Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 14 reviews
Continental Cross Contact A/T vs General Grabber A/T — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 17 owner reviews. How we score
Grabber A/T leads, 65–62 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 63 · 17 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
64
Dry
Grabber A/T +165Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Grabber A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 62 63 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64
Grabber A/T: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 63 = 65
No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
No road tests of dry for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).
-
64
Wet
Grabber A/T +266Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Grabber A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 63 65 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64
Grabber A/T: 60% × 66.9 (est.) + 40% × 64.6 = 66
No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
No road tests of wet for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
53
Snow
Grabber A/T +962Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Grabber A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 60 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 41 57 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53
Grabber A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 62
No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
No road tests of snow for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).
-
65
Comfort
Level65Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Grabber A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 60 62 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65
Grabber A/T: 60% × 67.9 (est.) + 40% × 61.8 = 65
No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T or Grabber A/T. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
65
Treadwear
Level65Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Grabber A/T Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 65 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 64 64 Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65
Grabber A/T: 60% × 65.1 (est.) + 40% × 64 = 65
No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for Grabber A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
62
Handling (owners)
Grabber A/T +264Why this score
Source Cross Contact A/T Grabber A/T Reviews found online 62 64
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Cross Contact A/T | General Grabber A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 62 | 65 |
| Dry | 64 | 65 |
| Wet | 64 | 66 |
| Snow | 53 | 62 |
| Comfort | 65 | 65 |
| Treadwear | 65 | 65 |
| Handling (owners) | 62 | 64 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Cross Contact A/T
Grabber A/T
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Cross Contact A/T
Pros
- Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
- High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
- Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces
Cons
- Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
- Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
- Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
Tire B Grabber A/T
Pros
- Excellent off-road traction on mud, grass, gravel, and farm tracks
- Good performance in snow and winter conditions
- Reasonably quiet and smooth on-road manners compared to more aggressive alternatives
Cons
- Poor or slippery grip on wet tarmac, raising safety concerns for some users
- Balancing issues reported by multiple owners
- Weak sidewall durability or vulnerability to punctures on low-profile applications
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Cross Contact A/T | B · General Grabber A/T |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Terrain tire | All-Terrain tire |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Cross Contact A/T
General Grabber A/T
Narrow edge: General Grabber A/T — better snow. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional. General Grabber A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 17 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
General Grabber A/T scores 62 vs 53 on snow.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Cross Contact A/T or Grabber A/T?
Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 66 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 65 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber A/T?
General Grabber A/T, 62 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber A/T?
Neither, by our numbers: 65 vs 65 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology