tirewheelguide

Vredestein Ultrac Cento looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.

Head-to-head Updated

Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Vredestein Ultrac Cento — Compared

Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 0 road tests and 26 + 23 owner reviews. How we score

CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 77–71

Check price on Amazon · CrossContact LX25 or Ultrac Cento on Amazon
Add your size for an exact match
/R

Both Amazon links then search this exact size.

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

Category by category

Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.

  1. 76

    Dry

    CrossContact LX25 +6
    70
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultrac Cento
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests70≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online8371

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 83.4 = 76

    Ultrac Cento: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 71 = 70

    No road tests of dry for Ultrac Cento. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).

  2. 80

    Wet

    CrossContact LX25 +7
    73
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultrac Cento
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 78 (est.)≈ 72 (est.)
    Reviews found online8474

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.8 (est.) + 40% × 83.5 = 80

    Ultrac Cento: 60% × 72.5 (est.) + 40% × 73.9 = 73

    No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

    No road tests of wet for Ultrac Cento. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).

  3. 53

    Snow

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultrac Cento
    Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests40–
    Reviews found online72–

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.3 + 40% × 72.1 = 53

  4. 77

    Comfort

    CrossContact LX25 +6
    71
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultrac Cento
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 71 (est.)≈ 70 (est.)
    Reviews found online8071

    CrossContact LX25: 40% × 71.1 (est.) + 60% × 80.2 = 77

    Ultrac Cento: 40% × 69.5 (est.) + 60% × 71.4 = 71

    No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25 or Ultrac Cento. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.

  5. 71

    Noise

    No comparison
    –
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultrac Cento
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 67 (est.)–
    Reviews found online78–

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.6 (est.) + 40% × 77.9 = 71

    No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.

  6. 72

    Treadwear

    Level
    72
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultrac Cento
    Professional tests (TWG score)≈ 69 (est.)≈ 69 (est.)
    Reviews found online7575

    CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72

    Ultrac Cento: 60% × 69.3 (est.) + 40% × 75.3 = 72

    No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

    No road tests of treadwear for Ultrac Cento. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).

  7. 79

    Handling (owners)

    CrossContact LX25 +10
    69
    Why this score
    SourceCrossContact LX25Ultrac Cento
    Reviews found online7969
Scores at a glance
CategoryContinental CrossContact LX25Vredestein Ultrac Cento
Relative Score 77 71
Dry 76 70
Wet 80 73
Snow 53 –
Comfort 77 71
Noise 71 –
Treadwear 72 72
Handling (owners) 79 69

Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.

Weight the categories that matter to you

Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.

Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost

Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.

Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
± 7

CrossContact LX25

± 8

Ultrac Cento

Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.

The professional test results behind the scores

Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.

DisciplineCategoryCrossContact LX25Ultrac CentoΔHead-to-head
Also published by the testers (not in the score)
Overall Ranking Overall #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady #27/49 2014 Auto Bild 50 Summer Tyre Shootout – Different tests

Pros, cons & observations

Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.

Tire A CrossContact LX25

Pros

  • Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
  • Significantly improved wet and snow traction
  • Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness

Cons

  • Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
  • Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
  • Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
All owner themes in the CrossContact LX25 review

Tire B Ultrac Cento

Pros

  • Exceptional tread life and wear resistance
  • High level of comfort and low road noise
  • Good value for money compared to premium competitors

Cons

  • Lacks steering feedback and pure grip for sporty or track driving
  • Average wet weather performance compared to dry
  • Some users report a temporary or ongoing negative impact on fuel economy
All owner themes in the Ultrac Cento review

Specs side by side

Attribute A · Continental CrossContact LX25 B · Vredestein Ultrac Cento
CategoryAll SeasonSummer
Vehicle typeSUV and 4x4Passenger Car / Crossover
Sizes available40—
Rim diameters16″ – 22″—
Tread depth10 - 12/32″—
UTQG740 A A - B—
SidewallBlack Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering—
Max pressure44 - 51 psi—

Which one should you actually buy?

Continental CrossContact LX25

Vredestein Ultrac Cento

Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better handling, wet and dry. It leads or ties in every category we score.

Pick tire A You enjoy sharp, responsive handling

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 69 on handling.

Pick tire A Your priority is wet-weather safety

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 73 on wet.

Pick tire A You want the most grip on dry roads

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 70 on dry.

Pick tire A You want the most comfortable ride

Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 77 vs 71 on comfort.

Tire A · Continental CrossContact LX25
Check price on Amazon
Tire B · Vredestein Ultrac Cento
Check price on Amazon

TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.

CrossContact LX25 or Ultrac Cento?

Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or Ultrac Cento?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 73 on our wet score.

Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or Ultrac Cento?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 70 on our dry score.

Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or Ultrac Cento?

Continental CrossContact LX25, 77 vs 71 on our comfort score.

Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or Ultrac Cento?

Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 72 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.

How do we compare tires?

Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.

Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.

Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology