Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 14 reviews
Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Cooper Evolution Tour — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 674 owner reviews. How we score
Evolution Tour is ahead, 68–62
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 674 reviews
“It appears the Endeavor might be one step above the Evolution based on the Cooper website and their performance chart that compares tires to other Cooper tires. I like the performance characteristics of my Cooper Evolution Tour tires, I just wish the tread wear was a little better, especially for a 65,000 mile rated tire. I am down to 5/32 tread depth on all four tires after only 20,000 miles.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Evolution Tour +468Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 62 69 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Evolution Tour: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
64
Wet
Evolution Tour +771Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 63 71 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
Evolution Tour: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71
No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
53
Snow
Evolution Tour +659Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 41 52 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53
Evolution Tour: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 59
No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
Evolution Tour +469Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 60 69 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
Evolution Tour: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69
No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T or Evolution Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison69Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) – ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online – 71 Evolution Tour: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 69
No road tests of noise for Evolution Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Evolution Tour +368Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Evolution Tour Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 64 70 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
Evolution Tour: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Evolution Tour +769Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Evolution Tour Reviews found online 62 69
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Cross Contact A/T | Cooper Evolution Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 68 |
| Dry | 64 | 68 |
| Wet | 64 | 71 |
| Snow | 53 | 59 |
| Comfort | 65 | 69 |
| Noise | – | 69 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 68 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 69 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Cross Contact A/T
Evolution Tour
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Cross Contact A/T
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
- High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
- Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces
Cons
- Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
- Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
- Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
Tire B Evolution Tour
Pros
- Excellent value for the price point
- Smooth and comfortable ride quality
- Strong wet-weather traction and water displacement
Cons
- Tread life often fails to meet mileage warranty expectations
- Inconsistent noise levels reported by some users
- Potential for premature wear compared to premium competitors like Michelin
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Continental Cross Contact A/T
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Cooper Evolution Tour
Community members praise the Cooper Evolution Tour for its quiet, comfortable ride and solid baseline performance compared to OEM alternatives. However, users consistently express disappointment regarding rapid tread wear, noting the tire wears down much faster than its 65,000-mile rating suggests.
“It appears the Endeavor might be one step above the Evolution based on the Cooper website and their performance chart that compares tires to other Cooper tires. I like the performance characteristics of my Cooper Evolution Tour tires, I just wish the tread wear was a little better, especially for a 65,000 mile rated tire. I am down to 5/32 tread depth on all four tires after only 20,000 miles.”
“I have Cooper Evolution Tours on my Equinox. No major complaints, but would probably move up to the Discoverer line in the future. The Evolution Tours ride nice and are very quiet, but there is no way they will go 65,000 miles as indicated by Cooper. I have just about 17,000 miles on them, and they are already down to 6/32 on all four despite rotating them every 5,000-7,000 miles. Next time I get tires I want to try one of the new "severe weather rated" tires. Considering either the Cooper Discoverer Enduramax or Falken Wildpeak A/T Trail.”
Based on 6 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Cross Contact A/T | B · Cooper Evolution Tour |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Season tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Tread depth | — | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | — | 580 - 600 A A - B |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 44 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Cross Contact A/T
Cooper Evolution Tour
Winner: Cooper Evolution Tour — better wet, handling and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Cooper Evolution Tour scores 71 vs 64 on wet.
Cooper Evolution Tour scores 69 vs 62 on handling.
Cooper Evolution Tour scores 59 vs 53 on snow.
Cooper Evolution Tour scores 68 vs 64 on dry.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Cross Contact A/T or Evolution Tour?
Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or Evolution Tour?
Cooper Evolution Tour, 71 vs 64 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or Evolution Tour?
Cooper Evolution Tour, 68 vs 64 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, Cross Contact A/T or Evolution Tour?
Cooper Evolution Tour, 59 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or Evolution Tour?
Cooper Evolution Tour, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or Evolution Tour?
Cooper Evolution Tour, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology