Tests – · none yet Owners 60 · 43 reviews
Head-to-head
Updated
Continental CrossContact UHP vs Pirelli Scorpion Zero — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 0 road tests and 43 + 484 owner reviews. How we score
CrossContact UHP is ahead, 64–58
Add your size for an exact match
/R
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 484 reviews
“I bought a set of 20” M-wheels when I my X5 was at around 2k miles. I had fitted Pirelli scorpion zero runflats on it. At 65k miles, they had to be replaced due to compound cracking, thread was still at 5 to 6/32. I think they served me well.”
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
68
Dry
CrossContact UHP +761Why this score
Source CrossContact UHP Scorpion Zero Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 68 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 69 57 CrossContact UHP: 60% × 68.3 (est.) + 40% × 68.8 = 68
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 61
No road tests of dry for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
No road tests of dry for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
-
70
Wet
CrossContact UHP +961Why this score
Source CrossContact UHP Scorpion Zero Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 70 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 69 57 CrossContact UHP: 60% × 69.8 (est.) + 40% × 69.1 = 70
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
No road tests of wet for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
56
Snow
Level56Why this score
Source CrossContact UHP Scorpion Zero Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 63 (est.) ≈ 63 (est.) Reviews found online 47 46 CrossContact UHP: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.7 = 56
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.4 = 56
No road tests of snow for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
No road tests of snow for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
-
64
Comfort
CrossContact UHP +955Why this score
Source CrossContact UHP Scorpion Zero Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 65 (est.) Reviews found online 63 49 CrossContact UHP: 40% × 67.4 (est.) + 60% × 62.5 = 64
Scorpion Zero: 40% × 64.7 (est.) + 60% × 49 = 55
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
-
68
Noise
CrossContact UHP +464Why this score
Source CrossContact UHP Scorpion Zero Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 66 (est.) ≈ 66 (est.) Reviews found online 69 60 CrossContact UHP: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 69.4 = 68
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 66.4 (est.) + 40% × 60.1 = 64
No road tests of noise for CrossContact UHP or Scorpion Zero. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
53
Treadwear
CrossContact UHP +350Why this score
Source CrossContact UHP Scorpion Zero Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 59 (est.) ≈ 57 (est.) Reviews found online 45 40 CrossContact UHP: 60% × 58.7 (est.) + 40% × 45 = 53
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.8 = 50
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact UHP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
-
64
Handling (owners)
CrossContact UHP +1252Why this score
Source CrossContact UHP Scorpion Zero Reviews found online 64 52
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental CrossContact UHP | Pirelli Scorpion Zero |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 64 | 58 |
| Dry | 68 | 61 |
| Wet | 70 | 61 |
| Snow | 56 | 56 |
| Comfort | 64 | 55 |
| Noise | 68 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 53 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 64 | 52 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Neutral
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Less important
NotLessNeutralImportantMost
Recomputed
Headline score
64
/ 100
CrossContact UHP
58
/ 100
Scorpion Zero
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A CrossContact UHP
Pros
- Excellent dry and wet grip
- Smooth and comfortable ride on compatible vehicles
- Inspires confidence in handling and cornering
Cons
- Rapid and premature tread wear, especially on front axles
- High road noise
- Firm or hard ride over bumps
Tire B Scorpion Zero
Pros
- Low road noise and enhanced ride comfort
- Strong dry and wet road handling and stability
- Good light snow and off-road capability (mud/grass)
Cons
- Rapid tread wear reported by some aggressive or high-horsepower drivers
- Occasional complaints regarding poor wet weather traction or aquaplaning
- High price point relative to some competitors
What real owners are saying
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Tire A
Continental CrossContact UHP
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
Tire B
Mixed
Pirelli Scorpion Zero
Community sentiment for the Pirelli Scorpion Zero family is mixed, with users frequently praising its smooth ride, dry and wet traction, and reduced road noise, particularly on newer Plus 3 and EV-focused variants. However, substantial criticism centers on rapid treadwear, with many owners reporting premature wear well under 25,000 to 30,000 miles, alongside complaints regarding warranty claims and inner foam insulation issues. While some drivers find good longevity and rim protection, others view the tire as short-lived and loud once worn.
r/tires
·3 upvotes ·2025-09-09
“The Scorpion Zero A/S is a very short lived tire. 11k seems nuts, but after taking a set of Pilot Sport 4 A/S for a 50k lap over a couple of years I replaced them with Pirellis thinking I was getting a better deal. They started losing chunks of tread within 5k and were almost bald after 20 (1 year for me). Never again.”
rennlist.com
“I installed Pirelli scorpion zero A/S plus on my cayenne a few weeks ago. So far, no complaints. Great tire. Very quiet, and much more comfortable than my previously worn out dws 06. I have 21" wheels so they are 35 profile tires. I will say they feel more luxury oriented than sport oriented, the sidewalls are a bit softer (which I like).”
camaro5.com
“I'm very hard on tires (my set has 6000 miles on them with only 50% tread left on the back tires ,the front look new ),so maybe the scorpion zero are not the tires for me . Set of almost new tires for $250 . Maybe I will buy them and sell the for a small profit.”
Top themes
#rapid treadwear life#smooth quiet ride#PNCS foam insulation#EV tire performance#wet dry traction#warranty claim issues#OEM tire replacement
Based on 53 community posts
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental CrossContact UHP | B · Pirelli Scorpion Zero |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 27 | 49 |
| Rim diameters | 16″ – 23″ | 18″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | 9 - 10/32″ | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 280 - 420 A - AA A | 500 A A |
| Sidewall | Black Side Wall | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | 50 - 51 psi | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 15 | 15 |
Which one should you actually buy?
64
/ 100
Continental CrossContact UHP
58
/ 100
Pirelli Scorpion Zero
Winner: Continental CrossContact UHP — better handling, wet and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score.
Pick tire A
You enjoy sharp, responsive handling
Continental CrossContact UHP scores 64 vs 52 on handling.
Pick tire A
Your priority is wet-weather safety
Continental CrossContact UHP scores 70 vs 61 on wet.
Pick tire A
You want the most comfortable ride
Continental CrossContact UHP scores 64 vs 55 on comfort.
Pick tire A
You want the most grip on dry roads
Continental CrossContact UHP scores 68 vs 61 on dry.
Tire A · Continental CrossContact UHP
Tire B · Pirelli Scorpion Zero
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
CrossContact UHP or Scorpion Zero?
Which is better in the wet, CrossContact UHP or Scorpion Zero?
Continental CrossContact UHP, 70 vs 61 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, CrossContact UHP or Scorpion Zero?
Continental CrossContact UHP, 68 vs 61 on our dry score.
Which is better in snow, CrossContact UHP or Scorpion Zero?
Neither, by our numbers: 56 vs 56 on the snow score, within 3 points.
Which is quieter, CrossContact UHP or Scorpion Zero?
Continental CrossContact UHP, 68 vs 64 on our noise score.
Which is more comfortable, CrossContact UHP or Scorpion Zero?
Continental CrossContact UHP, 64 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, CrossContact UHP or Scorpion Zero?
Continental CrossContact UHP, 53 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology