tirewheelguide

Falken ZIEX ZE329 looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Falken ZIEX ZE329 vs Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 0 + 13 road tests and 23 + 2,504 owner reviews. How we score

Ventus Prime 4 is ahead, 75–50

Check price on Amazon · Ventus Prime 4 or ZIEX ZE329 on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Falken ZIEX ZE329
Tire AFalken

ZIEX ZE329

All-Season

Tests – · none yet Owners 41 · 23 reviews

Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Tire BHankook

Ventus Prime 4

Summer

Tests 77 · 13 tests Owners 73 · 2,504 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 21 in 2022 Auto Bild Summer Tyre Test (dry handling)

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 50

    Dry

    Ventus Prime 4 +30
    80
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 11 tests≈ 56 (est.)84
    Reviews found online4076

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 56.4 (est.) + 40% × 39.6 = 50

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 83.7 + 40% × 75.6 = 80

    No road tests of dry for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.40).

  2. 51

    Wet

    Ventus Prime 4 +27
    78
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests≈ 56 (est.)80
    Reviews found online4576

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.8 (est.) + 40% × 44.8 = 51

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 79.8 + 40% × 76.2 = 78

    No road tests of wet for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 57

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 63 (est.)–
    Reviews found online48–

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 62.5 (est.) + 40% × 47.7 = 57

    No road tests of snow for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.33).

  4. 51

    Comfort

    Ventus Prime 4 +19
    70
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests≈ 63 (est.)70
    Reviews found online3471

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 63 (est.) + 40% × 33.7 = 51

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 70.3 + 40% × 70.5 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 62

    Noise

    ZIEX ZE329 +1
    61
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 8 tests≈ 67 (est.)58
    Reviews found online53≈ 67 (est.)

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 53.2 = 62

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 57.6 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 61

    No road tests of noise for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Ventus Prime 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 46

    Treadwear

    Ventus Prime 4 +27
    73
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329Ventus Prime 4
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 5 tests≈ 55 (est.)76
    Reviews found online3269

    ZIEX ZE329: 60% × 55.3 (est.) + 40% × 32 = 46

    Ventus Prime 4: 60% × 76.4 + 40% × 69 = 73

    No road tests of treadwear for ZIEX ZE329. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 41

    Handling (owners)

    Ventus Prime 4 +33
    74
    Why this score
    SourceZIEX ZE329Ventus Prime 4
    Reviews found online4174
Scores at a glance
CategoryFalken ZIEX ZE329Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Relative Score 50 75
Dry 50 80
Wet 51 78
Snow 57 –
Comfort 51 70
Noise 62 61
Treadwear 46 73
Handling (owners) 41 74

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

ZIEX ZE329

Ventus Prime 4

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A ZIEX ZE329

Pros

  • Affordable price point offering great value
  • Good traction and grip on dry pavement
  • Balanced overall performance for everyday commuting

Cons

  • Rapid and premature tread wear, falling short of expected mileage
  • Poor wet and winter weather traction, described as dangerous in snow
  • Excessive road noise and highway hum reported by multiple users
All owner themes in the ZIEX ZE329 review

Tire B Ventus Prime 4

Pros

  • Exceptional wet and dry grip providing high confidence
  • Significantly reduced road noise and smooth, quiet ride quality
  • Competitively priced offering great value compared to top-tier premium brands

Cons

  • Accelerated tread wear reported by some users, leading to shorter overall tire life
  • Noticeable decrease in wet traction and grip as the tread wears down past the halfway mark
  • Stiffer sidewalls can translate to a firmer ride or reduced comfort on rough surfaces
All owner themes in the Ventus Prime 4 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Falken ZIEX ZE329

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Positive

Community opinion on the Hankook Ventus Prime 4 is largely positive, with drivers viewing it as a comfortable, quiet, and capable touring tire. Users frequently praise its strong dry and wet performance alongside its compelling price-to-performance ratio compared to premium alternatives like Michelin. Some uncertainties exist regarding long-term tread wear and slight fuel economy impacts, but owners generally report satisfactory everyday reliability.

r/tires ·3 upvotes ·2026-10-09

“Found a cut on one of my tires, is it 100% cooked? Three month old Hankook Ventus Prime 4, covered less than 600miles. Found a small cut on the front right one. It is holding air fine. I will go to a tire shop to get checked asap, but chances that it’s ok? And what could have caused it? Hitting a curb? Thank you in advance!”
r/AutomobileRO ·2 upvotes ·2025-03-23

“Simbolul cu mașina și fulgerul de pe Hankook Ventus Prime 4 arată că anvelopa e compatibilă și cu mașini electrice (EV), nu că e destinată exclusiv lor. Poate fi folosită fără probleme și pe mașini cu motor termic.”
teslamotorsclub.com ·2023-09-01

“MOT coming up on the 29th and the rear tyres won't make it. Front tyres have a bit of wear left but I'm wondering if I should do all four now or the rears now and then the fronts sometime in about 6 months or so. Better deals on 4 tyres though ... but then I'd be throwing away 2 decent tyres with some use still in them so ... Also, looking on KiwkFit... any reason why I wouldn't go for the Ventus Prime 4s over the Michelins?”
Top themes
#value for money#comfort and low noise#wet and dry grip#comparison with premium brands#tread longevity questions#touring versus sports handling

Based on 41 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Falken ZIEX ZE329 B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
CategoryAll-SeasonSummer
Vehicle typePassenger Car / Crossover—
Sizes available—66
Rim diameters—15″ – 20″
Tread depth6/32″—
UTQG480 A A—
Treadwear warranty60,000 mi—
SidewallBlackwall—
Max pressure51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Falken ZIEX ZE329

Hankook Ventus Prime 4

Winner: Hankook Ventus Prime 4 — better handling, dry and wet. Where the Falken ZIEX ZE329 is ahead, it is by less than 3 points.

Pick tire B You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 74 vs 41 on handling.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 80 vs 50 on dry.

Pick tire B Your priority is wet-weather safety

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 78 vs 51 on wet.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Hankook Ventus Prime 4 scores 73 vs 46 on treadwear.

Tire A · Falken ZIEX ZE329
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Hankook Ventus Prime 4
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

ZIEX ZE329 or Ventus Prime 4?

Which is better in the wet, ZIEX ZE329 or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 78 vs 51 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, ZIEX ZE329 or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 80 vs 50 on our dry score.

Which is quieter, ZIEX ZE329 or Ventus Prime 4?

Neither, by our numbers: 62 vs 61 on the noise score, within 3 points.

Which is more comfortable, ZIEX ZE329 or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 70 vs 51 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, ZIEX ZE329 or Ventus Prime 4?

Hankook Ventus Prime 4, 73 vs 46 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology