Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 79 · 26 reviews
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Michelin X-Ice North 4 — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 13 road tests and 26 + 12 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: CrossContact LX25 and X-Ice North 4 are level at 73.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 74 · 13 tests Owners 75 · 12 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 20 in 2020 Nordic and Studded Winter Tyre Test (ice traction)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
X-Ice North 4 +176Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 X-Ice North 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 10 tests 70 81 Reviews found online 83 70 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.7 = 75
X-Ice North 4: 60% × 80.8 + 40% × 69.8 = 76
-
80
Wet
CrossContact LX25 +1565Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 X-Ice North 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 12 tests ≈ 77 (est.) 60 Reviews found online 83 74 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80
X-Ice North 4: 60% × 59.6 + 40% × 74 = 65
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
X-Ice North 4 +3083Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 X-Ice North 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / 11 tests 40 87 Reviews found online 72 77 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.7 = 53
X-Ice North 4: 60% × 87.1 + 40% × 77.4 = 83
-
76
Comfort
CrossContact LX25 +175Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 X-Ice North 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 4 tests ≈ 71 (est.) 76 Reviews found online 79 74 CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76
X-Ice North 4: 40% × 76 + 60% × 74 = 75
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
71
Noise
CrossContact LX25 +1160Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 X-Ice North 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 10 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 55 Reviews found online 78 ≈ 66 (est.) CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 71
X-Ice North 4: 60% × 55.4 + 40% × 66.4 (est.) = 60
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
No owner ratings of noise for X-Ice North 4. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
72
Treadwear
X-Ice North 4 +274Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 X-Ice North 4 Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 76 79 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
X-Ice North 4: 60% × 71 (est.) + 40% × 78.8 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for X-Ice North 4. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
CrossContact LX25 +277Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 X-Ice North 4 Reviews found online 79 77 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison60Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 X-Ice North 4 Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 7 tests – 60
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Michelin X-Ice North 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 73 | 73 |
| Dry | 75 | 76 |
| Wet | 80 | 65 |
| Snow | 53 | 83 |
| Comfort | 76 | 75 |
| Noise | 71 | 60 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | 77 |
| Efficiency | – | 60 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossContact LX25
X-Ice North 4
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | CrossContact LX25 | X-Ice North 4 | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 95% #6/6 · 2025 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
| Snow Traction | Snow | 68% #3/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 100% #1/8 · 2026 Vi Bilagare Studded Tyre Test | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | #3/6 2027 NAF Motor Studded Winter Tire Test R17 | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Tire B X-Ice North 4
Pros
- Outstanding grip and traction on ice and snow
- Significantly lower road noise compared to competing studded tires
- Comfortable ride quality
Cons
- Premature stud loss reported by some users over multiple seasons
- Slightly slippery feel on rain and dry concrete
- Light studs can struggle to penetrate loose snow sitting on top of hard ice
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Michelin X-Ice North 4 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 40 | — |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | — |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | — |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | — |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | — |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | — |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX25
Michelin X-Ice North 4
Too close to call: Continental CrossContact LX25 and Michelin X-Ice North 4 are within 2 points overall. Continental CrossContact LX25 is stronger on wet and noise. Michelin X-Ice North 4 is stronger on snow.
Michelin X-Ice North 4 scores 83 vs 53 on snow.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 65 on wet.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 71 vs 60 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact LX25 or X-Ice North 4?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or X-Ice North 4?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 65 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or X-Ice North 4?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 76 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or X-Ice North 4?
Michelin X-Ice North 4, 83 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or X-Ice North 4?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 60 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or X-Ice North 4?
Neither, by our numbers: 76 vs 75 on the comfort score, within 3 points.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or X-Ice North 4?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 74 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology