tirewheelguide

Falken ZIEX ZE329 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Falken ZIEX ZE329 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 23 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 73–49

Check price on Amazon · CrossContact LX25 or ZIEX ZE329 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE329
Tire BFalken

ZIEX ZE329

All-Season

± 8

Tests – · none yet Owners 39 · 23 reviews

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    CrossContact LX25 +27
    48
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online8338

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.7 = 75

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.5 (est.) + 40% × 37.9 = 48

    No road tests of dry for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).

  2. 80

    Wet

    CrossContact LX25 +29
    51
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 56 (est.)
    Reviews found online8343

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.2 = 80

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.7 (est.) + 40% × 43.4 = 51

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    ZIEX ZE329 +4
    57
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests40≈ 63 (est.)
    Reviews found online7247

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.6 = 53

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 63.1 (est.) + 40% × 47.2 = 57

    No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).

  4. 76

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +33
    43
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 61 (est.)
    Reviews found online7931

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76

    ZIEX ZE329: 40% × 61 (est.) + 60% × 31 = 43

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

    No road tests of comfort for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Noise

    CrossContact LX25 +11
    60
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 66 (est.)≈ 66 (est.)
    Reviews found online7750

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 71

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 50.1 = 60

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25 or ZIEX ZE329. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    CrossContact LX25 +27
    45
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX ZE329
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 70 (est.)≈ 54 (est.)
    Reviews found online7632

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 54.1 (est.) + 40% × 31.8 = 45

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

    No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +40
    39
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25ZIEX ZE329
    Reviews found online7939
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Falken ZIEX ZE329
Relative Score 73 49
Dry 75 48
Wet 80 51
Snow 53 57
Comfort 76 43
Noise 71 60
Treadwear 72 45
Handling (owners) 79 39

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 8

ZIEX ZE329

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B ZIEX ZE329

Pros

  • Affordable price point offering great value
  • Good traction and grip on dry pavement
  • Balanced overall performance for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, falling short of expected mileage
  • Poor wet and winter weather traction, described as dangerous in snow
  • Excessive road noise and highway hum reported by multiple users
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE329 review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Falken ZIEX ZE329
CategoryAll SeasonAll-Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available40—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10 - 12/32″6/32″
UTQG740 A A - B480 A A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlackwall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi51 psi

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Falken ZIEX ZE329

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better handling, comfort and wet. Pick the Falken ZIEX ZE329 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 39 on handling.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 43 on comfort.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 51 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 75 vs 48 on dry.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Falken ZIEX ZE329
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or ZIEX ZE329?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or ZIEX ZE329?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or ZIEX ZE329?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 48 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or ZIEX ZE329?

Falken ZIEX ZE329, 57 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or ZIEX ZE329?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 60 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or ZIEX ZE329?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 43 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or ZIEX ZE329?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 45 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology