Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken Sincera SN250 A/S — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 47 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 73–65

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    CrossContact LX25 +7
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Sincera SN250 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8470

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 83.5 = 76

    Sincera SN250 A/S: 60% × 68.7 (est.) + 40% × 69.5 = 69

    No road tests of dry for Sincera SN250 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 80

    Wet

    CrossContact LX25 +10
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Sincera SN250 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 71 (est.)
    Reviews found online8470

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.9 (est.) + 40% × 83.6 = 80

    Sincera SN250 A/S: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 70.4 = 70

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Sincera SN250 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Sincera SN250 A/S +7
    60
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Sincera SN250 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests40≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7254

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.3 + 40% × 72.2 = 53

    Sincera SN250 A/S: 60% × 64.4 (est.) + 40% × 53.6 = 60

    No road tests of snow for Sincera SN250 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.37).

  4. 77

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +19
    58
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Sincera SN250 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online8052

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 71.2 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77

    Sincera SN250 A/S: 40% × 66 (est.) + 60% × 52.2 = 58

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25 or Sincera SN250 A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Noise

    CrossContact LX25 +3
    68
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Sincera SN250 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)≈ 67 (est.)
    Reviews found online7870

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 78 = 71

    Sincera SN250 A/S: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 69.8 = 68

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25 or Sincera SN250 A/S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    CrossContact LX25 +9
    63
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Sincera SN250 A/S
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 64 (est.)
    Reviews found online7661

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72

    Sincera SN250 A/S: 60% × 64.2 (est.) + 40% × 60.5 = 63

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Sincera SN250 A/S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +22
    57
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Sincera SN250 A/S
    Reviews found online7957
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken Sincera SN250 A/S: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Falken Sincera SN250 A/S
Relative Score 73 65
Dry 76 69
Wet 80 70
Snow 53 60
Comfort 77 58
Noise 71 68
Treadwear 72 63
Handling (owners) 79 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 7

Sincera SN250 A/S

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B Sincera SN250 A/S

Pros

  • Exceptional value and competitive pricing compared to more expensive alternatives
  • Smooth, comfortable, and quiet ride quality
  • Good traction and grip in both dry and wet weather conditions

Cons

  • Some users reported disappointing tread life falling short of expectations
  • Occasional complaints regarding poor winter and snow traction
  • A few reports of sidewall bulges developing prematurely
All owner themes in the Sincera SN250 A/S review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Falken Sincera SN250 A/S
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season tire
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4SUV and 4x4
Sizes available4059
Rim diameters16″ – 22″14″ – 18″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″11/32″
UTQG740 A A - B720 A B
Treadwear warranty—80,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi51 psi
Sizes in common1313

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Falken Sincera SN250 A/S

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the Falken Sincera SN250 A/S if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 77 vs 58 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 70 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the longest tread life

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 72 vs 63 on treadwear.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Falken Sincera SN250 A/S

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or Sincera SN250 A/S?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Sincera SN250 A/S?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 70 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Sincera SN250 A/S?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 69 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or Sincera SN250 A/S?

Falken Sincera SN250 A/S, 60 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or Sincera SN250 A/S?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 68 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Sincera SN250 A/S?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 77 vs 58 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Sincera SN250 A/S?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 63 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology