Tests – · none yet Owners 59 · 10 reviews
Continental ExtremeContact DW vs Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 10 + 93 owner reviews. How we score
Ventus V12 evo2 leads, 69–66 Narrow edge
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 68 · 93 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
70
Dry
Ventus V12 evo2 +171Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Ventus V12 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 70 (est.) 71 Reviews found online 72 71 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 69.6 (est.) + 40% × 71.7 = 70
Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 70.9 + 40% × 71.4 = 71
No road tests of dry for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
73
Wet
ExtremeContact DW +271Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Ventus V12 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 72 (est.) 69 Reviews found online 74 73 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 72.3 (est.) + 40% × 73.5 = 73
Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 69.2 + 40% × 73.1 = 71
No road tests of wet for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
51
Snow
No comparison–Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Ventus V12 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) – Reviews found online 39 – ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 58.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.1 = 51
No road tests of snow for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).
-
68
Comfort
ExtremeContact DW +167Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Ventus V12 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 68 (est.) Reviews found online 67 66 ExtremeContact DW: 40% × 68.8 (est.) + 60% × 67.1 = 68
Ventus V12 evo2: 40% × 68.5 (est.) + 60% × 65.6 = 67
No road tests of comfort for ExtremeContact DW or Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
68
Noise
Ventus V12 evo2 +573Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Ventus V12 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 78 Reviews found online 70 ≈ 67 (est.) ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 68
Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 77.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 73
No road tests of noise for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for Ventus V12 evo2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
49
Treadwear
Ventus V12 evo2 +1261Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Ventus V12 evo2 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 56 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 38 58 ExtremeContact DW: 60% × 56.3 (est.) + 40% × 38.1 = 49
Ventus V12 evo2: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 58.3 = 61
No road tests of treadwear for ExtremeContact DW. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for Ventus V12 evo2. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
58
Handling (owners)
Ventus V12 evo2 +1270Why this score
Source ExtremeContact DW Ventus V12 evo2 Reviews found online 58 70
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental ExtremeContact DW | Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 66 | 69 |
| Dry | 70 | 71 |
| Wet | 73 | 71 |
| Snow | 51 | – |
| Comfort | 68 | 67 |
| Noise | 68 | 73 |
| Treadwear | 49 | 61 |
| Handling (owners) | 58 | 70 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
ExtremeContact DW
Ventus V12 evo2
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | ExtremeContact DW | Ventus V12 evo2 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #3/4 2011 Tirerack Max Performance Summer Tyre Test | #4/5 2017 Car and Driver UHP Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A ExtremeContact DW
Pros
- Outstanding wet and dry grip
- Quiet and comfortable highway cruising
- High traction for acceleration and handling stability
Cons
- Extremely soft sidewalls causing vague handling response
- Rapid tread wear and short lifespan
- Vulnerability to potholes, bubbles, and sidewall damage
Tire B Ventus V12 evo2
Pros
- Excellent value and cost-to-performance ratio compared to premium brands
- Strong, reliable grip in both dry and wet conditions with good aquaplaning resistance
- Comfortable ride with low initial road noise
Cons
- Soft sidewalls can cause a floaty feel or roll during aggressive cornering and track use
- Road noise increases noticeably as the tires wear down
- Treadwear is relatively fast, leading to shorter overall mileage
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental ExtremeContact DW | B · Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | Summer |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 1 | 38 |
| Rim diameters | 21″ | 15″ – 21″ |
| Tread depth | 10/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 340 A A | — |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | — |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental ExtremeContact DW
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2
Narrow edge: Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 — better treadwear, handling and noise. Where the Continental ExtremeContact DW is ahead, it is by less than 3 points. Continental ExtremeContact DW rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 10 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 61 vs 49 on treadwear.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 70 vs 58 on handling.
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2 scores 73 vs 68 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
ExtremeContact DW or Ventus V12 evo2?
Which is better in the wet, ExtremeContact DW or Ventus V12 evo2?
Neither, by our numbers: 73 vs 71 on the wet score, within 3 points.
Which grips better on dry roads, ExtremeContact DW or Ventus V12 evo2?
Neither, by our numbers: 70 vs 71 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, ExtremeContact DW or Ventus V12 evo2?
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 73 vs 68 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, ExtremeContact DW or Ventus V12 evo2?
Neither, by our numbers: 68 vs 67 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, ExtremeContact DW or Ventus V12 evo2?
Hankook Ventus V12 evo2, 61 vs 49 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology