Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2 — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 32 road tests and 26 + 21,691 owner reviews. How we score

CrossClimate 2 is ahead, 87–73

Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Michelin CrossClimate 2
Tire BMichelin

CrossClimate 2

All Season

± 4

Tests 87 · 32 tests Owners 87 · 21,691 reviews

Best test result: #1 of 35 in 2023 All Season Tyre 35 Set Shootout (dry braking)

“I have 60K miles on my 2019 Model X. The General is my 3rd set of tires, replacing the Michelin Cross Climate 2 that was on the car. In 200 miles, here is what I have learned so far with these General G-Max AS-07 Noise = The General is FAR superior than the Michelin Cross Climate. Matter of fact, the General is very close to the OEM Conti in this area Range = The General is running around 5% more in terms of efficiency (or lack of) compare to the OEM Conti and worn Michelin, but 5-10% more than my Michelin NEW. I only started getting the efficiency on the Michelin when the inside turned bald. Comfort = The ride is on par with the Michelin and OEM Conti, none really rode that great to begin with. Michelin was probably the best, the General is probably the worst but it isn't anything terrible. Performance = Sorry it is a Model X and it is my daily driver. I don't drive it hard enough to have any thoughts on it. Price = The General is less than $800 after rebate, Michelin and Conti are probably over $1500 at this point.”

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 75

    Dry

    CrossClimate 2 +20
    95
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 30 tests7099
    Reviews found online8388

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.8 = 75

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 99.3 + 40% × 88.4 = 95

  2. 80

    Wet

    CrossClimate 2 +6
    86
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 30 tests≈ 77 (est.)83
    Reviews found online8391

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 83.2 + 40% × 91.3 = 86

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    CrossClimate 2 +38
    91
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 26 tests4099
    Reviews found online7278

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 39.9 + 40% × 71.7 = 53

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 98.7 + 40% × 78.3 = 91

  4. 76

    Comfort

    CrossClimate 2 +1
    77
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 3 tests≈ 71 (est.)64
    Reviews found online7986

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76

    CrossClimate 2: 40% × 64 + 60% × 86.1 = 77

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Noise

    CrossClimate 2 +9
    80
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 19 tests≈ 66 (est.)78
    Reviews found online7883

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 71

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 77.6 + 40% × 82.7 = 80

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    CrossClimate 2 +12
    84
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests≈ 70 (est.)81
    Reviews found online7688

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72

    CrossClimate 2: 60% × 81.2 + 40% × 88 = 84

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossClimate 2 +3
    82
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25CrossClimate 2
    Reviews found online7982
  8. –

    Efficiency

    No comparison
    90
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25CrossClimate 2
    Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 22 tests–90
Scores at a glance
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Michelin CrossClimate 2: scores by category (0–100)
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Michelin CrossClimate 2
Relative Score 73 87
Dry 75 95
Wet 80 86
Snow 53 91
Comfort 76 77
Noise 71 80
Treadwear 72 84
Handling (owners) 79 82
Efficiency – 90

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Not important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 4

CrossClimate 2

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossContact LX25CrossClimate 2ΔHead-to-head
Dry Braking Dry 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady 100% #2/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Snow Traction Snow 68% #3/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady 96% #5/16 · 2026 ADAC All Season Tyre Test - 185/65 R15 – Different tests
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady #2/6 2026 Wybór Kierowców Winter Tire Test R17 – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B CrossClimate 2

Pros

  • Exceptional grip and traction in snow, slush, and winter weather conditions
  • Strong braking and handling performance on dry and wet pavement
  • Long-lasting tread wear and durability

Cons

  • Higher initial purchase price
  • Slight negative impact on fuel economy / EV range for some drivers
  • Potential for increased road noise or harshness as the tires wear down
All owner themes in the CrossClimate 2 review

What real owners are saying

From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score

Tire A

Continental CrossContact LX25

We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.

Tire B

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Positive

The community overwhelmingly praises the Michelin CrossClimate 2 for its exceptional snow, ice, and wet-weather traction, often describing it as an ideal all-weather tire. While many drivers report a quiet, comfortable ride and solid durability, some users note potential downsides including reduced fuel or battery efficiency, road noise on certain surfaces, and premium pricing. A few commenters also point out that the tire may be overkill for regions without significant winter weather.

r/LexusNX ·55 upvotes ·2026-06-14

“CrossClimate2 in. Alenza Run Flats out. Swapped the Alenza run flats for CrossClimate2 all-weather tires. Sharper handling. Better ride comfort. Very quiet after an initial break-in period. Just make sure the tire pressure is as recommended on the door sill sticker, shop techs don’t always check. I’m an early adopter of CC2 tires, been using them on my old Jeep since 2022, super durable and perfect for inclement weather, still had some tread remaining at the 60k-mile warranty mark.”

macheforum.com ·8 upvotes ·2021-06-28

“I have the 235 that is a little higher load rating (105 vs 103 stock and 99 for 225). I'm probably getting about a 10% range reduction, but worth it to me for the improved handling and lower braking distance. I work from home and I charge to 90% about once a week unless taking a longer drive. If I did a lot of longer trips it might be an issue, but I am very happy with these tires.”

r/volt ·8 upvotes ·2026-09-18

“Michelin CrossClimate2 efficiency surprisingly good! Just put in a new set of Michelin CrossClimate2s to go along with a move from LA to New England. I was a bit worried about the mileage/range hit but figured the safety in the winter outweighed it. I'm pleasantly surprised! On an all-highway trip from Boston to New Jersey, gas MPG was a steady 42 mpgs and I got about 45 miles on the battery, although I drive like a grandma at the posted speed limits so I think I was close to 44 mpg/45 EV miles on the old OEM tires. Around town in suburbia in good weather I'm still running between 4.0-5.0 miles/kWh. I estimate, at worst, a 5% drop in efficiency. Pretty good considering the Michelins feel so much stickier!”

Top themes
#Snow and ice traction#Wet handling and hydroplaning#Road noise and comfort#Fuel economy and range#Tread wear and longevity#Premium price point#Directional tread design

Based on 762 community posts

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Michelin CrossClimate 2
CategoryAll SeasonAll Season
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available4092
Rim diameters16″ – 22″15″ – 21″
Tread depth10 - 12/32″9 - 10/32″
UTQG740 A A - B640 B A
Treadwear warranty—60,000 mi
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White LetteringBlack Side Wall
Max pressure44 - 51 psi50 - 51 psi
Sizes in common88

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Michelin CrossClimate 2

Winner: Michelin CrossClimate 2 — better snow, dry and treadwear. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire B You drive through snowy winters

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 91 vs 53 on snow.

Pick tire B You want the most grip on dry roads

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 95 vs 75 on dry.

Pick tire B You want the longest tread life

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 84 vs 72 on treadwear.

Pick tire B You want a quieter cabin

Michelin CrossClimate 2 scores 80 vs 71 on noise.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Tire B · Michelin CrossClimate 2

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or CrossClimate 2?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 86 vs 80 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 95 vs 75 on our dry score.

Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 91 vs 53 on our snow score.

Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 80 vs 71 on our noise score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or CrossClimate 2?

Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 77 on the comfort score, within 3 points.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or CrossClimate 2?

Michelin CrossClimate 2, 84 vs 72 on our treadwear score.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology