Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 78 · 26 reviews
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 3 road tests and 26 + 4 owner reviews. How we score
CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 72–61
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 3 tests Owners 51 · 4 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 8 in 2018 Vi Studded Winter Tyre Test (wet braking)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
CrossContact LX25 +1560Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 UltraGrip Ice Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests 70 73 Reviews found online 83 42 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.6 = 75
UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 72.6 + 40% × 42.2 = 60
-
78
Wet
CrossContact LX25 +1365Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 UltraGrip Ice Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests ≈ 76 (est.) 74 Reviews found online 81 52 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 76.2 (est.) + 40% × 81.3 = 78
UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 52.1 = 65
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).
-
53
Snow
UltraGrip Ice Arctic +1972Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 UltraGrip Ice Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 3 tests 40 74 Reviews found online 71 68 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.3 + 40% × 71.2 = 53
UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 74.3 + 40% × 67.9 = 72
-
74
Comfort
CrossContact LX25 +1955Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 UltraGrip Ice Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 64 (est.) Reviews found online 79 41 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.3 = 74
UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 64.3 (est.) + 40% × 41.2 = 55
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25 or UltraGrip Ice Arctic. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Noise
No comparison–Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 UltraGrip Ice Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) – Reviews found online 77 – CrossContact LX25: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 71
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Treadwear
CrossContact LX25 +1754Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 UltraGrip Ice Arctic Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 59 (est.) Reviews found online 74 45 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 71
UltraGrip Ice Arctic: 60% × 59.3 (est.) + 40% × 45.1 = 54
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
No road tests of treadwear for UltraGrip Ice Arctic. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).
-
79
Handling (owners)
CrossContact LX25 +3049Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 UltraGrip Ice Arctic Reviews found online 79 49
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 61 |
| Dry | 75 | 60 |
| Wet | 78 | 65 |
| Snow | 53 | 72 |
| Comfort | 74 | 55 |
| Noise | 71 | – |
| Treadwear | 71 | 54 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 49 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossContact LX25
UltraGrip Ice Arctic
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | CrossContact LX25 | UltraGrip Ice Arctic | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 93% #3/8 · 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 68% #3/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 96% #4/8 · 2019 Studded Winter Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | #4/5 2021 Test World Winter Studded Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Tire B UltraGrip Ice Arctic
Pros
- Excellent traction and handling on packed snow
- Strong performance on ice during the first two seasons
- Reliable winter grip in extreme arctic conditions
Cons
- Significant stud loss after two seasons of use
- Abrupt and dangerous decline in grip performance by the third year
- Poor longevity relative to competitors despite remaining tread depth
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 40 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX25
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better handling, comfort and treadwear. Pick the Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic if snow matters most to you.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 49 on handling.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 74 vs 55 on comfort.
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic scores 72 vs 53 on snow.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 71 vs 54 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact LX25 or UltraGrip Ice Arctic?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or UltraGrip Ice Arctic?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 78 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or UltraGrip Ice Arctic?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 60 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or UltraGrip Ice Arctic?
Goodyear UltraGrip Ice Arctic, 72 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or UltraGrip Ice Arctic?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 74 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or UltraGrip Ice Arctic?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 54 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology