Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 79 · 26 reviews
Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Yokohama AVID Ascend LX — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 1 + 1 road tests and 26 + 35 owner reviews. How we score
Too close to call: CrossContact LX25 72, AVID Ascend LX 71.
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · 1 test Owners 73 · 35 reviews
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
75
Dry
CrossContact LX25 +174Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 70 ≈ 72 (est.) Reviews found online 83 78 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.8 = 75
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 71.9 (est.) + 40% × 77.6 = 74
No road tests of dry for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
80
Wet
CrossContact LX25 +773Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 77 (est.) ≈ 73 (est.) Reviews found online 83 75 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.5 (est.) + 40% × 83.1 = 80
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 72.8 (est.) + 40% × 74.5 = 73
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
53
Snow
AVID Ascend LX +1265Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests 40 ≈ 67 (est.) Reviews found online 72 61 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 39.9 + 40% × 71.7 = 53
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 67.3 (est.) + 40% × 60.6 = 65
No road tests of snow for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
76
Comfort
CrossContact LX25 +472Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 71 (est.) ≈ 70 (est.) Reviews found online 79 74 CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.8 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76
AVID Ascend LX: 40% × 69.7 (est.) + 60% × 74 = 72
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25 or AVID Ascend LX. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
71
Noise
CrossContact LX25 +368Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 66 (est.) 63 Reviews found online 78 76 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.5 (est.) + 40% × 77.5 = 71
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 62.7 + 40% × 75.8 = 68
No road tests of noise for CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
72
Treadwear
CrossContact LX25 +171Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 AVID Ascend LX Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 69 (est.) Reviews found online 76 75 CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
AVID Ascend LX: 60% × 69.4 (est.) + 40% × 74.6 = 71
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for AVID Ascend LX. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
79
Handling (owners)
No comparison–Why this score
Source CrossContact LX25 AVID Ascend LX Reviews found online 79 –
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact LX25 | Yokohama AVID Ascend LX |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 72 | 71 |
| Dry | 75 | 74 |
| Wet | 80 | 73 |
| Snow | 53 | 65 |
| Comfort | 76 | 72 |
| Noise | 71 | 68 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 71 |
| Handling (owners) | 79 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
CrossContact LX25
AVID Ascend LX
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
The professional test results behind the scores
Per discipline: the average % of the best tire over every test both tires were in, and how many of those tests each one won. “Different tests” rows compare results from separate tests.
| Discipline | Category | CrossContact LX25 | AVID Ascend LX | Δ | Head-to-head |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| Dry Braking | Dry | 93% #2/3 · Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | 93% #4/7 · Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) | – | Different tests |
| Also published by the testers (not in the score) | |||||
| Overall Ranking | Overall | #2/3 Michelin CrossClimate 2 vs Continental CrossContact LX25 vs Goodyear WeatherReady | #6/7 Tire Rack Touring All-Season Tire Test (November 2025) | – | Different tests |
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact LX25
Pros
- Extremely quiet and smooth ride quality at all speeds
- Significantly improved wet and snow traction
- Enhanced braking performance and responsiveness
Cons
- Tends to pick up and throw gravel from the road surface
- Can feel a bit harsh or firm when hitting deep potholes
- Occasional reports of unexpectedly rapid treadwear in rare instances
Tire B AVID Ascend LX
Pros
- Exceptional treadlife with reports of high mileage remaining even after tens of thousands of miles
- Smooth and exceptionally comfortable ride quality
- Low road noise at highway speeds
Cons
- A few users experienced poor wet weather performance and dangerous hydroplaning
- Isolated reports of rapid, uneven front tire wear
- Slightly higher road noise noted by a minority of drivers compared to previous sets
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact LX25 | B · Yokohama AVID Ascend LX |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | 40 | 39 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 22″ | 15″ – 18″ |
| Tread depth | 10 - 12/32″ | 11/32″ |
| UTQG | 740 A A - B | 800 A A |
| Treadwear warranty | — | 85,000 mi |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 44 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 9 | 9 |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental CrossContact LX25
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX
Too close to call: Continental CrossContact LX25 and Yokohama AVID Ascend LX are within 2 points overall. Continental CrossContact LX25 is stronger on wet, comfort and noise. Yokohama AVID Ascend LX is stronger on snow.
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX scores 65 vs 53 on snow.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 73 on wet.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 72 on comfort.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 71 vs 68 on noise.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact LX25 or AVID Ascend LX?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact LX25 or AVID Ascend LX?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 73 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact LX25 or AVID Ascend LX?
Neither, by our numbers: 75 vs 74 on the dry score, within 3 points.
Which is better in snow, CrossContact LX25 or AVID Ascend LX?
Yokohama AVID Ascend LX, 65 vs 53 on our snow score.
Which is quieter, CrossContact LX25 or AVID Ascend LX?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 68 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact LX25 or AVID Ascend LX?
Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 72 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact LX25 or AVID Ascend LX?
Neither, by our numbers: 72 vs 71 on the treadwear score, within 3 points.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology