Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 14 reviews
Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Continental PureContact LS — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 25 owner reviews. How we score
PureContact LS is ahead, 70–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 70 · 25 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
PureContact LS +771Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T PureContact LS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 62 73 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
PureContact LS: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 72.5 = 71
No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
64
Wet
PureContact LS +973Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T PureContact LS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 63 74 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
PureContact LS: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.2 = 73
No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
53
Snow
PureContact LS +1467Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T PureContact LS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 41 64 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53
PureContact LS: 60% × 68.1 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 67
No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
Level65Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T PureContact LS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 60 61 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
PureContact LS: 60% × 67.8 (est.) + 40% × 61.4 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T or PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison70Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T PureContact LS Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 73 PureContact LS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 70
No road tests of noise for PureContact LS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
PureContact LS +368Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T PureContact LS Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 64 69 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
PureContact LS: 60% × 66.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for PureContact LS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
62
Handling (owners)
PureContact LS +1173Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T PureContact LS Reviews found online 62 73
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Cross Contact A/T | Continental PureContact LS |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 70 |
| Dry | 64 | 71 |
| Wet | 64 | 73 |
| Snow | 53 | 67 |
| Comfort | 65 | 65 |
| Noise | – | 70 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 73 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Cross Contact A/T
PureContact LS
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Cross Contact A/T
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
- High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
- Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces
Cons
- Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
- Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
- Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
Tire B PureContact LS
Pros
- Exceptionally quiet and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet and dry traction with reliable handling
- Good balance of everyday comfort and long treadlife
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can lead to less responsive or wandering handling during aggressive cornering
- Develops temporary flat spotting when parked, causing morning vibrations
- Poor winter performance, particularly lacking traction on snow and ice despite being an all-season tire
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Cross Contact A/T | B · Continental PureContact LS |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 700 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 70,000 mi |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Cross Contact A/T
Continental PureContact LS
Winner: Continental PureContact LS — better snow, handling and wet. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental PureContact LS scores 67 vs 53 on snow.
Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 62 on handling.
Continental PureContact LS scores 73 vs 64 on wet.
Continental PureContact LS scores 71 vs 64 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Cross Contact A/T or PureContact LS?
Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or PureContact LS?
Continental PureContact LS, 73 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or PureContact LS?
Continental PureContact LS, 71 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Cross Contact A/T or PureContact LS?
Continental PureContact LS, 67 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or PureContact LS?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or PureContact LS?
Continental PureContact LS, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology