Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX Sport vs Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 561 + 0 owner reviews. How we score

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Continental CrossContact LX Sport
± 7

Tests – · none yet Owners 48 · 561 reviews

“My tires were over inflated at purchase - with rears on my 2020 GLC 300 SUV showing 41.5 PSi, and the fronts were ~ 38.5 PSI. Checked cold tire pressure around sunrise this morning with temperature around 50 degrees. Using a high quality tire pressure gauge checked all tires this morning - and reduced pressure in all four tires to 35 PSI. Before the ride was ok but a bit stiff. Just curious if anyone is running these 18" tires and what you feel works best for your GLC 300's. I'd like to hear your thoughts & comments re: inflation pressure. 235/60 R 18 Continental Cross Contact LX Sport Tire size Inner fuel door pressurre table”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 59

    Dry

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportAssurance ComforTred Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 62 (est.)–
    Reviews found online55–

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 54.7 = 59

    No road tests of dry for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 61

    Wet

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportAssurance ComforTred Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online57–

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 63.2 (est.) + 40% × 57.1 = 61

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 62

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportAssurance ComforTred Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)–
    Reviews found online57–

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 65.8 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 62

    No road tests of snow for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 62

    Comfort

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportAssurance ComforTred Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online58–

    CrossContact LX Sport: 40% × 67.1 (est.) + 60% × 58 = 62

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 64

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportAssurance ComforTred Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online61–

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 61.1 = 64

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 40

    Treadwear

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportAssurance ComforTred Touring
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 51 (est.)–
    Reviews found online23–

    CrossContact LX Sport: 60% × 51 (est.) + 40% × 22.6 = 40

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX Sport. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 46

    Handling (owners)

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX SportAssurance ComforTred Touring
    Reviews found online46–
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact LX Sport vs Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX SportGoodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring
Relative Score 57 –
Dry 59 –
Wet 61 –
Snow 62 –
Comfort 62 –
Noise 64 –
Treadwear 40 –
Handling (owners) 46 –

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX Sport

Assurance ComforTred Touring

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX Sport

Pros

  • Low road noise and exceptional cabin comfort
  • Strong handling and reliable grip in wet and dry conditions
  • Confident performance in light snow and winter weather

Cons

  • Disappointing tread life and faster-than-expected wear
  • Occasional reports of reduced traction in heavy mud or specific slick conditions
  • Higher price point relative to the longevity experienced by some drivers
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX Sport review

Tire B Assurance ComforTred Touring

Not enough owner reviews yet to extract themes.

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental CrossContact LX Sport

Mixed

Community opinion on the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport is mixed, with some drivers praising its comfort, balance of control, and low road noise. However, many owners express dissatisfaction with rapid tread wear, flaking or chunking, poor wet traction, and shallow initial tread depth. Several users consider replacing them early with options like Michelin CrossClimate or Defender models.

r/crvhybrid ·10 upvotes ·2026-05-07

“CRV-Hybrid Touring owners, how do you like your OEM tires? I'm a proud new owner of a '26 ST and I have the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport tires on my car. I'm not crazy about them. I'm wondering if I should upgrade to Michelin Defenders or something. Thoughts? The Touring comes with the Continental Cross Contact LX Sport (not to be confused with LX25) or the Michelin Primacy A/S. I sorta wish I would have pushed them to switch me to the Primacy A/S. Read more”

swedespeed.com ·1 upvote ·2026-03-14

“I'm a fan of the Pirelli Scorpion WeatherActives, picked those over the Cross Climate 2s for my XC90 . Not a fan of the Continental CrossContact LX Sports on the wife's 2025 XC60 . Handling in wet feels like absolute garbage, but can't justify swapping them out just yet, but plan to put the WeatherActives or Cross Climate 3s, that's if they come to the States, on her ride when tread is down. Both vehicles ride on 20" rims. I'm also a fan of Vredsteins Quartrac Pro+ and the Nokian Remedy WRG5. Looks like Nokian's Encompass AW02 are in the same vein as the Cross Climate 2 design.”

bobistheoilguy.com ·2022-08-25

“Trav- someone I know has these and likes them, good experience so far. When I look on TR, DT it does not show the 235-55-20 as an option. Maybe just current supply issues? I tried the Toyo website directly and it doesn't list them as being an option either. The Celsius Sport, yes, but not the Celsius CUV? The Walmart link doesn't have a purchase option for me just "show nearby availability" but none show. Your thoughts on the Celsius "Sport" if he was looking at that? My experience was with Continental CrossContact LX Sport and Bridgestone Dueler H/P Sport AS. They were both good dry and wet, wore out fast, total safety hazards in the snow, like plastic sled or saucer on a snowy hill bad. For me if winter/snow is a possibility and need reliable traction, anything tire that says sport is not.”

Top themes
#premature tread wear#wet weather traction#OEM tire replacement#tire inflation pressure#ride comfort and road noise#EV efficiency comparison

Based on 26 community posts

Tire B

Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX Sport B · Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring
CategoryAll SeasonTouring All Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available39—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth9/32″11 - 12/32″
UTQG480 A A640 - 740 A B
SidewallBlackwallVertical Serrated Band
Max pressure51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX Sport

Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring

Only Continental CrossContact LX Sport has enough test and review data for a Relative Score, so there is no head-to-head winner yet.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX Sport
Tire B · Goodyear Assurance ComforTred Touring

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology