Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews. Based on 1 + 24 road tests and 26 + 3,636 owner reviews. How we score

Too close to call: CrossContact LX25 72, Kinergy 4S2 71.

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Tire BHankook

Kinergy 4S2

All Season

Tests 78 · 24 tests Owners 61 · 3,636 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (curved aquaplaning)

“Hankook's 3-peak all-season tire, also called all-weather, is finally available from TR, though it had been out awhile now, when it replaced the 4S (4s1?) that was sold in Canada, but not the US. Like all the other 3-peak all-seasons that they carry, TR classifies the 4S2 as grand touring all-season”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    CrossContact LX25 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 23 tests7082
    Reviews found online8358

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.6 = 75

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 82.2 + 40% × 57.5 = 72

  2. 78

    Wet

    Level
    78
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 23 tests≈ 76 (est.)85
    Reviews found online8167

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 76.2 (est.) + 40% × 81.3 = 78

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 85.5 + 40% × 66.7 = 78

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.56).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Kinergy 4S2 +19
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 18 tests4079
    Reviews found online7163

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.3 + 40% × 71.2 = 53

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 62.6 = 72

  4. 74

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +4
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests≈ 71 (est.)77
    Reviews found online7960

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.9 (est.) + 40% × 79.3 = 74

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 76.5 + 40% × 60.2 = 70

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Noise

    CrossContact LX25 +5
    66
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 18 tests≈ 67 (est.)66
    Reviews found online77≈ 67 (est.)

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 71

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 65.6 + 40% × 67.3 (est.) = 66

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S2. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 71

    Treadwear

    CrossContact LX25 +4
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 9 tests≈ 68 (est.)71
    Reviews found online7460

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 74.4 = 71

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 71.2 + 40% × 60.4 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.31).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +22
    57
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Reviews found online7957
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Relative Score 72 71
Dry 75 72
Wet 78 78
Snow 53 72
Comfort 74 70
Noise 71 66
Treadwear 71 67
Handling (owners) 79 57

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score

CrossContact LX25

Kinergy 4S2

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady 94% #7/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 68% #3/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady 93% #8/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady #5/16 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B Kinergy 4S2

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather grip, braking, and aquaplaning resistance
  • Strong performance and confidence in cold temperatures, light snow, and slush
  • High overall value for money compared to premium tier alternatives

Cons

  • Increased road noise and occasional highway 'whining' or howling between 120-140 km/h
  • Some reports of faster-than-expected tread wear or uneven inner tread deformation
  • Softer sidewalls can induce initial steering delay or a slight floating feel during aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the Kinergy 4S2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental CrossContact LX25

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Mixed

Community members frequently view the Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 as a solid, budget-friendly alternative to premium all-weather tires like the Michelin CrossClimate 2, highlighting its strong wet traction and good snow performance for the price. However, users report mixed experiences regarding tread longevity, with some noting rapid or uneven wear, as well as drawbacks such as highway humming noise, a stiff ride, and twitchy handling on ice.

teslamotorsclub.com ·3 upvotes ·2023-12-30

“I've been running the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 all seasons on my M3 for just over a year - great tyres, esp in the wet, although they take a few hundred miles to scrub in (a touch "slippery" until then, so care is needed pulling out of junctions, etc). They placed 2nd behing the CrossClimate 2s in the 2022 all-season tyre test on Tyre Reviews, and were considered better overall in milder, wet conditions (bulk of UK basically!), which is why I chose them over the CC2s. Only had the recent spell of wintry weather to check the snow/ice performance - no issues with snow, but felt twitchy on ice. Supply seems limited this year - only place I've seen them listed in M3 18" size is ATS Euromaster, whereas I could have also got them from Halfords & Kwikfit last year.”

r/TyreReviews ·3 upvotes ·2025-10-15

“Hankook Kinergy 4S2 vs Continental AllSeasonContact 2 For the past 3 years I have been using the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 195/55R15 and I am super happy with them, but a little over 50,000km in it is time to get new shoes this winter. I have driven in snow and they felt quite ok. Now I am looking to either get them again since I enjoyed them, or try the Continental AllSeasonContact 2 - but they only come in 185/55R15. I have read that narrower tires are better in the snow - most of the driving I do is on maintained roads but we do go into the mountains for a few weekends through winter usuallly. First of all, are the Continental a big step up from the Hankooks, like-for-like? Secondly, would the width difference be a significant factor in snow performance gain or dry/wet performance loss? And if it is better to have the narrower tire, would the Hankook in 185/55R15 be still a reasonable move from my current 195/55? Price-wise: Continental AllSeasonContact 2 185/55 R15 - 100Eur Hankook Kinergy 4S2 185/55 R15 - 79Eur Hankook Kinergy 4S2 195/55 R15 - 84Eur Cheers :) Read more”

r/mercedes_benz ·8 upvotes ·2026-09-06

“Tire recommendations E-class Hi all, I've been enjoying my first E-class for a couple months now. The only thing that has been bothering me is the loud noise the tires make at about 130 kph. I've ruled everything out so I'm really certain it is just the tires. They are hankook kinergy 4s2 h750 all seasons, so a bit of noise is to be expected but these really make a loud humming noise at highway speeds. Does anyone have recommendation for quiet all season tires? They do need to have the 3pmsf certifaction. My sizes are front: 245/40 R19 & back: 275/35 R19. Read more”

Top themes
#Affordable CrossClimate alternative#Wet weather traction#Snow and winter performance#Tread wear longevity#Cabin road noise#Ride stiffness and comfort

Based on 33 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Hankook Kinergy 4S2
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4095
Rim diameters16″ – 22″14″ – 20″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common77

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Too close to call: Continental CrossContact LX25 and Hankook Kinergy 4S2 are within 2 points overall. Continental CrossContact LX25 is stronger on handling, noise and comfort. Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is stronger on snow.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 57 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scores 72 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 71 vs 66 on noise.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 74 vs 70 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy 4S2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or Kinergy 4S2?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Kinergy 4S2?

Neither, by our numbers: 78 vs 78 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Kinergy 4S2?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or Kinergy 4S2?

Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 72 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or Kinergy 4S2?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 66 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Kinergy 4S2?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 74 vs 70 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Kinergy 4S2?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology