Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 79 · 26 reviews
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Continental ExtremeContact DW — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 10 owner reviews. How we score
CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 73–64
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 10 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
CrossContact LX25 +570Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 ExtremeContact DW Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 83 71 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.7 = 75
ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 71.3 = 70
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
80
Wet
CrossContact LX25 +773Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 ExtremeContact DW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 77 (est.) ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 83 73 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80
ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 72.1 (est.) + 40% × 73.3 = 73
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
CrossContact LX25 +251Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 ExtremeContact DW Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 40 ≈ 60 (est.) Reviews found online 72 38 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 53
ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 60.3 (est.) + 40% × 38.3 = 51
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
76
Comfort
CrossContact LX25 +967Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 ExtremeContact DW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 79 66 CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76
ExtremeContact DW: 40% × 68.2 (est.) + 60% × 66.4 = 67
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
71
Noise
CrossContact LX25 +368Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 ExtremeContact DW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 78 70 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 71
ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25 or ExtremeContact DW. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
CrossContact LX25 +2349Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 ExtremeContact DW Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 56 (est.) Reviews found online 76 38 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 38.3 = 49
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
CrossContact LX25 +2158Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 ExtremeContact DW Reviews found online 79 58
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Continental ExtremeContact DW |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 64 |
| Dry | 75 | 70 |
| Wet | 80 | 73 |
| Snow | 53 | 51 |
| Comfort | 76 | 67 |
| Noise | 71 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 49 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 58 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
CrossContact LX25
ExtremeContact DW
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | CrossContact LX25 | ExtremeContact DW | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | #3/4 2011 Tirerack Max Performance Summer Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Tire B ExtremeContact DW
Pros
- Outstanding wet and dry grip
- Quiet and comfortable highway cruising
- High traction for acceleration and handling stability
Cons
- Extremely soft sidewalls causing vague handling response
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Vulnerability to potholes, bubbles, and sidewall damage
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Continental ExtremeContact DW |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Summer |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 40 | 1 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 21″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | 10/32″ |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | 340 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX25
Continental ExtremeContact DW
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better treadwear, handling and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental ExtremeContact DW rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 72 vs 49 on treadwear.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 58 on handling.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 67 on comfort.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 73 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact LX25 or ExtremeContact DW?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or ExtremeContact DW?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or ExtremeContact DW?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 70 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or ExtremeContact DW?
Neither, by our numbers: 53 vs 51 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or ExtremeContact DW?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 68 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or ExtremeContact DW?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 67 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or ExtremeContact DW?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 49 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology