition for budget-conscious drivers
Cons
- Excessive road noise and cabin drone
- Noticeable vibration and harshness over uneven surfaces
- Inconsistent tread life reported by some users
Tire B Evolution Tour
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet-weather traction and water displacement
Cons
- Tread life often fails to meet mileage warranty expectations
- Inconsistent noise levels reported by some users
- Potential for premature wear compared to premium competitors like Michelin
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Cooper Evolution Tour
Community members report that the Cooper Evolution Tour offers a smooth, quiet ride and decent performance that often surpasses certain OEM tires. However, multiple users express disappointment regarding treadwear, noting that the tires wear down significantly faster than their advertised 65,000-mile warranty suggests.
“No one recommending Cooper tires? Hey everyone!! My very first car is a 2019 honda fit EX and I'm new to pretty much everything in regards to it. I've had it since May of last year. I don't see any recommendations for Cooper tires. Is there a reason for this? I'm looking into the Cooper Evolution Tour All Season. My dad (who used to be a mechanic) suggests them, and they're available at the closest Walmart. I'm also looking into Yokohama, but they'll have to be shipped and they're 20$ more per tire. I'll most likely replace all four. I'm at 32k miles, but my rear passenger tire blew out the other day. The car still has the stock tires. Read more”
“It appears the Endeavor might be one step above the Evolution based on the Cooper website and their performance chart that compares tires to other Cooper tires. I like the performance characteristics of my Cooper Evolution Tour tires, I just wish the tread wear was a little better, especially for a 65,000 mile rated tire. I am down to 5/32 tread depth on all four tires after only 20,000 miles.”
Based on 6 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ | B · Cooper Evolution Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 560 A - AA A | 580 - 600 A A - B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+
Cooper Evolution Tour
Winner: Cooper Evolution Tour — better handling, comfort and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Cooper Evolution Tour scores 68 vs 43 on handling.
Cooper Evolution Tour scores 68 vs 46 on comfort.
Cooper Evolution Tour scores 70 vs 54 on treadwear.
Cooper Evolution Tour scores 69 vs 55 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Evolution Tour?
Which is better in the wet, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Evolution Tour?
Cooper Evolution Tour, 72 vs 58 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Evolution Tour?
Cooper Evolution Tour, 69 vs 55 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Evolution Tour?
Neither, by our numbers: 58 vs 58 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is more comfortable, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Evolution Tour?
Cooper Evolution Tour, 68 vs 46 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Evolution Tour?
Cooper Evolution Tour, 70 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology