Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,383 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 9 + 0 road tests and 1,383 + 485 owner reviews. How we score
Pilot Sport 4 SUV is ahead, 81–58
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 80 · 9 tests Owners 79 · 1,383 reviews
Best test result: #1 of 12 in 2023 Best SUV Tyres Tested (wet braking)
“Loving my new Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires and Enkei Raijin wheels”
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 485 reviews
“I bought a set of 20” M-wheels when I my X5 was at around 2k miles. I had fitted Pirelli scorpion zero runflats on it. At 65k miles, they had to be replaced due to compound cracking, thread was still at 5 to 6/32. I think they served me well.”
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Scorpion Zero |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests | 86 | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 86 | 57 |
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 86.1 + 40% × 85.9 = 86
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 61
No road tests of dry for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Scorpion Zero |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests | 93 | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 87 | 57 |
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 93.4 + 40% × 86.5 = 91
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
No road tests of wet for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Scorpion Zero |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | – | ≈ 63 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | – | 46 |
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.4 = 56
No road tests of snow for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Scorpion Zero |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 2 / – tests | 54 | ≈ 65 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 71 | 49 |
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 40% × 54 + 60% × 70.6 = 64
Scorpion Zero: 40% × 64.7 (est.) + 60% × 49 = 55
No road tests of comfort for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Scorpion Zero |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests | 53 | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | ≈ 66 (est.) | 60 |
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 52.5 + 40% × 66.3 (est.) = 58
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 64
No owner ratings of noise for Pilot Sport 4 SUV. The owner half is the owners’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
No road tests of noise for Scorpion Zero. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Scorpion Zero |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 1 / – tests | 77 | ≈ 57 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 65 | 40 |
Pilot Sport 4 SUV: 60% × 77 + 40% × 65.4 = 72
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.7 = 50
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Scorpion Zero |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 83 | 52 |
| Source | Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Scorpion Zero |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · 9 / – tests | 64 | – |
| Category | Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV | Pirelli Scorpion Zero |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 81 | 58 |
| Dry | 86 | 61 |
| Wet | 91 | 61 |
| Snow | – | 56 |
| Comfort | 64 | 55 |
| Noise | 58 | 64 |
| Treadwear | 72 | 50 |
| Handling (owners) | 83 | 52 |
| Efficiency | 64 | – |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Scorpion Zero
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community members generally praise the Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV for its strong grip, handling performance, and SUV-specific design. Users frequently consider it an upgrade over OEM options like the Latitude Sport 3, though some discuss its premium price, summer temperature limitations, and expected tread longevity.
“The CrossClimate2 is supposed to be better in every way compared to the prior generations, including less rolling resistance (better fuel economy). Most Tire Rack reviews are from people who have only driven on tires for a short time so when there are tread life ratings from consumers I don't know how accurate it is. My Michelin Pilot Sport4SUV summer tires have 1500 miles on them and started at 9/32nds and are still 9/32nds (all 4 corners) with some very aggressive driving (testing rear sway bars) and only have 200 treadwear rating.”
“Figured I would update this thread. Ended up buying a set of four brand new 18" Saab 9-7X wheels that were shipped over, and went with Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV tires in 255/55R18 109Y XL flavor. This is the first set of French made Michelins I've purchased, and they all were manufactured in December 2021. Also got some chrome McGard spline drive lug nuts. The ride is definitely firmer than it was compared to the 255/60R17 106V tires on there previously, but that's a good thing in my book. Only put 18 miles on them so far, so I can't say all that much. However, I definitely like them so far.”
“Have a 2014 CTTS with 21" wheels. Just had Michelin PilotSport4 SUV All-season put on. Before that had Michelin PilotSport4S. Have about 1K miles on the new tires, and no experience with it in winter weather yet, but prefer the ride quality over the PS4S. The PS4SUV are a softer ride, yet still have plenty of grip when I hit the "Sport" button. IMO, the PS4S is overkill for the Cayenne. Obviously, subjective and YMMV. Does your wife engage in "spirited" driving? As background, I have PS4S tires on my 2016 Spyder and love them.”
Based on 25 community posts
Community sentiment for the Pirelli Scorpion Zero family is mixed, with users frequently praising its smooth ride, dry and wet traction, and reduced road noise, particularly on newer Plus 3 and EV-focused variants. However, substantial criticism centers on rapid treadwear, with many owners reporting premature wear well under 25,000 to 30,000 miles, alongside complaints regarding warranty claims and inner foam insulation issues. While some drivers find good longevity and rim protection, others view the tire as short-lived and loud once worn.
“I used Pirelli Scorpion Zero AS Plus 3”
“Quote: Originally Posted by MurrayA4 ... Is a very logical conclusion to reach.The spread between "ultra high perf." tires and many "touring" tires has shrunk a great deal.Sounds like the Verde is pretty respectable .Any idea what the UTQG ratings are on those ? I'm lazy ! Pirelli Scorpion Verde A/S 265/40/R21 - 105V (150mph) - UTQG 600AA - 34lbs, 12/32" Tread Depth, 29.3" Diameter Pirelli Scorpion Zero A/S Plus 265/40/R21 - 105Y (186mph) - UTQG 500AA - 33lbs, 10/32" Tread Depth, 29.3 Diameter I think if you tended more towards summer tires and/or lived in a dry-ish climate and could get a good price, the Zero A/S is a good tire. You might only get 30K out of them on a heavy performance SUV but compared to more expensive options the differences seem minimal. Personally, on a truck/SUV I've never experienced a tire rated 600AA have as good performance/stickiness (combined with long treadlife) as the Verdes...”
“I have a 2022 base model with 20in wheels and bought it with Michelin latitude tour HPs and had one in bad shape and just replaced all four with Pirelli scorpion zero AS plus. So far so good but haven’t experienced snow yet. I’m questioning the quality of the Michelins considering the car is 4 years old and the prior owner had replaced 3/4 of them at differing points, but who knows I guess it could have been a number of different things. The Pirellis were also cheaper than the Michelins.”
Based on 53 community posts
| Attribute | A · Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV | B · Pirelli Scorpion Zero |
|---|---|---|
| Category | Summer | All-Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 65 | 49 |
| Rim diameters | 17″ – 23″ | 18″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | — | 9/32″ |
| UTQG | 220 - 320 A - AA A | 500 A A |
| Sidewall | — | Blackwall |
| Max pressure | — | 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 32 | 32 |
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV
Pirelli Scorpion Zero
Winner: Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV — better handling, wet and dry. Pick the Pirelli Scorpion Zero if noise matters most to you.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 83 vs 52 on handling.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 91 vs 61 on wet.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 86 vs 61 on dry.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV scores 72 vs 50 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 91 vs 61 on our wet score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 86 vs 61 on our dry score.
Pirelli Scorpion Zero, 64 vs 58 on our noise score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 64 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Michelin Pilot Sport 4 SUV, 72 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology