Tests – · none yet Owners 67 · 8 reviews
Continental Eco Contact EP looks discontinued: no new owner reviews or road tests in five years and no current EU tyre label.
Continental Eco Contact EP vs Continental WinterContact TS 860 S — Compared
Relative Score (0–100): the weighted average of the categories below, each 60% road tests and 40% owner reviews (comfort 40/60). Based on 0 + 1 road tests and 8 + 14 owner reviews. How we score
WinterContact TS 860 S is ahead, 75–67
Add your size for an exact match
Both Amazon links then search this exact size.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Tests 71 · 1 test Owners 78 · 14 reviews
Best test result: #2 of 11 in 2019 19 Inch Performance Winter Tyre Test (dry handling)
Category by category
Relative Score per category, 0–100. Open “Why this score” for the tests and owner ratings behind it.
-
66
Dry
WinterContact TS 860 S +874Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 67 (est.) 73 Reviews found online 66 76 Eco Contact EP: 60% × 67 (est.) + 40% × 65.5 = 66
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 73 + 40% × 76.4 = 74
No road tests of dry for Eco Contact EP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.42).
-
69
Wet
WinterContact TS 860 S +574Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests ≈ 69 (est.) 70 Reviews found online 68 80 Eco Contact EP: 60% × 69.1 (est.) + 40% × 67.8 = 69
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 69.9 + 40% × 80.1 = 74
No road tests of wet for Eco Contact EP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.55).
-
–
Snow
No comparison73Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 71 Reviews found online – 77 WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 70.6 + 40% × 76.9 = 73
-
68
Comfort
WinterContact TS 860 S +876Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 69 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 68 79 Eco Contact EP: 40% × 68.9 (est.) + 60% × 67.9 = 68
WinterContact TS 860 S: 40% × 70.9 (est.) + 60% × 78.6 = 76
No road tests of comfort for Eco Contact EP or WinterContact TS 860 S. The test half is the tested tires’ average (69): owners’ comfort ratings barely follow the road tests.
-
–
Noise
No comparison71Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 74 Reviews found online – ≈ 67 (est.) WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 73.5 + 40% × 66.6 (est.) = 71
No owner ratings of noise for WinterContact TS 860 S. The owner half is the owners’ average (67): owners’ noise ratings barely follow the road tests, so the tests say nothing about how owners would rate it.
-
68
Treadwear
WinterContact TS 860 S +674Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) ≈ 67 (est.) ≈ 71 (est.) Reviews found online 70 79 Eco Contact EP: 60% × 67.5 (est.) + 40% × 70 = 68
WinterContact TS 860 S: 60% × 70.6 (est.) + 40% × 78.9 = 74
No road tests of treadwear for Eco Contact EP. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
No road tests of treadwear for WinterContact TS 860 S. The test half is estimated from the owner ratings, as far as owners and testers agree (correlation 0.35).
-
61
Handling (owners)
WinterContact TS 860 S +2081Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP WinterContact TS 860 S Reviews found online 61 81 -
–
Efficiency
No comparison77Why this score
Source Eco Contact EP WinterContact TS 860 S Professional tests (TWG score) · – / 1 tests – 77
Scores at a glance
| Category | Continental Eco Contact EP | Continental WinterContact TS 860 S |
|---|---|---|
| Relative Score | 67 | 75 |
| Dry | 66 | 74 |
| Wet | 69 | 74 |
| Snow | – | 73 |
| Comfort | 68 | 76 |
| Noise | – | 71 |
| Treadwear | 68 | 74 |
| Handling (owners) | 61 | 81 |
| Efficiency | – | 77 |
Higher is better. The Relative Score follows your weights below; category scores do not change.
Weight the categories that matter to you
Wet grip starts at “Important”. Treadwear starts at “Neutral” here: road tests measured it for at most one of the two tires, so it rests on owner reviews. Move the sliders and the scores update instantly.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Only one of the two tires has a score here, so this weight changes nothing in the head-to-head.
Eco Contact EP
WinterContact TS 860 S
Only categories both tires have data for count toward the headline score.
Pros, cons & observations
Themes extracted from owner reviews found online — not the opinion of TireWheelGuide.
Tire A Eco Contact EP
Pros
- Exceptional tread longevity and durability
- High fuel efficiency
- Reliable grip in dry and wet conditions
Cons
- Vague or weak steering feedback
- Poor performance in snowy conditions
- Susceptibility to sidewall and tread cracking after long-term aging
Tire B WinterContact TS 860 S
Pros
- Exceptional handling and feedback on dry and wet roads in cold temperatures
- Strong performance and confidence in snow and icy conditions
- Stiffer sidewalls compared to predecessors, offering improved cornering stability
Cons
- Long break-in period required before optimal grip is achieved
- Potential for traction control interference on staggered RWD setups due to circumference variances
- Limited lateral grip in wet conditions compared to some competitors
Specs side by side
| Attribute | A · Continental Eco Contact EP | B · Continental WinterContact TS 860 S |
|---|---|---|
| Category | All Season | Winter |
| Vehicle type | Passenger Car / Crossover | Passenger Car / Crossover |
| Sizes available | — | 92 |
| Rim diameters | — | 16″ – 23″ |
| Tread depth | — | 10 - 11/32″ |
| Sidewall | — | Black Side Wall |
| Max pressure | — | 50 - 51 psi |
Which one should you actually buy?
Continental Eco Contact EP
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S
Winner: Continental WinterContact TS 860 S — better handling, dry and comfort. It leads or ties in every category we score. Continental Eco Contact EP rests on little evidence so far (0 tests, 8 reviews), so read this result as provisional. Continental WinterContact TS 860 S rests on little evidence so far (1 test, 14 reviews), so read this result as provisional.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 81 vs 61 on handling.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 74 vs 66 on dry.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 76 vs 68 on comfort.
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S scores 74 vs 68 on treadwear.
TireWheelGuide may earn a commission from purchases made through these links.
Eco Contact EP or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Which is better in the wet, Eco Contact EP or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S, 74 vs 69 on our wet score.
Which grips better on dry roads, Eco Contact EP or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S, 74 vs 66 on our dry score.
Which is more comfortable, Eco Contact EP or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S, 76 vs 68 on our comfort score.
Which lasts longer, Eco Contact EP or WinterContact TS 860 S?
Continental WinterContact TS 860 S, 74 vs 68 on our treadwear score.
How do we compare tires?
Every category score blends two independent signals. 60% comes from professional tire tests (braking distances, lap times, noise measurements), each result compared with every other tire in the same test and newer tests counting more. 40% comes from owner reviews found online, adjusted for how generously each site rates. Both use one scale: the average tested tire gets 70, the best 100. When a tire has only one of the two, the missing half is estimated from the other and the score stays closer to average; with no road test and fewer than five owner reviews it gets no score yet.
Handling is the exception: road tests measure it inside the dry and wet scores, so its own row comes from owner ratings only and starts as less important.
Community buzz from Reddit and forums is shown for context only — it never changes the score. Full methodology