Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX Sport vs Continental CrossContact UHP — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 561 + 43 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact UHP is ahead, 64–57

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental CrossContact LX Sport
± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 561 reviews

“CrossContact LX Sport Hey folks, I have a 2024 CRV with 4 CrossContact LX Sport tires from the dealership. I have less than 9500 miles om my vehicle/tires but it appears I have a slight hole on the sidewall. If I place my finger on it the air stops coming out. I ordered a set of CrossClimate2s from Costco knowing that AWD vehicles need to match all 4 generally speaking to prevent issues with the drive train, but after my father member looked at it he insisted that I just need to slap a replacement on the single tire given theyre so new. Tldr: is it worth to buy a new set of CrossClimate2s or should I just get a single CrossContact and have tire rack match the tread depth? Kinda don't wanna be out $1400 but also went with my gut on it given i dont wanna f up my drive train on my vehicle and the CrossContacts according to reviews have high failure rates even at low mileage. Please let me know.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    CrossContact UHP +10
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportCrossContact UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online5569

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 68.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 69

    No road tests of dry for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

    No road tests of dry for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 61

    Wet

    CrossContact UHP +9
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportCrossContact UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online5769

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 61

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 70 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 70

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    CrossContact LX Sport +6
    56
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportCrossContact UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 62 (est.)
    Reviews found online5747

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 62

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 62 (est.) + 40% × 47.4 = 56

    No road tests of snow for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

    No road tests of snow for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    CrossContact UHP +3
    65
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportCrossContact UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 68 (est.)
    Reviews found online5863

    CrossContact LX Sport: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 62

    CrossContact UHP: 40% × 68 (est.) + 60% × 63.2 = 65

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX Sport or CrossContact UHP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    CrossContact UHP +4
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportCrossContact UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online6170

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 64

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX Sport or CrossContact UHP. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 40

    Treadwear

    CrossContact UHP +13
    53
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportCrossContact UHP
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 51 (est.)≈ 59 (est.)
    Reviews found online2345

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 51 (est.) + 40% × 22.6 = 40

    CrossContact UHP: 60% × 58.7 (est.) + 40% × 44.9 = 53

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 46

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact UHP +18
    64
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportCrossContact UHP
    Reviews found online4664
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact LX Sport vs Continental CrossContact UHP: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX SportContinental CrossContact UHP
Relative Score 57 64
Dry 59 69
Wet 61 70
Snow 62 56
Comfort 62 65
Noise 64 68
Treadwear 40 53
Handling (owners) 46 64

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX Sport

± 7

CrossContact UHP

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX Sport

Pros

  • Low road noise and exceptional cabin comfort
  • Strong handling and reliable grip in wet and dry conditions
  • Confident performance in light snow and winter weather

Cons

  • Disappointing tread life and faster-than-expected wear
  • Occasional reports of reduced traction in heavy mud or specific slick conditions
  • Higher price point relative to the longevity experienced by some drivers
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX Sport review

Tire B CrossContact UHP

Pros

  • Excellent dry and wet grip
  • Smooth and comfortable ride on compatible vehicles
  • Inspires confidence in handling and cornering

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, especially on front axles
  • High road noise
  • Firm or hard ride over bumps
All owner themes in the CrossContact UHP review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental CrossContact LX Sport

Mixed

Community opinion on the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport is mixed, with some drivers praising its comfort, balance of control, and low road noise. However, many owners express dissatisfaction with rapid tread wear, flaking or chunking, poor wet traction, and shallow initial tread depth. Several users consider replacing them early with options like Michelin CrossClimate or Defender models.

bobistheoilguy.com ·2022-08-25

“Trav- someone I know has these and likes them, good experience so far. When I look on TR, DT it does not show the 235-55-20 as an option. Maybe just current supply issues? I tried the Toyo website directly and it doesn't list them as being an option either. The Celsius Sport, yes, but not the Celsius CUV? The Walmart link doesn't have a purchase option for me just "show nearby availability" but none show. Your thoughts on the Celsius "Sport" if he was looking at that? My experience was with Continental CrossContact LX Sport and Bridgestone Dueler H/P Sport AS. They were both good dry and wet, wore out fast, total safety hazards in the snow, like plastic sled or saucer on a snowy hill bad. For me if winter/snow is a possibility and need reliable traction, anything tire that says sport is not.”

r/crv ·3 upvotes ·2026-04-30

“2024 EXL Tire Review - Continental Cross Contact LX Sport 245/60/18 Replaced the oem tires with only 10,000 miles with these after reading reviews and the price point. Very happy with them, better handling and feel with less road noise and much better on grooved pavement. The oem Bridgestones wandered badly on grooved pavement. Highly recommended. Read more”

mbworld.org

“It’s a compromise between ‘comfort’ ride and safety and handling. Advance driving course will add around 8psi cold. I find on any rim size additional 4psi makes a difference. Why ? Under heavy braking the tyre collapsed in the middle, by running higher inflation the complete width of the type is on the road, better braking efficiency - if under inflated only the outer edges keep in contact with the ground, causing less efficiency and longer distance to stop. Higher inflation also ensures tyre does not warp and twist on rim when turning. Too much inflation is just as bad, only the middle touches road - less braking efficiency and wear out tyre quicker. OEM recommended pressure is for comfort and sometimes sees increased edge wear over life of tyre. Regular tyre rotation and wheel balance and alignment will maximise tyre life. Try for yourself, But I have found around 4psi extra when cold is optimum.”

Top themes
#premature tread wear#wet weather traction#OEM tire replacement#tire inflation pressure#ride comfort and road noise#EV efficiency comparison

Based on 26 community posts

Tire B

Continental CrossContact UHP

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX Sport B · Continental CrossContact UHP
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available3927
Rim diameters16″ – 22″16″ – 23″
Tread depth9/32″9 - 10/32″
UTQG480 A A280 - 420 A - AA A
SidewallBlackwallBlack Side Wall
Max pressure51 psi50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common1414

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX Sport

Continental CrossContact UHP

Winner: Continental CrossContact UHP — better handling, treadwear and dry. Pick the Continental CrossContact LX Sport if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact UHP scores 64 vs 46 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Continental CrossContact UHP scores 53 vs 40 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental CrossContact UHP scores 69 vs 59 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact UHP scores 70 vs 61 on wet.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Tire B · Continental CrossContact UHP

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX Sport or CrossContact UHP?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX Sport or CrossContact UHP?

Continental CrossContact UHP, 70 vs 61 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX Sport or CrossContact UHP?

Continental CrossContact UHP, 69 vs 59 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX Sport or CrossContact UHP?

Continental CrossContact LX Sport, 62 vs 56 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX Sport or CrossContact UHP?

Continental CrossContact UHP, 68 vs 64 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX Sport or CrossContact UHP?

Continental CrossContact UHP, 65 vs 62 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX Sport or CrossContact UHP?

Continental CrossContact UHP, 53 vs 40 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology