Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 27 road tests and 26 + 3,669 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact LX25 leads, 73–70 Narrow edge

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Tire BHankook

Kinergy 4S2

All Season

± 4

Tests 78 · 27 tests Owners 60 · 3,669 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 16 in 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 (curved aquaplaning)

“Tire recommendations E-class Hi all, I've been enjoying my first E-class for a couple months now. The only thing that has been bothering me is the loud noise the tires make at about 130 kph. I've ruled everything out so I'm really certain it is just the tires. They are hankook kinergy 4s2 h750 all seasons, so a bit of noise is to be expected but these really make a loud humming noise at highway speeds. Does anyone have recommendation for quiet all season tires? They do need to have the 3pmsf certifaction. My sizes are front: 245/40 R19 & back: 275/35 R19. Read more”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    CrossContact LX25 +3
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 26 tests7083
    Reviews found online8356

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.8 = 75

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 82.9 + 40% × 56 = 72

  2. 80

    Wet

    CrossContact LX25 +2
    78
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 26 tests≈ 78 (est.)87
    Reviews found online8365

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 86.8 + 40% × 64.8 = 78

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    Kinergy 4S2 +19
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 21 tests4079
    Reviews found online7261

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 53

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 78.6 + 40% × 60.9 = 72

  4. 76

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +15
    61
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 71 (est.)72
    Reviews found online7954

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.3 = 76

    Kinergy 4S2: 40% × 71.5 + 60% × 54.3 = 61

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).

  5. 71

    Noise

    CrossContact LX25 +8
    63
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests≈ 66 (est.)62
    Reviews found online77≈ 66 (est.)

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 71

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 61.6 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 63

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

    No owner ratings of noise for Kinergy 4S2. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    CrossContact LX25 +5
    67
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests≈ 70 (est.)72
    Reviews found online7660

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72

    Kinergy 4S2: 60% × 72.5 + 40% × 59.6 = 67

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +23
    56
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Reviews found online7956
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    51
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 21 tests–51
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Hankook Kinergy 4S2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Hankook Kinergy 4S2
Relative Score 73 70
Dry 75 72
Wet 80 78
Snow 53 72
Comfort 76 61
Noise 71 63
Treadwear 72 67
Handling (owners) 79 56
Efficiency – 51

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 4

Kinergy 4S2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossContact LX25Kinergy 4S2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady 92% #6/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 68% #3/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady 96% #4/9 · 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady #7/9 2026 AMS All Season Tyre Test - 195/55 R16 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B Kinergy 4S2

Pros

  • Exceptional wet weather grip, braking, and aquaplaning resistance
  • Strong performance and confidence in cold temperatures, light snow, and slush
  • High overall value for money compared to premium tier alternatives

Cons

  • Increased road noise and occasional highway 'whining' or howling between 120-140 km/h
  • Some reports of faster-than-expected tread wear or uneven inner tread deformation
  • Softer sidewalls can induce initial steering delay or a slight floating feel during aggressive cornering
All owner themes in the Kinergy 4S2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental CrossContact LX25

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Mixed

The Hankook Kinergy 4S2 is widely regarded as a good-value 3PMSF all-weather tire, often recommended as a cheaper alternative to the Michelin CrossClimate 2 thanks to strong wet performance and good independent test results. Complaints include a stiff ride, highway road noise, fast or uneven tread wear, and weaker snow and ice grip for some owners. Several users noted that ice performance wasn't tested and that it suits milder, wet climates best.

r/mercedes_benz ·8 upvotes ·2026-09-06

“Tire recommendations E-class Hi all, I've been enjoying my first E-class for a couple months now. The only thing that has been bothering me is the loud noise the tires make at about 130 kph. I've ruled everything out so I'm really certain it is just the tires. They are hankook kinergy 4s2 h750 all seasons, so a bit of noise is to be expected but these really make a loud humming noise at highway speeds. Does anyone have recommendation for quiet all season tires? They do need to have the 3pmsf certifaction. My sizes are front: 245/40 R19 & back: 275/35 R19. Read more”

subaruoutback.org ·3 upvotes ·2022-11-09

“I had the Kinergy 4s2 tires and they were not good. They wore unevenly, especially on the outsides of the fronts and handling was poor. When cornering the tire felt like the sidewall was folding under which would explain the increased wear on the outside tread block of the tires . The alignment was verified to be perfect. Go with the CC2 or anything Nokian . I ran some old Nokian WRG2s and was very impressed. Id imagine the latest versions are also very good.”

r/KiaNiroEV ·2 upvotes ·2026-01-20

“New Tyres - Kia dealership recommend Hankook Kinergy 4S 2 H750 215/55R17 98W Just had my 40,000 service at my local Kia dealership for my ‘22 E Niro. I am going to get my tyres changed elsewhere to save a few £££’s but am just wondering if the Hankooks are a good tyre? I am looking at around £140-160 per tyre and wondering if this is a good tyre for the price or if anyone has better suggestion for similar price or cheaper?”

Top themes
#Value vs CrossClimate 2#Wet traction#Snow and ice grip#Tread wear concerns#Ride comfort stiffness#Road noise#Tyre Reviews test results#EV and range use

Based on 34 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Hankook Kinergy 4S2
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4095
Rim diameters16″ – 22″14″ – 20″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B500 A A
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—
Sizes in common77

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Hankook Kinergy 4S2

Narrow edge: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better handling, comfort and noise. Pick the Hankook Kinergy 4S2 if snow matters most to you.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 56 on handling.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Hankook Kinergy 4S2 scores 72 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 61 on comfort.

Pick tire A You want a quieter cabin

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 71 vs 63 on noise.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Hankook Kinergy 4S2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or Kinergy 4S2?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Kinergy 4S2?

Neither, by our numbers: 80 vs 78 on the wet score, within 3 points.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Kinergy 4S2?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 72 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or Kinergy 4S2?

Hankook Kinergy 4S2, 72 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or Kinergy 4S2?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 63 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Kinergy 4S2?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 61 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Kinergy 4S2?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 67 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology