tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ vs Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 23 road tests and 12 + 6,449 owner reviews. How we score

Pilot Sport 5 is ahead, 90–54

Check price on Amazon · Pilot Sport 5 or ControlContact Sport SRS+ on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Tire BMichelin

Pilot Sport 5

Summer

± 4

Tests 86 · 23 tests Owners 88 · 6,449 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2026 Autobild Summer Tyre Test (subj. dry handling)

“Put some 235/45 R17 ps5’s on my 9-5 They fill up the arches quite nice!”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 55

    Dry

    Pilot Sport 5 +37
    92
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests≈ 60 (est.)93
    Reviews found online4891

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 59.8 (est.) + 40% × 48.3 = 55

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 92.9 + 40% × 90.8 = 92

    No road tests of dry for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 58

    Wet

    Pilot Sport 5 +36
    94
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests≈ 61 (est.)94
    Reviews found online5394

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 61.2 (est.) + 40% × 53.4 = 58

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 94.1 + 40% × 93.6 = 94

    No road tests of wet for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 57

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online50–

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 62.8 (est.) + 40% × 49.5 = 57

    No road tests of snow for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 47

    Comfort

    Pilot Sport 5 +32
    79
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 63 (est.)71
    Reviews found online3685

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 40% × 63 (est.) + 60% × 35.7 = 47

    Pilot Sport 5: 40% × 71 + 60% × 84.8 = 79

    No road tests of comfort for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    47
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 15 tests–33
    Reviews found online–≈ 67 (est.)

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 33.2 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 47

    No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 5. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 54

    Treadwear

    Pilot Sport 5 +33
    87
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 6 tests≈ 59 (est.)92
    Reviews found online4579

    ControlContact Sport SRS+: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 45.4 = 54

    Pilot Sport 5: 60% × 91.9 + 40% × 78.9 = 87

    No road tests of treadwear for ControlContact Sport SRS+. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 43

    Handling (owners)

    Pilot Sport 5 +46
    89
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Pilot Sport 5
    Reviews found online4389
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceControlContact Sport SRS+Pilot Sport 5
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 17 tests–64
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental ControlContact Sport SRS+Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Relative Score 54 90
Dry 55 92
Wet 58 94
Snow 57 –
Comfort 47 79
Noise – 47
Treadwear 54 87
Handling (owners) 43 89
Efficiency – 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 8

ControlContact Sport SRS+

± 4

Pilot Sport 5

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ControlContact Sport SRS+

Pros

  • Strong dry and wet pavement traction
  • Solid cornering stability and steering response
  • Good value proposition for budget-conscious drivers

Cons

  • Excessive road noise and cabin drone
  • Noticeable vibration and harshness over uneven surfaces
  • Inconsistent tread life reported by some users
All owner themes in the ControlContact Sport SRS+ review

Tire B Pilot Sport 5

Pros

  • Outstanding wet and dry traction with high resistance to aquaplaning
  • Superior tread life and longevity compared to competitors and previous generations
  • Noticeable improvements in ride comfort and a quieter cabin over rough road surfaces

Cons

  • Softer sidewalls can lead to initial steering vagueness or understeer during hard cornering
  • Higher price point compared to some tier-one competitors
  • Performance and grip degrade significantly under intense track heat or heavy circuit use
All owner themes in the Pilot Sport 5 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Positive

Community opinion on the Michelin Pilot Sport 5 is overwhelmingly positive for daily street driving, praising its exceptional wet grip, tread longevity, and quiet comfort compared to run-flats and older performance tires. However, several enthusiasts note downsides for aggressive or track use, specifically citing softer sidewalls, muted steering feedback, and poor heat resistance leading to delamination under track conditions. Most drivers consider it an outstanding premium all-rounder for sporty street cars rather than a dedicated track or extreme-performance tire.

r/DubaiPetrolHeads ·3 upvotes ·2025-07-15

“Had both on my ST. The 4S is more performance oriented but it wore out much quicker in approximately 35k kms. PS5 is more comfortable and the wear is slower however it does get noisy towards its end of life. After the 2 sets of Michelins, I tried the Falken FK520 for half the cost of the Michelins but found it to more comfortable for daily driving as it is comparatively softer.”
cliosport.net ·5 upvotes ·2024-02-07

“I’ve done 20k on a set of fronts that still have ~2-2.5mm left. They’re wearing very well IMO.”
f30.bimmerpost.com

“I've used the PS4S, potenza s001's & sports contact 7. Currently on Pilot Sport 5's and I think they're the best all road "do it all"road tyre I've had on my RWD . The asymmetric 6 is also supposed to be great but I havent tried that.”
Top themes
#wet grip performance#tread wear longevity#daily driving comfort#track heat delamination#soft sidewall steering feedback#road noise levels#comparison with ps4s

Based on 174 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / CrossoverPassenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available—66
Rim diameters—16″ – 22″

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+

Michelin Pilot Sport 5

Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 5 — better handling, dry and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+ rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 12 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 89 vs 43 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 92 vs 55 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 94 vs 58 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin Pilot Sport 5 scores 87 vs 54 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental ControlContact Sport SRS+
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Michelin Pilot Sport 5
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Pilot Sport 5?

Which is better in the wet, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 94 vs 58 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 92 vs 55 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 79 vs 47 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ControlContact Sport SRS+ or Pilot Sport 5?

Michelin Pilot Sport 5, 87 vs 54 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology