Head-to-head Updated

Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Cooper Evolution Tour — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 674 owner reviews. How we score

Evolution Tour is ahead, 68–62

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cooper Evolution Tour
Tire BCooper

Evolution Tour

All-Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 674 reviews

“It appears the Endeavor might be one step above the Evolution based on the Cooper website and their performance chart that compares tires to other Cooper tires. I like the performance characteristics of my Cooper Evolution Tour tires, I just wish the tread wear was a little better, especially for a 65,000 mile rated tire. I am down to 5/32 tread depth on all four tires after only 20,000 miles.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    Evolution Tour +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TEvolution Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online6269

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 68.2 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68

    No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Evolution Tour +7
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TEvolution Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online6371

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 70.4 (est.) + 40% × 70.8 = 71

    No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Evolution Tour +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TEvolution Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4152

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 63.9 (est.) + 40% × 51.8 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Evolution Tour +4
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TEvolution Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online6069

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 68.7 = 69

    No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T or Evolution Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TEvolution Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–71

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 70.7 = 69

    No road tests of noise for Evolution Tour. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Evolution Tour +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TEvolution Tour
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6470

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    Evolution Tour: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 70.1 = 68

    No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Evolution Tour. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Evolution Tour +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TEvolution Tour
    Reviews found online6269
Scores at a glance
Continental Cross Contact A/T vs Cooper Evolution Tour: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental Cross Contact A/TCooper Evolution Tour
Relative Score 62 68
Dry 64 68
Wet 64 71
Snow 53 59
Comfort 65 69
Noise – 69
Treadwear 65 68
Handling (owners) 62 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Cross Contact A/T

Evolution Tour

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Cross Contact A/T

Pros

  • Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
  • High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
  • Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces

Cons

  • Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
  • Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
  • Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
All owner themes in the Cross Contact A/T review

Tire B Evolution Tour

Pros

  • Excellent value for the price point
  • Smooth and comfortable ride quality
  • Strong wet-weather traction and water displacement

Cons

  • Tread life often fails to meet mileage warranty expectations
  • Inconsistent noise levels reported by some users
  • Potential for premature wear compared to premium competitors like Michelin
All owner themes in the Evolution Tour review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental Cross Contact A/T

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Cooper Evolution Tour

Mixed

Community members praise the Cooper Evolution Tour for its quiet, comfortable ride and solid baseline performance compared to OEM alternatives. However, users consistently express disappointment regarding rapid tread wear, noting the tire wears down much faster than its 65,000-mile rating suggests.

Top themes
#quiet and comfortable ride#premature tread wear#tread life warranty concerns#comparison to OEM tires#pricing and availability

Based on 6 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Cross Contact A/T B · Cooper Evolution Tour
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Tread depth—10/32″
UTQG—580 - 600 A A - B
Sidewall—Black Side Wall
Max pressure—44 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Cross Contact A/T

Cooper Evolution Tour

Winner: Cooper Evolution Tour — better wet, handling and snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 71 vs 64 on wet.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 69 vs 62 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 59 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Cooper Evolution Tour scores 68 vs 64 on dry.

Tire A · Continental Cross Contact A/T
Tire B · Cooper Evolution Tour

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cross Contact A/T or Evolution Tour?

Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or Evolution Tour?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 71 vs 64 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or Evolution Tour?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 68 vs 64 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Cross Contact A/T or Evolution Tour?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 59 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or Evolution Tour?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 69 vs 65 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or Evolution Tour?

Cooper Evolution Tour, 68 vs 65 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology