tirewheelguide
Head-to-head Updated

Continental Cross Contact A/T vs General Grabber HTS — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 14 + 990 owner reviews. How we score

Cross Contact A/T leads, 62–60 Narrow edge

Check price on Amazon · Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

General Grabber HTS
Tire BGeneral

Grabber HTS

All-Season tire

Tests – · none yet Owners 55 · 990 reviews

“Yeah Michelin's are out of my price range. Went to sears today to see about getting either the Falkens are another set of Grabber HTS's installed and apparently their online pricing leaves out a ~$25 shipping/handling charge they assess to each tire so I left.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 64

    Dry

    Cross Contact A/T +4
    60
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online6255

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.5 (est.) + 40% × 62.2 = 64

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 62.7 (est.) + 40% × 55.3 = 60

    No road tests of dry for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

    No road tests of dry for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 64

    Wet

    Cross Contact A/T +2
    62
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online6360

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.7 (est.) + 40% × 62.5 = 64

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 59.7 = 62

    No road tests of wet for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

    No road tests of wet for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Grabber HTS +6
    59
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 60 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online4152

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 41.3 = 53

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 64.1 (est.) + 40% × 52.4 = 59

    No road tests of snow for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

    No road tests of snow for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 65

    Comfort

    Cross Contact A/T +4
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 68 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online6054

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 67.6 (est.) + 40% × 60.4 = 65

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 53.5 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. –

    Noise

    No comparison
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)–≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online–59

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.2 = 64

    No road tests of noise for Grabber HTS. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 65

    Treadwear

    Cross Contact A/T +9
    56
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TGrabber HTS
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 65 (est.)≈ 60 (est.)
    Reviews found online6449

    Cross Contact A/T: 60% × 65.2 (est.) + 40% × 64.4 = 65

    Grabber HTS: 60% × 60.4 (est.) + 40% × 48.8 = 56

    No road tests of treadwear for Cross Contact A/T. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

    No road tests of treadwear for Grabber HTS. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 62

    Handling (owners)

    Cross Contact A/T +6
    56
    Why this score
    SourceCross Contact A/TGrabber HTS
    Reviews found online6256
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental Cross Contact A/TGeneral Grabber HTS
Relative Score 62 60
Dry 64 60
Wet 64 62
Snow 53 59
Comfort 65 61
Noise – 64
Treadwear 65 56
Handling (owners) 62 56

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

Cross Contact A/T

Grabber HTS

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A Cross Contact A/T

Pros

  • Excellent on-road comfort and handling with acceptable noise levels
  • High potential longevity and mileage for many users, with sets lasting upwards of 50,000 to 80,000 km/miles
  • Competent dry and wet performance on paved surfaces

Cons

  • Susceptibility to punctures and fragile sidewalls reported by some drivers
  • Rapid, premature tread wear experienced by certain users
  • Poor traction and spinning issues in winter conditions such as snow and ice
All owner themes in the Cross Contact A/T review

Tire B Grabber HTS

Pros

  • Smooth and quiet ride quality that improves vehicle feel
  • Excellent value and affordable price point compared to competitors like Michelin
  • Strong traction and handling in both dry and wet conditions

Cons

  • Premature tread wear reported by several users failing to reach expected mileage
  • Balancing difficulties and occasional out-of-round vibrations
  • Decreased winter and wet traction performance as the tread wears down
All owner themes in the Grabber HTS review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental Cross Contact A/T

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

General Grabber HTS

Positive

Community opinion on the General Grabber HTS is largely favorable, with drivers frequently praising its quiet ride, comfortable highway cruising, wet traction, and affordable price point. The most prevalent complaints focus on faster-than-advertised treadwear and occasional squirm or handling instability in heavy-load applications. Several users also note that while it handles moderate conditions well, dedicated snow tires are preferable in severe winter weather.

f150forum.com

“I put new tires on my truck this week. Since i tow a camper i decided to go with the 10 ply "E" rated tires. Since i put them on i have set the air pressure in 5 degree increments from 40-60 however the truck handles like crap. It feels like all 4 tires are flat it sways around so much. When im on the interstate going 60mph or so if i switch lanes it feels like the truck is going to fish tail. Anyone experienced this? I have about 200 miles on the tires now. Could it be they are not worn in? Or are these tires just that sloppy feeling?”
r/HyundaiSantaFe ·8 upvotes ·2025-03-11

“New shoes - General Grabber HTS 60’s on 2009 Santa Fe 2nd owner in my family after my grandfather, 124k and going strong Read more”
explorerforum.com ·2012-12-29

“Yeah Michelin's are out of my price range. Went to sears today to see about getting either the Falkens are another set of Grabber HTS's installed and apparently their online pricing leaves out a ~$25 shipping/handling charge they assess to each tire so I left.”
Top themes
#treadwear and longevity#highway comfort and noise#wet and dry traction#budget and value#winter and snow capability#towing and load stability

Based on 50 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental Cross Contact A/T B · General Grabber HTS
CategoryAll-Terrain tireAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available—9
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth—11 - 13/32″
UTQG—640 A B
Sidewall—Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering
Max pressure—44 - 80 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental Cross Contact A/T

General Grabber HTS

Narrow edge: Continental Cross Contact A/T — better treadwear, handling and dry. Pick the General Grabber HTS if snow matters most to you. Continental Cross Contact A/T rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 65 vs 56 on treadwear.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 62 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

General Grabber HTS scores 59 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental Cross Contact A/T scores 64 vs 60 on dry.

Tire A · Continental Cross Contact A/T
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · General Grabber HTS
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS?

Which is better in the wet, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS?

Neither, by our numbers: 64 vs 62 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS?

Continental Cross Contact A/T, 64 vs 60 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS?

General Grabber HTS, 59 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is more comfortable, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS?

Continental Cross Contact A/T, 65 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, Cross Contact A/T or Grabber HTS?

Continental Cross Contact A/T, 65 vs 56 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology