Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 485 + 26 owner reviews. How we score
CrossContact LX25 is ahead, 73–58
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests – · none yet Owners 51 · 485 reviews
“I bought a set of 20” M-wheels when I my X5 was at around 2k miles. I had fitted Pirelli scorpion zero runflats on it. At 65k miles, they had to be replaced due to compound cracking, thread was still at 5 to 6/32. I think they served me well.”
Tests 59 · 1 test Owners 79 · 26 reviews
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
| Source | Scorpion Zero | CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 63 (est.) | 70 |
| Reviews found online | 57 | 83 |
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57 = 61
CrossContact LX25: 60% × 70.4 + 40% × 82.7 = 75
No road tests of dry for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.41).
| Source | Scorpion Zero | CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 63 (est.) | ≈ 78 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 57 | 83 |
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 63.4 (est.) + 40% × 57.4 = 61
CrossContact LX25: 60% × 77.6 (est.) + 40% × 83.2 = 80
No road tests of wet for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
No road tests of wet for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
| Source | Scorpion Zero | CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests | ≈ 63 (est.) | 40 |
| Reviews found online | 46 | 72 |
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 62.9 (est.) + 40% × 46.4 = 56
CrossContact LX25: 60% × 40.2 + 40% × 71.6 = 53
No road tests of snow for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.32).
| Source | Scorpion Zero | CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 65 (est.) | ≈ 71 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 49 | 79 |
Scorpion Zero: 40% × 64.7 (est.) + 60% × 49 = 55
CrossContact LX25: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 79.4 = 76
No road tests of comfort for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
No road tests of comfort for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.20).
| Source | Scorpion Zero | CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 66 (est.) | ≈ 66 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 60 | 77 |
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 59.9 = 64
CrossContact LX25: 60% × 66.3 (est.) + 40% × 77.3 = 71
No road tests of noise for Scorpion Zero or CrossContact LX25. The test half is the tested tires’ average (66): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests.
| Source | Scorpion Zero | CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Professional tests (TWG score) | ≈ 57 (est.) | ≈ 70 (est.) |
| Reviews found online | 40 | 76 |
Scorpion Zero: 60% × 56.9 (est.) + 40% × 39.7 = 50
CrossContact LX25: 60% × 69.7 (est.) + 40% × 75.5 = 72
No road tests of treadwear for Scorpion Zero. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
No road tests of treadwear for CrossContact LX25. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.36).
| Source | Scorpion Zero | CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Reviews found online | 52 | 79 |
| Category | Pirelli Scorpion Zero | Continental CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 58 | 73 |
| Dry | 61 | 75 |
| Wet | 61 | 80 |
| Snow | 56 | 53 |
| Comfort | 55 | 76 |
| Noise | 64 | 71 |
| Treadwear | 50 | 72 |
| Handling (owners) | 52 | 79 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Scorpion Zero
CrossContact LX25
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
From Reddit, forums and review threads. Not part of our score
Community sentiment for the Pirelli Scorpion Zero family is mixed, with users frequently praising its smooth ride, dry and wet traction, and reduced road noise, particularly on newer Plus 3 and EV-focused variants. However, substantial criticism centers on rapid treadwear, with many owners reporting premature wear well under 25,000 to 30,000 miles, alongside complaints regarding warranty claims and inner foam insulation issues. While some drivers find good longevity and rim protection, others view the tire as short-lived and loud once worn.
“I used Pirelli Scorpion Zero AS Plus 3”
“Quote: Originally Posted by MurrayA4 ... Is a very logical conclusion to reach.The spread between "ultra high perf." tires and many "touring" tires has shrunk a great deal.Sounds like the Verde is pretty respectable .Any idea what the UTQG ratings are on those ? I'm lazy ! Pirelli Scorpion Verde A/S 265/40/R21 - 105V (150mph) - UTQG 600AA - 34lbs, 12/32" Tread Depth, 29.3" Diameter Pirelli Scorpion Zero A/S Plus 265/40/R21 - 105Y (186mph) - UTQG 500AA - 33lbs, 10/32" Tread Depth, 29.3 Diameter I think if you tended more towards summer tires and/or lived in a dry-ish climate and could get a good price, the Zero A/S is a good tire. You might only get 30K out of them on a heavy performance SUV but compared to more expensive options the differences seem minimal. Personally, on a truck/SUV I've never experienced a tire rated 600AA have as good performance/stickiness (combined with long treadlife) as the Verdes...”
“I have a 2022 base model with 20in wheels and bought it with Michelin latitude tour HPs and had one in bad shape and just replaced all four with Pirelli scorpion zero AS plus. So far so good but haven’t experienced snow yet. I’m questioning the quality of the Michelins considering the car is 4 years old and the prior owner had replaced 3/4 of them at differing points, but who knows I guess it could have been a number of different things. The Pirellis were also cheaper than the Michelins.”
Based on 53 community posts
We haven't collected enough community discussion about this tire yet.
| Attribute | A · Pirelli Scorpion Zero | B · Continental CrossContact LX25 |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All-Season | All Season |
| Vehicle type | SUV and 4x4 | SUV and 4x4 |
| Sizes available | 49 | 40 |
| Rim diameters | 18″ – 23″ | 16″ – 22″ |
| Tread depth | 9/32″ | 10 - 12/32″ |
| UTQG | 500 A A | 740 A A - B |
| Sidewall | Blackwall | Black Side Wall - Raised Outline White Lettering |
| Max pressure | 51 psi | 44 - 51 psi |
| Sizes in common | 16 | 16 |
Pirelli Scorpion Zero
Continental CrossContact LX25
Winner: Continental CrossContact LX25 — better handling, treadwear and comfort. Pick the Pirelli Scorpion Zero if snow matters most to you.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 79 vs 52 on handling.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 72 vs 50 on treadwear.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 76 vs 55 on comfort.
Continental CrossContact LX25 scores 80 vs 61 on wet.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Continental CrossContact LX25, 80 vs 61 on our wet score.
Continental CrossContact LX25, 75 vs 61 on our dry score.
Pirelli Scorpion Zero, 56 vs 53 on our snow score.
Continental CrossContact LX25, 71 vs 64 on our noise score.
Continental CrossContact LX25, 76 vs 55 on our comfort score.
Continental CrossContact LX25, 72 vs 50 on our treadwear score.
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology
